nice88 apk
nice88 apk

Trump has flip-flopped on abortion policy. His appointees may offer clues to what happens nextNone
Laguna Beach lifeguards are first department in OC to deploy EVs for beach patrolNone
For many years, historians knew of only ten first-edition copies of Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince —the controversial 16th-century political treatise—all held by institutions. However, they recently learned of an 11th copy owned by a private collector, which is now heading to the auction block. Sotheby’s will sell the book at an upcoming Books & Manuscripts auction in London, where it could fetch as much as $375,000. The book was printed in 1532, five years after the author’s death. The dominant text inside is actually Machiavelli’s Florentine Histories , a lengthy chronicle of Florence commissioned by Pope Leo X . But experts are more interested in the book’s inclusion of The Prince , Machiavelli’s most famous work, which he wrote around 1513. “We were not aware of any other copies in private hands, and this is the first copy that we are aware of to have come to auction, certainly in recent decades,” Gabriel Heaton , Sotheby’s books and manuscripts specialist, tells CNN ’s Amarachi Orie. He adds that this particular first-edition copy of The Prince , which features an early 17th-century Italian binding, is “very interesting.” Per a statement from Sotheby’s, The Prince is “one of the most notorious and influential books of all time.” In the early 16th century, its author was a civic official in the Florentine Republic . But in 1512, the infamous Medici family regained power over Florence. Machiavelli was imprisoned and tortured on suspicion of conspiracy against the Medicis, and while exiled to his father’s property south of Florence, he wrote The Prince —which some consider the first modern treatise on political science. The Prince is essentially a “handbook for statesmen” that offers guidance on “how political rulers can stay in power,” as NPR ’s Sylvia Poggioli wrote on the treatise’s 500th anniversary in 2013. One of the work’s most famous lines is: “My view is that it is desirable to be both loved and feared; but it is difficult to achieve both and, if one of them has to be lacking, it is much safer to be feared than loved.” Machiavelli dedicated The Prince to Lorenzo di Piero de’ Medici , who ruled Florence between 1513 and 1519. The text circulated as a manuscript while Machiavelli was alive, and historians know that at least seven copies were made before its official publication in 1532 , per Sotheby’s. In 1559, the Catholic church banned The Prince ; it wouldn’t be published again in Italy until 1630. Since The Prince ’s publication , Machiavelli’s name has become “synonymous with political deceit, cynicism and the ruthless use of power,” as NPR wrote, though some scholars have argued that the philosopher doesn’t deserve this reputation. Today, the term “ Machiavellian ” is frequently used to describe deceitful actions taken in an attempt to gain power. “We have one of the great works of political theory of all time, one of the most famous books of the 16th century, and it’s a very first edition,” Heaton tells CNN. Sotheby’s is “delighted” to offer the “incredibly rare book,” he adds. This copy is also lightly annotated. An anonymous reader bracketed a section of text in chapter 18, which includes “some of The Prince ’s most strikingly modern pronouncements about the necessity for a savvy politician to manipulate the gulf between appearances and reality to his own ends,” per the statement. Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday. Sonja Anderson | READ MORE Sonja Anderson is a writer and reporter based in New York City.
PGA Tour ScheduleA former NFL star has accused Vice President Kamala Harris of being intoxicated during her speech to Americans on Wednesday. Harris, who lost the 2024 presidential election to Donald Trump in early November, gave a speech to dejected Democrats on Wednesday. However, many are taking to social media to talk about her appearance in the speech. The full speech has gone viral on social media, as it was posted on X, formerly known as Twitter. “I just have to remind you: Don’t you ever let anybody take your power from you,” Harris stated in the clip posted to the Democratic Party’s account. “You have the same power that you did before November 5, and you have the same purpose that you did. And you have the same ability to engage and inspire, so don’t ever let anybody or any circumstance take your power from you.” Democratic National Party. Former NFL star Antonio Brown was among those accusing Harris of being intoxicated during her speech. "Drunk Auntie on Thanksgiving...." he wrote. NFL fans are weighing in on the accusation. "She started before the Lions game came on, I know that look, I’ve seen it in the mirror by game two," one fan wrote. "She’s definitely gonna be the one making a scene, stumbling around, calling everyone fascist until she starts crying and telling you how much she loves you before she passes out in backyard," one fan added. "Look's exactly like my sixth grade reading teacher, Mrs. Gillis, who had a bottle of "Listerine," that she sipped out of all day," one fan added. "Imagine the Thanksgiving dinner chaos with Kamala Harris at the table! Culture clash or comedy gold?" one fan added. Vice President @KamalaHarris ’ message to supporters. pic.twitter.com/x5xMUGTtkz Brown, of course, isn't one to talk about public appearances. The former NFL star last played in the league in 2022, when he ran off the field at Metlife Stadium with his shirt off. "I took a seat on the sideline and my coach came up to me, very upset, and shouted, 'What's wrong with you? What's wrong with you?' I told him, 'It's my ankle.' But he knew that. It was well-documented and we had discussed it," Brown said of his behavior. "He then ordered me to get on the field. I said, 'Coach, I can't.' He didn't call for medical attention. Instead, he shouted at me, 'YOU'RE DONE!' while he ran his finger across his throat. Coach was telling me that if I didn't play hurt, then I was done with the Bucs." He added: "I know we were losing to the Jets and that was frustrating for all of us. But I could not make football plays on that ankle. Yes, I walked off the field. But there's a major difference between launching from the line and taking hits, compared to jogging off the field with a rush of emotions going through your mind. I am reflecting on my reaction, but there was a trigger. The trigger was someone telling me that I'm not allowed to feel pain." Brown, 36, played in the NFL from 2010-2021. He was a five-time All-Pro, but he's clearly gone off the deep end in recent years.
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. CRWD shares are falling Wednesday following the release of the company’s third-quarter financial results and analyst changes. What To Know: CrowdStrike reported third-quarter revenue of $1.01 billion, beating the consensus estimate of $982.36 million and reflecting a 29% year-over-year increase. Adjusted earnings per share came in at 93 cents, beating the estimate of 81 cents. The company's annual recurring revenue grew 27% year-over-year to $4.02 billion, with $153 million added in net new ARR during the quarter. Outlook: CrowdStrike issued guidance for the fourth quarter, projecting revenue between $1.029 billion and $1.035 billion, roughly in line with the consensus estimate of $1.03 billion. Adjusted earnings per share are expected to be between 84 cents and 86 cents, matching the 86 cents consensus estimate. Guidance was roughly in-line with consensus estimates. For fiscal year 2025, CrowdStrike sees revenue in the range of $3.923 billion to $3.931 billion, slightly above estimates of $3.897 billion and sees adjusted EPS guidance to $3.74 to $3.76, above the $3.63 consensus. CEO George Kurtz emphasized the company's customer retention rate of over 97% and highlighted CrowdStrike's success in expanding relationships with clients impacted by a global IT outage earlier in the year. Analyst Reactions : HSBC downgraded the stock from Buy to Hold and set a price target of $347 following the report. Other analysts reactions to the report are as follows: Needham : Maintained Buy rating and raised price target from $360 to $420. Rosenblatt : Maintained Buy rating with a price target of $385. Baird : Maintained Outperform rating and raised price target from $375 to $390. WestPark Capital : Reiterated Hold rating. B of A Securities : Maintained Buy rating and raised price target from $365 to $400. Susquehanna : Maintained Positive rating and raised price target from $310 to $400. BMO Capital : Maintained Outperform rating and raised price target from $315 to $380. Citigroup : Maintained Buy rating and raised price target from $300 to $400. Oppenheimer : Maintained Outperform rating and raised price target from $365 to $410. Piper Sandler : Maintained Overweight rating and raised price target from $290 to $375. RBC Capital : Maintained Outperform rating and lowered price target from $370 to $365. Wells Fargo : Maintained Overweight rating and raised price target from $350 to $400. CRWD Price Action: CrowdStrike shares were down 6.18% at $341.80 at the time of writing, according to Benzinga Pro. Read Next : Trump Tariffs On Mexico Could Affect Beer: Why Your Modelo, Corona Could Cost More Next Year Image Via Shutterstock. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
By Hannah Fry, Los Angeles Times (TNS) Every day millions of people share more intimate information with their accessories than they do with their spouse. Wearable technology — smartwatches, smart rings, fitness trackers and the like — monitors body-centric data such as your heart rate, steps taken and calories burned, and may record where you go along the way. Like Santa Claus, it knows when you are sleeping (and how well), it knows when you’re awake, it knows when you’ve been idle or exercising, and it keeps track of all of it. People are also sharing sensitive health information on health and wellness apps , including online mental health and counseling programs. Some women use period tracker apps to map out their monthly cycle. These devices and services have excited consumers hoping for better insight into their health and lifestyle choices. But the lack of oversight into how body-centric data are used and shared with third parties has prompted concerns from privacy experts, who warn that the data could be sold or lost through data breaches, then used to raise insurance premiums, discriminate surreptitiously against applicants for jobs or housing, and even perform surveillance. The use of wearable technology and medical apps surged in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic, but research released by Mozilla on Wednesday indicates that current laws offer little protection for consumers who are often unaware just how much of their health data are being collected and shared by companies. “I’ve been studying the intersections of emerging technologies, data-driven technologies, AI and human rights and social justice for the past 15 years, and since the pandemic I’ve noticed the industry has become hyper-focused on our bodies,” said Mozilla Foundation technology fellow Júlia Keserű, who conducted the research. “That permeates into all kinds of areas of our lives and all kinds of domains within the tech industry.” The report “From Skin to Screen: Bodily Integrity in the Digital Age” recommends that existing data protection laws be clarified to encompass all forms of bodily data. It also calls for expanding national health privacy laws to cover health-related information collected from health apps and fitness trackers and making it easier for users to opt out of body-centric data collections. Researchers have been raising alarms about health data privacy for years. Data collected by companies are often sold to data brokers or groups that buy, sell and trade data from the internet to create detailed consumer profiles. Body-centric data can include information such as the fingerprints used to unlock phones, face scans from facial recognition technology, and data from fitness and fertility trackers, mental health apps and digital medical records. One of the key reasons health information has value to companies — even when the person’s name is not associated with it — is that advertisers can use the data to send targeted ads to groups of people based on certain details they share. The information contained in these consumer profiles is becoming so detailed, however, that when paired with other data sets that include location information, it could be possible to target specific individuals, Keserű said. Location data can “expose sophisticated insights about people’s health status, through their visits to places like hospitals or abortions clinics,” Mozilla’s report said, adding that “companies like Google have been reported to keep such data even after promising to delete it.” A 2023 report by Duke University revealed that data brokers were selling sensitive data on individuals’ mental health conditions on the open market. While many brokers deleted personal identifiers, some provided names and addresses of individuals seeking mental health assistance, according to the report. In two public surveys conducted as part of the research, Keserű said, participants were outraged and felt exploited in scenarios where their health data were sold for a profit without their knowledge. “We need a new approach to our digital interactions that recognizes the fundamental rights of individuals to safeguard their bodily data, an issue that speaks directly to human autonomy and dignity,” Keserű said. “As technology continues to advance, it is critical that our laws and practices evolve to meet the unique challenges of this era.” Consumers often take part in these technologies without fully understanding the implications. Last month, Elon Musk suggested on X that users submit X-rays, PET scans, MRIs and other medical images to Grok, the platform’s artificial intelligence chatbot, to seek diagnoses. The issue alarmed privacy experts, but many X users heeded Musk’s call and submitted health information to the chatbot. While X’s privacy policy says that the company will not sell user data to third parties, it does share some information with certain business partners. Gaps in existing laws have allowed the widespread sharing of biometric and other body-related data. Health information provided to hospitals, doctor’s offices and medical insurance companies is protected from disclosure under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , known as HIPAA, which established federal standards protecting such information from release without the patient’s consent. But health data collected by many wearable devices and health and wellness apps don’t fall under HIPAA’s umbrella, said Suzanne Bernstein, counsel at Electronic Privacy Information Center. “In the U.S. because we don’t have a comprehensive federal privacy law ... it falls to the state level,” she said. But not every state has weighed in on the issue. Washington, Nevada and Connecticut all recently passed laws to provide safeguards for consumer health data. Washington, D.C., in July introduced legislation that aimed to require tech companies to adhere to strengthened privacy provisions regarding the collection, sharing, use or sale of consumer health data. In California, the California Privacy Rights Act regulates how businesses can use certain types of sensitive information, including biometric information, and requires them to offer consumers the ability to opt out of disclosure of sensitive personal information. “This information being sold or shared with data brokers and other entities hypercharge the online profiling that we’re so used to at this point, and the more sensitive the data, the more sophisticated the profiling can be,” Bernstein said. “A lot of the sharing or selling with third parties is outside the scope of what a consumer would reasonably expect.” Health information has become a prime target for hackers seeking to extort healthcare agencies and individuals after accessing sensitive patient data. Health-related cybersecurity breaches and ransom attacks increased more than 4,000% between 2009 and 2023, targeting the booming market of body-centric data, which is expected to exceed $500 billion by 2030, according to the report. “Nonconsensual data sharing is a big issue,” Keserű said. “Even if it’s biometric data or health data, a lot of the companies are just sharing that data without you knowing, and that is causing a lot of anxiety and questions.” ©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit at latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.