jilibet 2024

jilibet 2024 NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Married couples across the U.S. have had access to no-fault divorce for more than 50 years, an option many call crucial to supporting domestic abuse victims and key to preventing already crowded family courts from drowning in complicated divorce proceedings. But some advocates for women worried as old comments from now Vice President-elect JD Vance circulated during the presidential campaign opposing no-fault divorce. After President-elect Donald Trump and Vance won the election, warnings began popping up on social media urging women who might be considering divorce to "pull the trigger" while they still could. Some attorneys posted saying they saw a spike in calls from women seeking divorce consultations. Donald and Ivana Trump pose in May 1988 outside the Federal Courthouse in New York after she was sworn in as a United States citizen. Trump — who is twice-divorced — hasn't championed overhauling the country's divorce laws, but in 2021 Vance lamented that divorce is too easily accessible, as have conservative podcasters and others. "We've run this experiment in real time and what we have is a lot of very, very real family dysfunction that's making our kids unhappy," Vance said during a speech at a Christian high school in California, where he criticized people being able to "shift spouses like they change their underwear." Marriage rates held steady but divorce rates of women age 15 and older declined from 2012 to 2022, according to U.S. Census Bureau data released in October. Despite concerns, even those who want to make divorces harder to get say they don't expect big, swift changes. There is not a national coordinated effort underway. States determine their own divorce laws, so national leaders can't directly change policy. "Even in some of the so-called red states, it hasn't gotten anywhere," said Beverly Willett, co-chair of the Coalition for Divorce Reform, whose group unsuccessfully attempted to convince states to repeal their no-fault divorce laws. A couple exchanges wedding bands Oct. 11, 2018, at City Hall in Philadelphia. Mark A. Smith, a political science professor at the University of Washington, said while many Americans became accustomed to no-fault divorce being an option, Vance's previous comments on making it more difficult to separate from a spouse could help jump-start that effort. "Even though he's not directly proposing a policy, it's a topic that hasn't gotten a ton of discussion in the last 15 years," Smith said. "And so to have a national profile politician talk that way is noteworthy." Meanwhile, Republican Party platforms in Texas and Nebraska were amended in 2022 to call for the removal of no-fault divorce. Louisiana's Republican Party considered something similar this year but declined to do so. A handful of proposals were introduced in conservative-led statehouses over the years, but all immediately stalled after they were filed. In January, Oklahoma Republican Sen. Dusty Deevers introduced legislation that would have removed married couples from filing for divorce on the grounds of incompatibility. Deevers backed the bill after writing a piece declaring no-fault divorce was an "abolition of marital obligation." Sen. JD Vance smiles as his wife Usha Vance applauds Nov. 6 at an election-night watch party at the Palm Beach Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Fla. Similarly, in South Carolina, two Republican lawmakers in 2023 filed a bill that would have required both spouses to file for a no-fault divorce application rather than just one. In South Dakota, a Republican lawmaker attempted to remove irreconcilable difference as grounds for divorce since 2020. None of the sponsors of these bills responded to interview requests from The Associated Press. All are members of their state's conservative Freedom Caucus. Nevertheless, some Democratic lawmakers say they remain worried about the future of no-fault divorce. They point to the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the constitutional right to abortion in 2022 as an example of a long-accepted option that was revoked through a decades-long effort. "When you choose to be silent, you allow for this to creep in," said Democratic South Dakota Rep. Linda Duba. "These are the bills that gain a foothold because you choose to be silent." Before California became the first state to adopt a no-fault divorce option in 1969, married couples had to prove their spouse violated one of the approved "faults" outlined in their state's divorce law or risk a judge denying their divorce, said Joanna Grossman, a law professor at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. Qualified reasons varied from state to state, but largely included infidelity, incarceration or abandonment. Donald and Marla Trump wave to photographers Dec. 20, 1993, as they enter their wedding reception in New York's Plaza Hotel. The system was a particular burden on domestic violence victims, who are often women who could be stuck in dangerous marriages while they try to prove their partner's abuse in court through expensive and lengthy legal proceedings. "If there was any evidence that the couple both wanted to get divorced that was supposed to be denied because divorce was not something you got because you wanted it, it was something you got because you've been wronged in a way that the state thought was significant," Grossman said. To date, every state in the U.S. adopted a no-fault divorce option. However, 33 states still have a list of approved "faults" to file as grounds for divorce — ranging from adultery to felony conviction. In 17 states, married people only have the option of choosing no-fault divorce to end their marriages. Photo Credit: shisu_ka / Shutterstock Marriage—and divorce—in the U.S. today are starkly different than in earlier eras of the country’s history. A series of economic, legal, and social shifts reshaped marriage in the second half of the 20th century. More women began working outside of the home in the post-World War II era, which provided avenues to financial security and independence outside of marriage. Greater emphasis on postsecondary educational attainment and career development have led young people to wait longer to enter marriage. States began to adopt no-fault divorce laws throughout the 1960s and 1970s that made it easier to end a marriage. Meanwhile, changing social and cultural attitudes have made it more common for couples to cohabitate, combine finances, and raise children prior to getting married—or without getting married at all. These trends have contributed to a decline in the overall number of marriages and to delays in when people get married for the first time. In the U.S., there are currently only 6.5 marriages per 1,000 people each year , compared to 10.9 five decades ago. For those who do choose to get married, the age of first marriage is happening later. As late as the early 1970s, the median age for a first marriage in the U.S. was just 22. By 2018, that figure had increased to 28.8. These shifts have also affected how likely married couples are to stay together. As women entered the workforce in the mid-20th century and feminism and the sexual revolution took hold, rates of divorce rose quickly throughout the 1960s and 1970s. From 1960 to 1980, the divorce rate per 1,000 people in the U.S. more than doubled from 2.2 to 5.2. But the rate began to fall steadily after 1980, and as of 2018, the rate of divorce had dropped to 2.9 per 1,000 people. The link between rates of divorce and age at first marriage has been borne out over time, but it also explains geographic differences in rates of divorce. Today, most of the states with the lowest rates of divorce are also those with a higher median age for marriage. States like New Jersey, New York, California, and Massachusetts all stand out for having fewer than 10% of adults divorced and an age at first marriage above 30. One exception to this is Utah, which has the lowest overall median age for first marriage at 25.5 but also the third-lowest share of divorced adults at 9%, likely due in part to the state’s strong religious ties to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints . In contrast, Maine and Nevada lead all states in the share of the population currently divorced at 13.9% and 13.8%, respectively. And at the local level, many of the cities with the highest levels of divorce are found in Florida, Appalachia, and the Southwest. The data used in this analysis is from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 American Community Survey . To determine the most divorced locations, researchers at ChamberOfCommerce.org calculated the percentage of adults currently divorced. In the event of a tie, the location with the higher percentage of adults currently separated was ranked higher. To improve relevance, only cities with at least 100,000 residents were included. Additionally, cities were grouped into cohorts based on population size: small (100,000–149,999), midsize (150,000–349,999), and large (350,000 or more). Here are the most divorced cities in the U.S. Photo Credit: Jacob Boomsma / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Photo Credit: photo.ua / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Jonny Trego / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Tupungato / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Kevin J King / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Galina Savina / Shutterstock Photo Credit: f11photo / Shutterstock Photo Credit: CHARLES MORRA / Shutterstock Photo Credit: LHBLLC / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Valiik30 / Shutterstock Photo Credit: turtix / Shutterstock Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox! Stay up-to-date on the latest in local and national government and political topics with our newsletter.The film's title, "窗前明月，咣！" (Window Moon, Bang!), reflects its quirky and offbeat sensibilities, hinting at the unexpected twists and turns that await audiences. The combination of moonlit romance and comedic chaos promises a unique and unforgettable viewing experience that will have audiences laughing, gasping, and cheering in equal measure.In a shocking turn of events, a construction site in Huizhou, China, became the scene of a tragic incident when a worker jumped off a building in protest over unpaid wages. The incident has once again highlighted the ongoing issue of wage disputes and worker exploitation in the construction industry.

In conclusion, China's leadership in the number of intangible cultural heritage projects and the successful inscription of the Spring Festival on the UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage list is a cause for celebration and pride. As we continue to cherish and preserve our cultural heritage, let us also embrace the diversity and richness of the world's cultural traditions, for they are the threads that bind us together in a shared tapestry of humanity.One of the key factors contributing to this trend is the adjustment of the interbank deposit rates. As the backbone of the financial system, interbank deposit rates play a crucial role in determining the cost of funding for financial institutions. The recent downward movement in these rates has put pressure on the profitability of money market funds, leading to a decline in their yields.

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec 5, 2024-- All Remote – GitLab Inc. (NASDAQ: GTLB), the most comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps platform, today reported financial results for its third quarter fiscal year 2025, ended October 31, 2024. “GitLab’s growth at scale is a testament to the demand for a platform approach to software development,” said Sid Sijbrandij, co-founder and executive chair of the board of directors, GitLab Inc. “Our end-to-end DevSecOps platform addresses our customers’ need to accelerate the pace of software development to remain competitive, innovate faster, and ship software more securely.” In a separate press release issued today, December 5, 2024, the company announced Bill Staples was named CEO and a member of the board of directors effective today. Staples succeeds co-founder and CEO Sid Sijbrandij, who is stepping down from his day-to-day role to focus on his health. Sijbrandij will transition to executive chair of the GitLab board of directors. The announcement can be found at https://ir.gitlab.com/ . “We delivered record non-GAAP operating margins as our third quarter fiscal year 2025 revenue reached $196 million dollars, an increase of 31% year-over-year,” said Brian Robins, GitLab chief financial officer. “I am very pleased with our results and the team’s execution as we continue to deliver against our commitment to responsible growth.” Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Highlights (in millions, except per share data and percentages) : Q3 FY 2025 Q3 FY 2024 Y/Y Change Revenue $ 196.0 $ 149.7 31 % GAAP Gross margin 89 % 90 % Non-GAAP Gross margin 91 % 91 % GAAP Operating margin (15 )% (27 )% Non-GAAP Operating margin 13 % 3 % GAAP Operating loss $ (28.7 ) $ (40.3 ) $ 11.6 Non-GAAP Operating income $ 25.9 $ 4.7 $ 21.2 GAAP Net Income (loss) attributable to GitLab $ 29.6 $ (285.2 ) $ 314.8 Non-GAAP Net income attributable to GitLab $ 39.1 $ 14.4 $ 24.7 GAAP Net income (loss) per share attributable to GitLab, basic $ 0.18 $ (1.84 ) $ 2.02 GAAP Net income (loss) per share attributable to GitLab, diluted $ 0.18 $ (1.84 ) $ 2.02 Non-GAAP Net income per share attributable to GitLab, basic $ 0.24 $ 0.09 $ 0.15 Non-GAAP Net income per share attributable to GitLab, diluted $ 0.23 $ 0.09 $ 0.14 GAAP net cash used in operating activities $ (177.0 ) $ (6.0 ) $ (171.0 ) Non-GAAP adjusted free cash flow $ 9.7 $ (6.7 ) $ 16.4 A reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures is contained in this release under the section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Additional Financial Highlights: Customers with more than $5,000 of ARR reached 9,519, an increase of 16% year-over-year. Customers with more than $100,000 of ARR reached 1,144, an increase of 31% year-over-year. Dollar-Based Net Retention Rate was 124%. Total RPO grew 48% year-over-year to $811.8 million, while cRPO grew 39% to $515.2 million. Business Highlights: Recognized as a Leader in the Gartner® Magic QuadrantTM for DevOps Platforms for the second consecutive year. Announced an integrated offering with AWS that brings together GitLab Duo and Amazon Q. Together, GitLab Duo and Amazon Q provide a seamless AI-powered developer experience that combines DevSecOps workflows and AWS environments to help organizations ship secure software faster. Announced the general availability of Advanced SAST for GitLab Ultimate customers, leveraging technology acquired with Oxeye, for more accurate vulnerability detections in first-party code. Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Outlook For the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025, GitLab Inc. expects ( in millions, except share and per share data) : Q4 FY 2025 Guidance FY 2025 Guidance Revenue $205.0 - $206.0 $753 - $754 Non-GAAP operating income $28.0 - $29.0 $69 - $70 Non-GAAP diluted net income per share assuming approximately 170 million and 168 million weighted average shares outstanding during Q4 FY 2025 and FY 2025, respectively. $0.22 - $0.23 $0.63 - $0.64 These statements are forward-looking and actual results may differ materially as a result of many factors. Refer to the Forward-Looking Statements safe harbor below for information on the factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures has been provided in the financial statement tables included in this press release. An explanation of these measures is also included below in Non-GAAP Financial Measures. We have not provided the most directly comparable GAAP financial guidance measures because certain items are out of our control or cannot be reasonably predicted. Accordingly, a reconciliation of non-GAAP guidance for operating income (loss) and net income (loss) per share to the corresponding GAAP measures is not available. Conference Call Information GitLab will host a conference call today, December 5, 2024, at 1:30 p.m. (PT) / 4:30 p.m. (ET) to discuss its third quarter fiscal year 2025 financial results and its guidance for the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025. Interested parties may register for the call in advance by visiting https://bit.ly/3Ul8cwM . A live webcast of this conference call will be available on GitLab’s investor relations website ( ir.gitlab.com ), and a replay will also be archived on the website for one year. About GitLab GitLab is the most comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps platform for software innovation. GitLab enables organizations to increase developer productivity, improve operational efficiency, reduce security and compliance risk, and accelerate digital transformation. More than 40 million registered users and more than 50% of the Fortune 100 trust GitLab to ship better, more secure software faster. Non-GAAP Financial Measures GitLab believes non-GAAP measures are useful in evaluating its operating performance. GitLab uses this supplemental information to evaluate its ongoing operations and for internal planning and forecasting purposes. GitLab believes that non-GAAP financial information, when taken collectively with its GAAP financial information, may be helpful to investors because it provides consistency and comparability with past financial performance. However, non-GAAP financial information is presented for supplemental informational purposes only, has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial results as determined in accordance with GAAP are included at the end of this press release following the accompanying financial data. We define non-GAAP financial measures as GAAP measures, excluding certain items such as stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, foreign exchange (gain) loss, equity method investment loss and impairment, acquisition related expenses, changes in the fair value of acquisition related contingent consideration, charitable donation of common stock, restructuring charges, a non-recurring income tax adjustment related to bilateral advance pricing agreement (“BAPA”) negotiations, and other expenses that the Company believes are not indicative of its ongoing operations. Shares used for net income per share on a non-GAAP basis include incremental dilutive shares related to restricted stock units, options, and shares issuable under GitLab Inc.’s 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan that are anti-dilutive on a GAAP basis. A reconciliation of non-GAAP guidance measures to corresponding GAAP measures is not available on a forward-looking basis without unreasonable effort due to the uncertainty of expenses that may be incurred in the future. Investors are encouraged to review the related GAAP financial measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. Adjusted Free Cash Flow Adjusted free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that we calculate as net cash provided by operating activities less cash used for purchases of property and equipment, plus any non-recurring income tax payments related to BAPA. We believe that adjusted free cash flow is a useful indicator of liquidity that provides information to management and investors about the amount of cash generated from our operations that, after the investments in property and equipment and any non-recurring income tax payments related to BAPA, can be used for strategic initiatives, including investing in our business, and strengthening our financial position. One limitation of adjusted free cash flow is that it does not reflect our future contractual commitments. Additionally, adjusted free cash flow does not represent the total increase or decrease in our cash balance for a given period. Forward-Looking Statements This press release and the accompanying earnings call contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained in this release and the accompanying earnings call are reasonable, they are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause actual results or outcomes to be materially different from any future results or outcomes expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors include, but are not limited to the following: our ability to effectively manage our growth; our revenue growth rate in the future; our ability to achieve and sustain profitability, our business, financial condition, and operating results; security and privacy breaches; intense competition in our markets and loss of market share to our competitors; our ability to respond to rapid technological changes; the market for our services may not grow; a decline in our customer renewals and expansions; fluctuations in our operating results; our incorporation of artificial intelligence features into our products; our transparency; our publicly available company Handbook; customers staying on our free self-managed or SaaS product offering; our ability to accurately predict the long-term rate of customer subscription renewals or adoption, or the impact of these renewals and adoption; our hiring model; the effects of ongoing armed conflict in different regions of the world on our business; and general economic conditions (including changes in interest rates, inflation, uncertainty of the federal budget, increased volatility in the capital markets, and instability in the global banking sector) and slow or negative growth of our markets. Further information on these and additional risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those included in or contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this release are included under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in the filings and reports we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any obligation to update or release any revisions to any forward-looking statement or to report any events or circumstances after the date of this press release or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law. Operating Metrics Annual Recurring Revenue (“ARR”): We define annual recurring revenue as the annual run-rate revenue of subscription agreements, including our self-managed and SaaS offerings but excluding professional services, from all customers as measured on the last day of a given month. We calculate ARR by taking the monthly recurring revenue (“MRR”) and multiplying it by 12. MRR for each month is calculated by aggregating, for all customers during that month, monthly revenue from committed contractual amounts of subscriptions, including our self-managed license, self-managed subscription, and SaaS subscription offerings but excluding professional services. Dollar-Based Net Retention Rate: We calculate Dollar-Based Net Retention Rate as of a period end by starting with our customers as of the 12 months prior to such period end (“Prior Period ARR”). We then calculate the ARR from these customers as of the current period end (“Current Period ARR”). The calculation of Current Period ARR includes any upsells, price adjustments, user growth within a customer, contraction, and attrition. We then divide the total Current Period ARR by the total Prior Period ARR to arrive at the Dollar-Based Net Retention Rate. GitLab Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands, except per share data) (unaudited) October 31, 2024 (1) January 31, 2024 (1) ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents $ 176,632 $ 287,996 Short-term investments 740,340 748,289 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $891 and $673 as of October 31, 2024 and January 31, 2024, respectively 197,555 166,731 Deferred contract acquisition costs, current 34,518 32,300 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 43,120 45,601 Total current assets 1,192,165 1,280,917 Property and equipment, net 3,563 2,954 Operating lease right-of-use assets 444 405 Goodwill 16,131 8,145 Intangible assets, net 19,536 1,733 Deferred contract acquisition costs, non-current 17,248 19,317 Other non-current assets 3,552 4,390 TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,252,639 $ 1,317,861 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable $ 2,224 $ 1,738 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 51,821 286,178 Accrued compensation and benefits 27,274 35,809 Deferred revenue, current 383,183 338,348 Total current liabilities 464,502 662,073 Deferred revenue, non-current 14,138 23,794 Other non-current liabilities 3,776 14,060 TOTAL LIABILITIES 482,416 699,927 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: Preferred stock, $0.0000025 par value; 50,000 shares authorized as of October 31, 2024 and January 31, 2024; no shares issued and outstanding as of October 31, 2024 and January 31, 2024 — — Class A Common stock, $0.0000025 par value; 1,500,000 shares authorized as of October 31, 2024 and January 31, 2024; 140,528 and 114,670 shares issued and outstanding as of October 31, 2024 and January 31, 2024, respectively — — Class B Common stock, $0.0000025 par value; 250,000 shares authorized as of October 31, 2024 and January 31, 2024; 21,555 and 42,887 shares issued and outstanding as of October 31, 2024 and January 31, 2024, respectively — — Additional paid-in capital 1,891,653 1,718,661 Accumulated deficit (1,161,952 ) (1,149,822 ) Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (4,996 ) 2,335 Total GitLab stockholders’ equity 724,705 571,174 Noncontrolling interests 45,518 46,760 TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 770,223 617,934 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 1,252,639 $ 1,317,861 (1) As of October 31, 2024 and January 31, 2024, the consolidated balance sheet includes assets of the consolidated variable interest entity, GitLab Information Technology (Hubei) Co., LTD (“JiHu”), of $43.4 million and $47.6 million, respectively, and liabilities of $6.1 million for each period presented. The assets of JiHu can be used only to settle obligations of JiHu and creditors of JiHu do not have recourse against the general credit of GitLab Inc. GitLab Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands, except per share data) (unaudited) Three Months Ended October 31, Nine Months Ended October 31, 2024 2023 2024 2023 Revenue: Subscription—self-managed and SaaS $ 175,257 $ 130,993 $ 489,617 $ 364,280 License—self-managed and other 20,790 18,675 58,201 51,847 Total revenue 196,047 149,668 547,818 416,127 Cost of revenue: Subscription—self-managed and SaaS 17,170 11,559 47,639 33,321 License—self-managed and other 4,955 3,525 14,632 10,398 Total cost of revenue 22,125 15,084 62,271 43,719 Gross profit 173,922 134,584 485,547 372,408 Operating expenses: Sales and marketing 95,340 86,978 285,542 265,631 Research and development 61,354 49,058 176,767 148,452 General and administrative 45,960 38,815 146,615 110,882 Total operating expenses 202,654 174,851 608,924 524,965 Loss from operations (28,732 ) (40,267 ) (123,377 ) (152,557 ) Interest income 12,586 10,874 37,443 27,301 Other income (expense), net 4,992 569 5,457 (508 ) Loss before income taxes and loss from equity method investment (11,154 ) (28,824 ) (80,477 ) (125,764 ) Loss from equity method investment, net of tax — (743 ) — (2,408 ) Provision for (benefit from) income taxes (39,421 ) 256,788 (66,131 ) 262,290 Net income (loss) $ 28,267 $ (286,355 ) $ (14,346 ) $ (390,462 ) Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (1,298 ) (1,197 ) (2,216 ) (2,755 ) Net income (loss) attributable to GitLab $ 29,565 $ (285,158 ) $ (12,130 ) $ (387,707 ) Net income (loss) per share attributable to GitLab Class A and Class B common stockholders: Basic $ 0.18 $ (1.84 ) $ (0.08 ) $ (2.53 ) Diluted $ 0.18 $ (1.84 ) $ (0.08 ) $ (2.53 ) Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable to GitLab Class A and Class B common stockholders: Basic 161,317 155,123 159,756 153,504 Diluted 167,436 155,123 159,756 153,504 GitLab Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands) (unaudited) Three Months Ended October 31, Nine Months Ended October 31, 2024 2023 2024 2023 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income (loss), including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interest $ 28,267 $ (286,355 ) $ (14,346 ) $ (390,462 ) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Stock-based compensation expense 48,042 41,334 139,263 120,032 Change in fair value of acquisition related contingent consideration — — 3,750 — Charitable donation of common stock 2,957 2,675 8,871 8,025 Amortization of intangible assets 2,511 521 5,931 1,646 Depreciation expense 680 1,123 2,361 3,329 Amortization of deferred contract acquisition costs 12,704 10,447 35,650 31,066 Loss from equity method investment — 940 — 3,048 Net amortization of premiums or discounts on short-term investments (3,792 ) (5,867 ) (12,933 ) (14,361 ) Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain), net (5,184 ) (573 ) (5,442 ) 252 Other non-cash expense, net 467 420 768 317 Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (32,883 ) (30,572 ) (31,658 ) (5,291 ) Prepaid expenses and other current assets (10,773 ) (3,935 ) 2,498 (8,183 ) Deferred contract acquisition costs (14,751 ) (13,623 ) (35,706 ) (31,760 ) Other non-current assets 1,348 (453 ) 851 (1,174 ) Accounts payable (1,317 ) 799 33 (224 ) Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (220,071 ) 244,674 (241,704 ) 245,857 Accrued compensation and benefits (1,913 ) 231 (8,815 ) 2,842 Deferred revenue 19,665 14,270 34,503 29,158 Other non-current liabilities (2,985 ) 17,983 (11,068 ) 16,070 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (177,028 ) (5,961 ) (127,193 ) 10,187 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchases of short-term investments (240,136 ) (238,680 ) (503,394 ) (573,676 ) Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments 148,763 253,995 524,862 526,979 Purchases of property and equipment (1,057 ) (736 ) (2,608 ) (1,269 ) Payments for business combination, net of cash acquired — — (20,210 ) — Payments for asset acquisition (346 ) — (7,660 ) — Escrow payment related to business combination, after acquisition date — — — (2,500 ) Other investing activities — — 457 — Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (92,776 ) 14,579 (8,553 ) (50,466 ) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from the issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options, including early exercises, net of repurchases 7,822 4,715 17,895 22,492 Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan — — 7,932 7,751 Settlement of acquisition related contingent cash consideration (4,900 ) — (4,900 ) — Net cash provided by financing activities 2,922 4,715 20,927 30,243 Impact of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents 4,898 (1,249 ) 3,455 (2,557 ) Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (261,984 ) 12,084 (111,364 ) (12,593 ) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 438,616 273,225 287,996 297,902 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 176,632 $ 285,309 $ 176,632 $ 285,309 GitLab Inc. Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP (in thousands, except per share data) (unaudited) Three Months Ended October 31, Nine Months Ended October 31, 2024 2023 2024 2023 Gross profit on GAAP basis $ 173,922 $ 134,584 $ 485,547 $ 372,408 Gross margin on GAAP basis 89 % 90 % 89 % 89 % Stock-based compensation expense 1,993 1,648 5,924 4,760 Amortization of acquired intangibles 2,511 521 5,931 1,546 Restructuring charges — — — 463 Gross profit on non-GAAP basis $ 178,426 $ 136,753 $ 497,402 $ 379,177 Gross margin on non-GAAP basis 91 % 91 % 91 % 91 % Sales and marketing on GAAP basis $ 95,340 $ 86,978 $ 285,542 $ 265,631 Stock-based compensation expense (17,012 ) (16,523 ) (54,290 ) (51,582 ) Restructuring charges (130 ) 54 (1,126 ) (3,623 ) Sales and marketing on non-GAAP basis $ 78,198 $ 70,509 $ 230,126 $ 210,426 Research and development on GAAP basis $ 61,354 $ 49,058 $ 176,767 $ 148,452 Stock-based compensation expense (14,384 ) (12,738 ) (42,834 ) (36,917 ) Restructuring charges — (72 ) (393 ) (2,119 ) Research and development on non-GAAP basis $ 46,970 $ 36,248 $ 133,540 $ 109,416 General and administrative on GAAP basis $ 45,960 $ 38,815 $ 146,615 $ 110,882 Stock-based compensation expense (14,653 ) (10,425 ) (36,215 ) (26,773 ) Amortization of acquired intangibles — — — (100 ) Restructuring charges 11 4 (377 ) (1,634 ) Charitable donation of common stock (2,957 ) (2,675 ) (8,871 ) (8,025 ) Changes in the fair value of acquisition related contingent consideration — — (3,750 ) — Acquisition related expenses (140 ) — (2,849 ) — Other non-recurring charges (872 ) (413 ) (1,084 ) (413 ) General and administrative on non-GAAP basis $ 27,349 $ 25,306 $ 93,469 $ 73,937 Loss from operations on GAAP basis $ (28,732 ) $ (40,267 ) $ (123,377 ) $ (152,557 ) Stock-based compensation expense 48,042 41,334 139,263 120,032 Amortization of acquired intangibles 2,511 521 5,931 1,646 Restructuring charges 119 14 1,896 7,839 Charitable donation of common stock 2,957 2,675 8,871 8,025 Changes in the fair value of acquisition related contingent consideration — — 3,750 — Acquisition related expenses 140 — 2,849 — Other non-recurring charges 872 413 1,084 413 Income (loss) from operations on non-GAAP basis $ 25,909 $ 4,690 $ 40,267 $ (14,602 ) Other income (expense), net on GAAP basis $ 4,992 $ 569 $ 5,457 $ (508 ) Foreign exchange gains (losses), net (5,096 ) (488 ) (5,326 ) 506 Other income (expense), net on non-GAAP basis $ (104 ) $ 81 $ 131 $ (2 ) Net income (loss) attributable to GitLab common stockholders on GAAP basis $ 29,565 $ (285,158 ) $ (12,130 ) $ (387,707 ) Stock-based compensation expense 48,042 41,334 139,263 120,032 Amortization of acquired intangibles 2,511 521 5,931 1,646 Restructuring charges 119 14 1,896 7,839 Charitable donation of common stock 2,957 2,675 8,871 8,025 Changes in the fair value of acquisition related contingent consideration — — 3,750 — Acquisition related expenses 140 — 2,849 — Loss from equity method investment, net of tax — 743 — 2,408 Foreign exchange gains (losses), net (5,096 ) (488 ) (5,326 ) 506 Income tax adjustment (39,965 ) 254,392 (78,047 ) 254,392 Other non-recurring charges 872 413 1,084 413 Net income attributable to GitLab common stockholders on non-GAAP basis $ 39,145 $ 14,446 $ 68,141 $ 7,554 GAAP net income (loss) per share, basic $ 0.18 $ (1.84 ) $ (0.08 ) $ (2.53 ) GAAP net income (loss) per share, diluted $ 0.18 $ (1.84 ) $ (0.08 ) $ (2.53 ) Non-GAAP net income per share, basic $ 0.24 $ 0.09 $ 0.43 $ 0.05 Non-GAAP net income per share, diluted $ 0.23 $ 0.09 $ 0.41 $ 0.05 Shares used in per share calculation - basic on GAAP basis 161,317 155,123 159,756 153,504 Effect of dilutive securities 6,119 7,671 7,637 7,774 Shares used in per share calculation - diluted on non-GAAP basis 167,436 162,794 167,393 161,278 GitLab Inc. Reconciliation of GAAP Cash Flow from Operating Activities to Adjusted Free Cash Flow (in thousands) (unaudited) Three Months Ended October 31, Nine Months Ended October 31, 2024 2023 2024 2023 Computation of adjusted free cash flow GAAP net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ (177,028 ) $ (5,961 ) $ (127,193 ) $ 10,187 Less: Purchases of property and equipment (1,057 ) (736 ) (2,608 ) (1,269 ) Add: Income tax payments related to BAPA 187,735 — 187,735 — Non-GAAP adjusted free cash flow $ 9,650 $ (6,697 ) $ 57,934 $ 8,918 View source version on businesswire.com : https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241205686308/en/ CONTACT: Media Contact: Lisa Boughner VP, Global Communications GitLab Inc. press@gitlab.com Investor Contact: Kelsey Turcotte VP, Investor Relations GitLab Inc. ir@gitlab.com KEYWORD: UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA CALIFORNIA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: DATA MANAGEMENT SECURITY APPS/APPLICATIONS TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SOURCE: GitLab Inc. Copyright Business Wire 2024. PUB: 12/05/2024 04:06 PM/DISC: 12/05/2024 04:05 PM http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241205686308/en

Despite overwhelming evidence of the soldier's brutal actions, the defense argued that he was merely acting in self-defense and that his military training had kicked in, causing him to react violently in a high-stress situation. The prosecution, on the other hand, presented a compelling case that the soldier's actions were racially motivated and constituted a clear case of excessive force.

In a shocking turn of events, a highly anticipated PlayStation 4 exclusive game has been cancelled due to what developers have described as poor management practices at Ubisoft. The news has sent shockwaves through the gaming community, with many expressing their disappointment and frustration at the decision.Title: "Assassin's Creed: Valhalla - The Vinland Blue Skin Sparks Heated Discussions among Players: Too Political or Just Right!"

Latest challenge to North Carolina's power-shifting law focuses on state elections board control

Sinn Fein actively pursuing route into government, insists leader McDonald

Ohio State, Michigan players involved in postgame scuffle

Trudeau fails to win assurances over trade tariffs after talks with TrumpIndia News Today Live Updates: Trending India News brings you the most significant stories and developments from across the nation, covering everything from politics and economy to culture and technology. Whether it's a major policy change, a groundbreaking legal verdict, or the latest in entertainment and sports, we ensure you don't miss out on the news that's shaping the nation. Our in-depth coverage and timely updates keep you informed about the trends that are making headlines in India today. Stay connected to the pulse of the nation with Trending India News. India News Today Live: Vande Bharats to get a bullet boost

PatchMaster Expands to Boise, Idaho with New Franchisee Michael Linderman

Another ex-player rips Jets’ Aaron Rodgers: ‘Arrogance, smugness, entitlement ... I’m just tired of it’Local jewelers in various countries have also reported a decrease in gold prices, with fluctuations ranging from 1% to 4% depending on the region. The reduced demand for gold as an investment option has had a direct impact on the prices offered by these retailers.Repealing no-fault divorce has so far stalled across the US. Some worry that'll change

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Married couples across the U.S. have had access to no-fault divorce for more than 50 years, an option many call crucial to supporting domestic abuse victims and key to preventing already crowded family courts from drowning in complicated divorce proceedings. But some advocates for women worried as old comments from now Vice President-elect JD Vance circulated during the presidential campaign opposing no-fault divorce. After President-elect Donald Trump and Vance won the election, warnings began popping up on social media urging women who might be considering divorce to "pull the trigger" while they still could. Some attorneys posted saying they saw a spike in calls from women seeking divorce consultations. Donald and Ivana Trump pose in May 1988 outside the Federal Courthouse in New York after she was sworn in as a United States citizen. Trump — who is twice-divorced — hasn't championed overhauling the country's divorce laws, but in 2021 Vance lamented that divorce is too easily accessible, as have conservative podcasters and others. "We've run this experiment in real time and what we have is a lot of very, very real family dysfunction that's making our kids unhappy," Vance said during a speech at a Christian high school in California, where he criticized people being able to "shift spouses like they change their underwear." Marriage rates held steady but divorce rates of women age 15 and older declined from 2012 to 2022, according to U.S. Census Bureau data released in October. Despite concerns, even those who want to make divorces harder to get say they don't expect big, swift changes. There is not a national coordinated effort underway. States determine their own divorce laws, so national leaders can't directly change policy. "Even in some of the so-called red states, it hasn't gotten anywhere," said Beverly Willett, co-chair of the Coalition for Divorce Reform, whose group unsuccessfully attempted to convince states to repeal their no-fault divorce laws. A couple exchanges wedding bands Oct. 11, 2018, at City Hall in Philadelphia. Mark A. Smith, a political science professor at the University of Washington, said while many Americans became accustomed to no-fault divorce being an option, Vance's previous comments on making it more difficult to separate from a spouse could help jump-start that effort. "Even though he's not directly proposing a policy, it's a topic that hasn't gotten a ton of discussion in the last 15 years," Smith said. "And so to have a national profile politician talk that way is noteworthy." Meanwhile, Republican Party platforms in Texas and Nebraska were amended in 2022 to call for the removal of no-fault divorce. Louisiana's Republican Party considered something similar this year but declined to do so. A handful of proposals were introduced in conservative-led statehouses over the years, but all immediately stalled after they were filed. In January, Oklahoma Republican Sen. Dusty Deevers introduced legislation that would have removed married couples from filing for divorce on the grounds of incompatibility. Deevers backed the bill after writing a piece declaring no-fault divorce was an "abolition of marital obligation." Sen. JD Vance smiles as his wife Usha Vance applauds Nov. 6 at an election-night watch party at the Palm Beach Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Fla. Similarly, in South Carolina, two Republican lawmakers in 2023 filed a bill that would have required both spouses to file for a no-fault divorce application rather than just one. In South Dakota, a Republican lawmaker attempted to remove irreconcilable difference as grounds for divorce since 2020. None of the sponsors of these bills responded to interview requests from The Associated Press. All are members of their state's conservative Freedom Caucus. Nevertheless, some Democratic lawmakers say they remain worried about the future of no-fault divorce. They point to the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the constitutional right to abortion in 2022 as an example of a long-accepted option that was revoked through a decades-long effort. "When you choose to be silent, you allow for this to creep in," said Democratic South Dakota Rep. Linda Duba. "These are the bills that gain a foothold because you choose to be silent." Before California became the first state to adopt a no-fault divorce option in 1969, married couples had to prove their spouse violated one of the approved "faults" outlined in their state's divorce law or risk a judge denying their divorce, said Joanna Grossman, a law professor at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. Qualified reasons varied from state to state, but largely included infidelity, incarceration or abandonment. Donald and Marla Trump wave to photographers Dec. 20, 1993, as they enter their wedding reception in New York's Plaza Hotel. The system was a particular burden on domestic violence victims, who are often women who could be stuck in dangerous marriages while they try to prove their partner's abuse in court through expensive and lengthy legal proceedings. "If there was any evidence that the couple both wanted to get divorced that was supposed to be denied because divorce was not something you got because you wanted it, it was something you got because you've been wronged in a way that the state thought was significant," Grossman said. To date, every state in the U.S. adopted a no-fault divorce option. However, 33 states still have a list of approved "faults" to file as grounds for divorce — ranging from adultery to felony conviction. In 17 states, married people only have the option of choosing no-fault divorce to end their marriages. The link between rates of divorce and age at first marriage has been borne out over time, but it also explains geographic differences in rates of divorce. Today, most of the states with the lowest rates of divorce are also those with a higher median age for marriage. States like New Jersey, New York, California, and Massachusetts all stand out for having fewer than 10% of adults divorced and an age at first marriage above 30. One exception to this is Utah, which has the lowest overall median age for first marriage at 25.5 but also the third-lowest share of divorced adults at 9%, likely due in part to the state’s strong religious ties to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints . In contrast, Maine and Nevada lead all states in the share of the population currently divorced at 13.9% and 13.8%, respectively. And at the local level, many of the cities with the highest levels of divorce are found in Florida, Appalachia, and the Southwest. The data used in this analysis is from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 American Community Survey . To determine the most divorced locations, researchers at ChamberOfCommerce.org calculated the percentage of adults currently divorced. In the event of a tie, the location with the higher percentage of adults currently separated was ranked higher. To improve relevance, only cities with at least 100,000 residents were included. Additionally, cities were grouped into cohorts based on population size: small (100,000–149,999), midsize (150,000–349,999), and large (350,000 or more). Here are the most divorced cities in the U.S. Photo Credit: Jacob Boomsma / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Photo Credit: photo.ua / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Jonny Trego / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Tupungato / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Kevin J King / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Sean Pavone / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Galina Savina / Shutterstock Photo Credit: f11photo / Shutterstock Photo Credit: CHARLES MORRA / Shutterstock Photo Credit: LHBLLC / Shutterstock Photo Credit: Valiik30 / Shutterstock Photo Credit: turtix / Shutterstock Stay up-to-date on the latest in local and national government and political topics with our newsletter.

India News Today Live Updates on December 24, 2024 : Vande Bharats to get a bullet boostThe Mountain Hawks got two touchdowns to rally from 16-7 deficit in the last 10 minutes to earn a trip to Idaho for the FCS round-of-16.

These High-Resale Value SUVs Are A Smart Buyer's Best BetOne of the key factors contributing to the increase in the SME development index is the supportive policies and initiatives implemented by the Chinese government to boost the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises. These policies include tax incentives, access to funding and credit, streamlined regulatory procedures, and support for innovation and technology adoption. The government's efforts to create a more favorable business environment for SMEs have been instrumental in driving their development and expansion.

The player in question, whose name has been withheld for legal reasons, was once regarded as a rising star in English football. With his exceptional talent on the field and charismatic presence off it, he quickly became a fan favorite and a key player for his club. However, behind the scenes, a darker truth was beginning to emerge.