60 jilibet

Traton SE ( OTCMKTS:TRATF – Get Free Report ) was the recipient of a large growth in short interest during the month of December. As of December 15th, there was short interest totalling 433,800 shares, a growth of 119.0% from the November 30th total of 198,100 shares. Based on an average trading volume of 100 shares, the days-to-cover ratio is presently 4,338.0 days. Traton Stock Performance Shares of OTCMKTS TRATF opened at $28.79 on Friday. The firm has a 50 day moving average price of $31.27 and a two-hundred day moving average price of $31.63. Traton has a 52-week low of $22.23 and a 52-week high of $38.24. About Traton ( Get Free Report ) Read More Receive News & Ratings for Traton Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Traton and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Eastern Ontario police arrest Scarborough resident found with nearly $50K of cocaine

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has rejected TikTok’s emergency motion to temporarily halt a law that could see the app banned in the US unless its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, divests from it. This decision intensifies the uncertainty surrounding TikTok’s future in the country as the deadline approaches. TikTok’s emergency motion, filed earlier in the week, sought to delay the enforcement of a law signed by President Joe Biden. Related Stories TikTok ban: American creators direct followers to Youtube, Instagram Google, Microsoft, TikTok, others pay N2.55 trillion taxes in Nigeria in half-year 2024 – NITDA The law mandates that ByteDance must divest from TikTok by January 19, 2025, or face a nationwide ban. However, the appeals court dismissed the motion, stating there’s no history of blocking a law after ruling it constitutional. “The petitioners have not identified any case in which a court, after rejecting a constitutional challenge to an Act of Congress, has enjoined the Act from going into effect while review is sought in the Supreme Court.” The court added that TikTok’s petition had relied on claims of free speech violations, which the judges had already rejected in their original decision last week. The ‘Divest or Ban ’ law emerged as part of escalating concerns over TikTok’s ownership by ByteDance, a Chinese company. The US government has long argued that this ownership poses a potential national security risk, citing fears that user data could be accessed by the Chinese government or that the app could be used for propaganda purposes. To address these concerns, President Joe Biden signed the law earlier this year, mandating that ByteDance must either divest from TikTok or face a nationwide ban by January 19, 2025. The legislation reflects bipartisan efforts to curb perceived threats from foreign-controlled technology platforms, particularly those linked to China. The law builds on previous actions taken during the Trump administration, which sought to ban TikTok outright but faced legal and procedural roadblocks. By introducing a clear deadline and divestment requirement, the ‘Divest or Ban’ law aims to resolve these issues while emphasizing the importance of safeguarding US data and security. Following the ruling, TikTok announced its intention to escalate the case to the Supreme Court. The company emphasized the potential impact on its 170 million US users if the ban is enforced. “As we have previously stated, we plan on taking this case to the Supreme Court, which has an established historical record of protecting Americans’ right to free speech. The voices of over 170 million Americans here in the US and around the world will be silenced on January 19th, 2025 unless the TikTok ban is halted,” TikTok said in a statement. TikTok has strongly opposed the law, describing it as unconstitutional. The company also claims that divesting from ByteDance is technically “unfeasible” within the given timeframe. Beijing has echoed TikTok’s stance, expressing opposition to any forced sale of the app. If TikTok fails to divest, the app could be removed from app stores, and updates or downloads would be prohibited. This would affect millions of US users who rely on the platform for content creation, entertainment, and communication.

Intel’s latest graphics card release has ignited excitement but securing one is a challenge. Yesterday, Intel unveiled its highly anticipated Battlemage series, rolling out the Arc B580 GPU, featuring the advanced Xe2 architecture. This Limited Edition release has sparked a frenzy among tech enthusiasts. Exclusivity Drives Demand The Arc B580’s debut was met with immediate high demand, causing it to rapidly sell out. According to sources, the card was seen on Newegg for an introductory price of $249.99. This model stands out with its 12 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, a solid 192-bit bus, and 20 Xe2 cores. Gaming performance reviews highlight its potential, especially at 1440p, surpassing competitors like the RTX 4060 and RX 7600. Despite minor driver issues, it’s a serious contender in the budget GPU market. Challenges in Availability Finding this GPU in stock presents a challenge. Newegg anticipates restocking by January 3, 2025, amid numerous pre-orders. Similarly, Amazon lists several versions expected in early January. B&H and LDLC have also opted for pre-order models due to the scarcity. The Limited Edition status bolsters its allure, with Intel planning no further production once stock runs out. As consumers eagerly await availability, a cheaper option, the Arc B570, is on the horizon, hitting stores on December 16. This launch offers tech aficionados a promising alternative to experience Intel’s latest innovations. Unlocking the Secrets: Intel’s Revolutionary Arc B580 GPU Intel’s recent foray into the graphics card market with the Battlemage series has sparked widespread interest, and the Arc B580 GPU is at the center of this surge. This new offering promises to redefine performance in the budget GPU sector with its cutting-edge Xe2 architecture. Exploring the Power of Intel Xe2 Architecture One of the standout features of the Arc B580 GPU is its revolutionary Xe2 architecture. This architecture packs 20 Xe2 cores, aimed at delivering superior gaming and graphical performance. Combined with 12 GB of GDDR6 VRAM and a robust 192-bit bus, it’s designed to handle games at 1440p resolution with ease, offering a competitive edge over NVIDIA’s RTX 4060 and AMD’s RX 7600. Performance Reviews and Comparisons Initial test results showcase the Arc B580’s impressive capability in handling demanding gaming titles, often trumping its competitors in the same price bracket. Reviews have highlighted its potential for smooth gameplay, particularly in 1440p settings. The Arc B580 has been praised for delivering an immersive experience without breaking the bank. Innovation Meets Affordability: Pricing Insights Launching at an introductory price of $249.99, the Arc B580 represents a strategic move from Intel to capture market attention in the competitive budget segment. Its pricing demonstrates a balance between performance and affordability, catering to an audience eager for high-quality graphics at a reasonable cost. Supply Challenges and Market Response Despite its promising features, securing an Arc B580 has proven difficult, with the initial release quickly selling out on platforms like Newegg. This scarcity has only heightened anticipation for restocks, anticipated in early January 2025. Retailers like Amazon and B&H have resorted to pre-order models to manage the high demand. Upcoming Releases: The Arc B570 Alternative For those unable to acquire the Arc B580, Intel plans to release a more affordable variant, the Arc B570, on December 16. This model will offer a more accessible entry into Intel’s advanced GPU technology, allowing a broader audience to experience its groundbreaking innovations. Predictions: The Future of Intel Graphics Cards As Intel continues to develop its graphics card technology, the Arc series is expected to expand further, potentially challenging established giants in the industry. Forecasts suggest that Intel’s continued innovation could lead to more robust and affordable options in future GPU lineups. Security and Sustainability Aspects Intel’s GPUs are designed with security as a priority, promising robust protection against vulnerabilities. Moreover, the Arc B580’s efficient power management indicates a step towards sustainability by reducing the environmental impact while maintaining performance. For more information on Intel’s technological innovations and product releases, visit their official website .

Jimmy Carter, the earnest Georgia peanut farmer who as US president struggled with a bad economy and the Iran hostage crisis but brokered peace between Israel and Egypt and later received the Nobel Peace Prize for his humanitarian work, died at his home in Plains, Georgia, on Sunday, the Carter Center said. He was 100. “My father was a hero, not only to me but to everyone who believes in peace, human rights, and unselfish love,” said Chip Carter, the former president’s son. “My brothers, sister, and I shared him with the rest of the world through these common beliefs. The world is our family because of the way he brought people together, and we thank you for honoring his memory by continuing to live these shared beliefs.” A Democrat, he served as president from January 1977 to January 1981 after defeating incumbent Republican President Gerald Ford in the 1976 US election. Carter was swept from office four years later in an electoral landslide as voters embraced Republican challenger Ronald Reagan, the former actor and California governor. Carter lived longer after his term in office than any other US president. Along the way, he earned a reputation as a better former president than he was a president - a status he readily acknowledged. His one-term presidency was marked by the highs of the 1978 Camp David accords between Israel and Egypt, bringing some stability to the Middle East. But it was dogged by an economy in recession, persistent unpopularity and the embarrassment of the Iran hostage crisis that consumed his final 444 days in office. In recent years, Carter had experienced several health issues including melanoma that spread to his liver and brain. Carter decided to receive hospice care in February 2023 instead of undergoing additional medical intervention. His wife, Rosalynn Carter, died on Nov. 19, 2023, at age 96. He looked frail when he attended her memorial service and funeral in a wheelchair. Carter left office profoundly unpopular but worked energetically for decades on humanitarian causes. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 in recognition of his "untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development." Carter had been a centrist as governor of Georgia with populist tendencies when he moved into the White House as the 39th US president. He was a Washington outsider at a time when America was still reeling from the Watergate scandal that led Republican Richard Nixon to resign as president in 1974 and elevated Ford from vice president. "I'm Jimmy Carter and I'm running for president. I will never lie to you," Carter promised with an ear-to-ear smile. Asked to assess his presidency, Carter said in a 1991 documentary: "The biggest failure we had was a political failure. I never was able to convince the American people that I was a forceful and strong leader." Despite his difficulties in office, Carter had few rivals for accomplishments as a former president. He gained global acclaim as a tireless human rights advocate, a voice for the disenfranchised and a leader in the fight against hunger and poverty, winning the respect that eluded him in the White House. Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002 for his efforts to promote human rights and resolve conflicts around the world, from Ethiopia and Eritrea to Bosnia and Haiti. His Carter Center in Atlanta sent international election-monitoring delegations to polls around the world. A Southern Baptist Sunday school teacher since his teens, Carter brought a strong sense of morality to the presidency, speaking openly about his religious faith. He also sought to take some pomp out of an increasingly imperial presidency - walking, rather than riding in a limousine, in his 1977 inauguration parade. The Middle East was the focus of Carter's foreign policy. The 1979 Egypt-Israel peace treaty, based on the 1978 Camp David accords, ended a state of war between the two neighbours. Carter brought Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin to the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland for talks. Later, as the accords seemed to be unravelling, Carter saved the day by flying to Cairo and Jerusalem for personal shuttle diplomacy. The treaty provided for Israeli withdrawal from Egypt's Sinai Peninsula and establishment of diplomatic relations. Begin and Sadat each won a Nobel Peace Prize in 1978. By the 1980 election, the overriding issues were double-digit inflation, interest rates that exceeded 20% and soaring gas prices, as well as the Iran hostage crisis that brought humiliation to America. These issues marred Carter's presidency and undermined his chances of winning a second term. On November 4, 1979, revolutionaries devoted to Iran's Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini had stormed the US Embassy in Tehran, seized the Americans present and demanded the return of the ousted shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was backed by the United States and was being treated in a US hospital. The American public initially rallied behind Carter. But his support faded in April 1980 when a commando raid failed to rescue the hostages, with eight US soldiers killed in an aircraft accident in the Iranian desert. Carter's final ignominy was that Iran held the 52 hostages until minutes after Reagan took his oath of office on January 20, 1981, to replace Carter, then released the planes carrying them to freedom. In another crisis, Carter protested the former Soviet Union's 1979 invasion of Afghanistan by boycotting the 1980 Olympics in Moscow. He also asked the US Senate to defer consideration of a major nuclear arms accord with Moscow. Unswayed, the Soviets remained in Afghanistan for a decade. Carter won narrow Senate approval in 1978 of a treaty to transfer the Panama Canal to the control of Panama despite critics who argued the waterway was vital to American security. He also completed negotiations on full US ties with China. Carter created two new US Cabinet departments - education and energy. Amid high gas prices, he said America's "energy crisis" was "the moral equivalent of war" and urged the country to embrace conservation. "Ours is the most wasteful nation on earth," he told Americans in 1977. In 1979, Carter delivered what became known as his "malaise" speech to the nation, although he never used that word. "After listening to the American people I have been reminded again that all the legislation in the world can't fix what's wrong with America," he said in his televised address. "The threat is nearly invisible in ordinary ways. It is a crisis of confidence. It is a crisis that strikes at the very heart and soul and spirit of our national will. The erosion of our confidence in the future is threatening to destroy the social and the political fabric of America." As president, the strait-laced Carter was embarrassed by the behaviour of his hard-drinking younger brother, Billy Carter, who had boasted: "I got a red neck, white socks, and Blue Ribbon beer." Jimmy Carter withstood a challenge from Massachusetts Senator Edward Kennedy for the 1980 Democratic presidential nomination but was politically diminished heading into his general election battle against a vigorous Republican adversary. Reagan, the conservative who projected an image of strength, kept Carter off balance during their debates before the November 1980 election. Reagan dismissively told Carter, "There you go again," when the Republican challenger felt the president had misrepresented Reagan's views during one debate. Carter lost the 1980 election to Reagan, who won 44 of the 50 states and amassed an Electoral College landslide. James Earl Carter Jr. was born on October 1, 1924, in Plains, Georgia, one of four children of a farmer and shopkeeper. He graduated from the US Naval Academy in 1946, served in the nuclear submarine program and left to manage the family peanut farming business. He married his wife, Rosalynn, in 1946, a union he called "the most important thing in my life." They had three sons and a daughter. Carter became a millionaire, a Georgia state legislator and Georgia's governor from 1971 to 1975. He mounted an underdog bid for the 1976 Democratic presidential nomination, and out-hustled his rivals for the right to face Ford in the general election. With Walter Mondale as his vice presidential running mate, Carter was given a boost by a major Ford gaffe during one of their debates. Ford said that "there is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe and there never will be under a Ford administration," despite decades of just such domination. Carter edged Ford in the election, even though Ford actually won more states - 27 to Carter's 23. Not all of Carter's post-presidential work was appreciated. Former President George W. Bush and his father, former President George H.W. Bush, both Republicans, were said to have been displeased by Carter's freelance diplomacy in Iraq and elsewhere. In 2004, Carter called the Iraq war launched in 2003 by the younger Bush one of the most "gross and damaging mistakes our nation ever made." He called George W. Bush's administration "the worst in history" and said Vice President Dick Cheney was "a disaster for our country." In 2019, Carter questioned Republican Donald Trump's legitimacy as president, saying "he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf." Trump responded by calling Carter "a terrible president." Carter also made trips to communist North Korea. A 1994 visit defused a nuclear crisis, as President Kim Il Sung agreed to freeze his nuclear program in exchange for resumed dialogue with the United States. That led to a deal in which North Korea, in return for aid, promised not to restart its nuclear reactor or reprocess the plant's spent fuel. But Carter irked Democratic President Bill Clinton's administration by announcing the deal with North Korea's leader without first checking with Washington. In 2010, Carter won the release of an American sentenced to eight years hard labor for illegally entering North Korea. Carter wrote more than two dozen books, ranging from a presidential memoir to a children's book and poetry, as well as works about religious faith and diplomacy. His book "Faith: A Journey for All," was published in 2018. (Reuters)

Ukraine must be in strong position for negotiations, Starmer to say

New Delhi, Dec 15 (IANS): Collaboration between Centre and state, innovation, and public-private partnerships are key to achieving the 2047 goals of a Viksit Bharat, said Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Science and Technology Jitendra Singh on Sunday. He said this while chairing the monthly Joint Ministerial Meeting of the Secretaries of all the Science Ministries and Departments of the Government in the national capital. Singh called for aligning all the government departments as well as the Centre and State efforts with a "whole of Government" and "whole of Science" approach to transform India into "Viksit Bharat" by 2047. He called for cooperative federalism in science and stressed the need to integrate all the stakeholders to create a sustainable and progressive ecosystem. The meeting served as a key platform for evaluating ongoing programmes and discussing future strategies to strengthen India’s scientific ecosystem. Singh also emphasised the vital role of State Scientific Councils in fostering innovation, advancing regional development, and contributing to national goals. “State Scientific Councils must rise to the occasion and play their part in achieving the vision of Viksit Bharat. By working together, we can harness the full potential of our scientific resources to transform India into a developed nation by 2047,” the minister added. He urged states to act as catalysts for cultivating a scientific temperament, promoting grassroots innovation, and leveraging local expertise to address unique challenges. The Union Minister also highlighted the importance of market capitalisation for innovations emerging from India’s scientific agencies. “Scientific innovation must not remain confined to laboratories. It should translate into impactful, market-ready solutions that empower industries and improve lives,” he stated. “By effectively marketing technologies, India could establish itself as a global leader in innovation and technology-led solutions,” Singh added. He also advocated for frameworks that enable public-private collaboration to fast-track the commercialisation of lab-scale breakthroughs. The Union minister stressed that such partnerships are essential for bridging the gap between research and real-world applications, ensuring that innovations are accessible, scalable, and impactful.China launched an antitrust investigation into Nvidia Corporation NVDA regarding its acquisition of Israeli networking company Mellanox Technologies , approved in 2020, and its potential violations of China’s anti-monopoly laws . European regulators have launched an investigation into a clandestine advertising arrangement between Alphabet Inc.’s GOOG Google and Meta Platforms Inc. META that reportedly circumvented Google's own advertising policies for minors . The White House announced that Micron Technology Inc. MU has received a substantial investment of over $6.1 billion. The investment will support the construction of advanced memory chip facilities in Clay, New York, and Boise, Idaho . Gaming, Technology & Semiconductors CD Projekt ADR has confirmed that Cyberpunk 2077 will receive a significant new update on Dec. 10, 2024, coinciding with the game’s four-year anniversary . Read : Still No GTA 6 News? Fans Take Matters Into Their Own Hands TikTok -parent ByteDance has reportedly become the largest buyer of Nvidia chips in Asia, outpacing rivals like Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. BABA and Baidu Inc . BIDU . Tesla Inc. TSLA has officially rolled out Apple Inc. AAPL Watch app, allowing users to transform their watch into a digital key for their vehicle . Google has reportedly requested the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to dismantle Microsoft Corporation's MSFT exclusive agreement to host OpenAI's technology on its cloud servers . Read : Trump Announces Plans To Have Dinner With Amazon Founder Jeff Bezos As Billionaire Rivals Turn Unexpected Allies After Years Of Clashes As the race to introduce artificial intelligence features rages on, Alphabet unveiled a new prototype on Wednesday that could reshape the AI marketplace . Smartphones Apple is facing a $1.2 billion lawsuit filed on Saturday in U.S. District Court in Northern California for discontinuing its child sexual abuse material detection feature . Apple announced expansion plans in Saudi Arabia, marking a significant step in its Middle East growth strategy. The tech giant will launch its first Arabic-language online store in the summer of 2025, followed by multiple flagship retail locations starting in 2026 . Read : Not All iPhone Charging Cables Are Safe: Here’s How Hackers Turned Them Into Tools Of Espionage Apple is reportedly set to introduce satellite texting and a non-invasive blood pressure tool in its upcoming Watch Ultra . Apple announced the release of iOS 18.2, iPadOS 18.2 and macOS Sequoia 15.2 on Wednesday morning, continuing its slow rollout of its AI- powered Apple Intelligence to devices . Artificial Intelligence (AI) Elon Musk has raised concerns about OpenAI's potential decision to remove a clause that limits Microsoft Corporation from accessing its most advanced AI models upon achieving artificial general intelligence . OpenAI CEO Sam Altman unveiled what he calls an "early" but transformative step in AI video technology. The new tool, likened to "GPT-1 for video," promises an accessible co-creation experience and is already sparking excitement among early adopters . OpenAI CFO Sarah Friar has characterized President-elect Donald Trump as the "president of this AI generation," while downplaying public threats from Elon Musk . © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.Leaking Enbridge pipeline spills nearly 70K gallons of oil in Wisconsin

SHAREHOLDER INVESTIGATION: Halper Sadeh LLC Investigates LBRDA, BERY, ROIC, PFC on Behalf of Shareholders

5 ways to tell if you’re on track for retirement — and 5 things to do if you need to catch up, according to expertsNeal Maupay: Whenever I’m having a bad day I check Everton score and smile

Private medical colleges barred from charging next year's fees

New jurisprudence of social media will soon become our need: R. VenkatraramaniNHL insider Elliotte Friedman has confirmed that the Edmonton Oilers roster will look much different after the trade deadline, and provided their latest trade candidates. The Oilers have just claimed Alec Regula off waivers and sent down Travis Dermott , but it's respected they'll make a much higher impact move before the playoffs. On Sportsnet Radio today, Friedman confirmed the Oilers will acquire a defenceman before the trade deadline, and listed 8 potential candidates. Many of these named the Oilers have been connected to before, but a few are newly reported to be available for trade at all, and could be very interesting options. Elliotte Friedman Reveals New Defenceman Available for Trade, Potential Fits for Edmonton Oilers The Oilers have been connected to the bigger name veterans on this list, Cam Fowler, Ivan Provorov, and Rasmus Andersson. Insider Bob Stauffer has recently connected Cam Fowler to the Edmonton Oilers , and Blue Jackets blueliner Ivan Provorov has been linked to the Oilers as well. Rasmus Andersson would be a great fit, but the Flames ownership would reportedly deny a trade to their rival Edmonton . Perhaps the most interesting player listed is Anaheim Ducks defenceman Pavel Mintyukov. Drafted 10th overall in the 2022 draft, the left shot Russian defenceman has already played 86 NHL games by the age of 21. Mintyukov has produced great analytical results on a brutal Anaheim team in the last two seasons, and if they were to move him, the Oilers could be interested in acquiring him as a long term piece for their defence. The remaining candidates listed are mostly veteran defensive defenceman: Will Borgen, David Savard, Brian Dumoulin, and Alec Martinez. All players of this group, outside of Martinez, can struggle to make a good first pass - and that's an important skill in Edmonton. Adding any of the players listed would vastly improve the Oilers blueline as it is today, and it's great to hear that Edmonton is fully committed to making that addition. Hopefully their scouting department nails down the best fit for the Oilers, and they get the best possible addition for another long playoff run. This article first appeared on Oilers Daily and was syndicated with permission.

First two candidates for New York Jets general manager job revealed... with interviews set to take place this week READ MORE: Travis Hunter is crowned 2024 Heisman Trophy winner By BEN NAGLE Published: 15:20 GMT, 15 December 2024 | Updated: 15:20 GMT, 15 December 2024 e-mail View comments The New York Jets ' rebuild is well underway, with officials set to begin interviews for the team's next general manager this week. Aaron Rodgers and Co have endured an awful season to date and currently sit with a 3-10 record, six weeks after firing head coach Robert Saleh and then GM Joe Douglas. After wiping the slate clean, the first candidates for the new general manager have been identified, with former Tennessee Titans GM Jon Robinson high on the list. ESPN analyst Louis Riddick, who previously worked in the front offices of the Commanders and Eagles, has also been cited as a potential option. ESPN report that the Jets plan to announce or confirm each general manager interview after it is completed, but Robinson's is expected to take place this week. The Jets will not be in a hurry to decide on the next coach and GM, and it has been claimed that they do not mind in which order they make their hires. Jon Robinson (center) is among the top candidates for the New York Jets GM position ESPN analyst Louis Riddick is also expected to be interviewed in the coming weeks The GM hiring process, particularly, could be a lengthy one, given that candidates who are currently already with other NFL organizations cannot interview with a different team until the regular season is over. Given Robinson is not currently with a team, after leaving the Titans in 2022, he is available to interview any time - and would arrive with an impressive resume after his time in Tennessee. Robinson oversaw the Titans' drafting of running back Derrick Henry and wide receiver AJ Brown, and never had a losing season during his time with the team. Jets owner Woody Johnson is reportedly not in a hurry to bring in his new head coach and GM In seven years with him at the helm, the Titans made the playoffs four times, and his firing in December 2022 left fans and players alike stunned. He is the franchise's second-winningest general manager of all-time, with 69 wins, second only to Floyd Reese (111), per ESPN. Last month, the Jets hired 'The 33rd Team' to support them in their search for a new head coach and GM. Led by former Jets GM Mike Tannenbaum and former Vikings GM Rick Spielman, the technology and media company are providing data analysis and experience to assist in the hiring process. New York Jets Tennessee Titans Aaron Rodgers Share or comment on this article: First two candidates for New York Jets general manager job revealed... with interviews set to take place this week e-mail Add commentStaff reporter Hong Kong government's investment arm will reach out to overseas enterprises that have cutting-edge technology as well as research prowess, its chief executive said. And as the new energy industry offers great potential, the Hong Kong Investment Corporation is also helping new energy firms to tap into the Southeast Asian market, set production bases in the Greater Bay Area and trade with Western countries, chief executive Clara Chan Ka-chai said. She said the HKIC aims to deliver medium to long-term returns while boosting the city's competitiveness by attracting overseas enterprises, talent and capital, promoting Hong Kong's brand to the world. When selecting suitable firms, the HKIC aims to maximize the impact of its investments and will strictly assess whether the financial situation and business of these firms meet the city's needs and whether they can contribute to Hong Kong's economy. The HKIC invests in the future, focusing on nurturing young talent and supporting entrepreneurs and scientists in developing innovations that meet industry needs, Chan said. It sees strong collaboration opportunities with Southeast Asia and the Middle East in capital and user applications and a HKIC delegation plans to visit Southeast Asia in the first half of next year and the Middle East in the second half, Chan added.Travis Hunter named AP player of the year

Despite the immense potential for solar energy in urban areas of the Philippines, the technology's upfront cost and a lack of public awareness of its benefits remain major hurdles to its widespread use. Government subsidies and promotional campaigns are seen to help boost its adoption. A study from the Ateneo de Manila University highlights the persistent challenges preventing widespread adoption of rooftop solar power (RTSP) in Metro Manila and nearby provinces. Conducted by Department of Economics Professor Rosalina Palanca-Tan and published in the journal, , the study surveyed 403 respondents to understand why households remain reluctant to invest in solar technology despite its undisputed economic and environmental benefits. Major selling points: Long-term savings, eco-friendliness The Philippines has some of the highest electricity rates in Southeast Asia—as high as $0.20 (approximately ₱11.50) per kilowatt-hour on average, compared to as low as $0.08 (~₱4.50) in Vietnam or even $0.06 (~₱3.50) in Malaysia. This makes the potential long-term savings from RTSP its biggest selling point for many households. Homeowners also recognize that contributes to by reducing and air pollution, helping combat the effects of climate change. Overall, the respondents generally viewed RTSP as a sound long-term investment, with added advantages such as increased property value and enhanced roof durability. However, the upfront cost of installing solar panels remains a major hurdle to public adoption: a home RTSP setup could easily go for well over $1,700 (₱100,000), equivalent to more than half a year's salary for minimum wage workers. Many households are unsure if this initial expense is justified by long-term financial and environmental returns. In any case, cost by itself does not significantly influence adoption decisions, the Ateneo survey found. Respondents said that the trustworthiness of providers, clarity on warranties, and the perceived quality of the installations themselves were just as important considerations as cost, if not more so. Government support to spur public adoption Although 82% of surveyed households expressed some interest in adopting , only 20% had firm intentions of doing so. This gap apparently stems from a lack of knowledge: while most survey respondents said they understood the broad concept of renewable energy and its role in addressing climate change, few were aware of the specific advantages of RTSPs and how to access reliable installation services. Concerns over the quality of materials, maintenance needs, and provider credibility also added to their reluctance. Thus, the study urges stronger government intervention and public education campaigns. In particular, the study suggests improving net metering rates, expanding access to financing options, and accrediting trustworthy RTSP providers to build consumer confidence. Word-of-mouth recommendations also proved instrumental in , as households with friends or family who had adopted solar power were more likely to consider it for themselves as well. Promoting and community-based testimonials could be a crucial key to shifting perceptions and increasing rates of RSTP in the Philippines.India News | Actress Shilpa Shetty Donates Mechanical Elephant to Jagadguru Renukacharya Temple in K'taka

In the months leading up to the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. intelligence community’s alarms were blaring. By late 2021, analysts were almost certain of Russia’s intent to dramatically escalate. A flurry of statements and de-classified intelligence attempted to mobilize action in the face of a potentially dire invasion. In the public sphere, organizations using open-sourced intelligence noticed conspicuous preparations, including blood drives and pontoon bridges . Despite overwhelming evidence presented by the intelligence community, media, and open-source researchers, Ukrainian leadership was skeptical . Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy worried Western warnings would hurt the Ukrainian economy and cause social instability. It was not until just hours before Russian forces crossed the border that Zelenskyy acknowledged the risk and ordered earnest preparations to begin. While the tactical warning achieved by Ukraine was sufficient to prevent the complete destruction of its air fleet and air defense network, Ukraine would have fared far better had it heeded Washington’s warnings weeks before. An important lesson from this episode is the difficulty of communicating risk to societies already living under latent but perpetual fear of invasion and diagnosing intent in strategic warning. Nowhere in the world is this lesson more relevant than in the Taiwan-U.S. security relationship. China has been watching Ukraine closely, taking its own notes. There is little doubt Beijing has learned much not only from Russia’s failure to conceal its activity in the lead-up to the invasion – but also from how long Ukrainian society took to accept the reality of invasion and mobilize in response to it. Currently, the way that the United States and Taiwan have approached messaging about risk is wrong. Even if Washington had clear knowledge of a Chinese plan to invade, how would it communicate risk to Taiwan when the ceaseless, existential, “ five alarm fire ” has been anything but? The practice of talking down to the Taiwanese public must end. Despite extensive discourse about invasion threats, polling has consistently shown that Taiwanese citizens maintain different threat perceptions from those assessed by Washington. Instead of dismissing these views, U.S. policymakers need to understand why this disconnect exists. The true risk is that if the United States and Taiwan continue on this course and the time for true panic arises, Taipei, and more importantly, the people of Taiwan, aren’t likely to answer the phone. Essential to Washington’s complicated relationship with Taiwan is the messaging that occurs within the United States. There is no shortage of articles explaining why Taiwan matters , or even why it really, really matters . There are countless definitive remedies prescribing what Taiwan needs and how the United States should go about making it happen. However, much of this discussion is predicated on the ability to predict China’s movements, a flawed assumption that risks disastrous policy failure. The problem of communicating risk comes from both ends: like Washington, Taipei shares some of the blame. Continuous posting about Air Defense Identification Zone violations by China’s military as a metric to assess Beijing’s movements and predict action is full of confounders. We saw this after the hype over balloon overflights into Taiwanese airspace in late 2023 and early 2024 was shown to be little more than hot air . This pattern does nothing but reinforce the cycle of creating urgency over a potential threat and not following through with any action. Without interdictive action, Taiwan drawing attention to China’s intrusions creates its own problem. Like the little boy who cried wolf, ringing the alarm bell every time China commits a technical but ultimately quotidian violation sets Taiwan up to miss legitimate threats and erodes U.S. credibility in the region. The problem extends beyond Taiwan-U.S. relations: Risks of a communication failure spill over to regional alliances. South Korea, Japan , and the Philippines have their own security considerations, and there has been skepticism regarding involvement , something that will certainly accelerate should the United States fail to accurately diagnose intent Perhaps more important for Washington than accurately communicating risk to Taiwan is convincing itself. Policymakers in Washington must have confidence in the assessments of the United States’ own intelligence community. Preparations for an invasion, should the U.S. seek to intervene to defend Taiwan, would be considerable . Air defense would be surged to bases in the region, air wings and forces would have to be dispersed and re-organized, and the U.S. economy must be prepared for considerable shocks due to trade disruption. These preparations require time, and potentially more importantly, certainty. If, judging an invasion was imminent, the United States was to make rapid changes to its force posture, there is a danger it could reveal its hand in the face of what is actually a drill or feint by China. Should this occur, Washington could give substantial information to the Chinese government, information that would greatly facilitate Beijing’s war-planning and its ability to predict how the United States might react to a blockade or invasion. Perhaps more importantly, it would undermine the credibility of signaling, possibly de-railing attempts to build a coalition to defend Taiwan or send critical humanitarian aid. Understanding this dilemma, China will likely employ deception to greatly confuse the United States and Taiwan’s ability to predict intent. This could be accomplished by several means, including public disinformation campaigns, fake or distorted movements to confuse geospatial intelligence, or conducting several large-scale drills around the time of the intended action. Regional allies are crucial for any effective deterrence strategy, but current U.S. messaging often undermines these relationships. When Washington emphasizes the importance of protecting treaty allies against diagnosed threats without decisive action, it erodes credibility with regional partners. These relationships require development through consistent support on issues that matter to them – whether it’s North Korean provocations or South China Sea disputes. Building trust through reliable partnership on these issues will strengthen regional solidarity when it comes to Taiwan. Avoiding this trap requires a paradigm shift, one that understands the natural restraints of the United States and Taiwan’s ability to shape the behavior of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). It requires policymakers and academics alike to reject falling for media hype campaigns, and reject Beijing’s use of military maneuvers around the island to de-legitimize deterrence. Taiwan, the United States, and its allies in the region should adopt a healthy dose of skepticism in its assessments of PLA action around the island. The recent confusion stemming from Taiwanese Ministry of National Defense reports of large PLA Navy movements surrounding Taiwan are evidence of this. Building up these drills and exercises as provocations to be responded to only plays into the PLA’s hand by associating these actions as legitimate acts to “dominate” Taiwan. When everything the PLA does around Taiwan is articulated as a gray-zone tactic that seeks to undermine Taiwan’s ability to defend itself, nothing will ever be considered important enough to drive Taiwanese society into real action – until it’s too late. Preventing this means developing a framework that distinguishes between routine military activities, genuine provocations, and actual invasion preparations. Such clarity would allow for more measured responses and help preserve credibility when raising genuine security concerns. There are some that argue that because Taiwan isn’t doing enough , or isn’t serious , that Washington should continue its approach. But in emphasizing the need for immediate action and putting constant pressure on the Taiwanese populace creates political instability, which politicians attempt to alleviate with big ticket purchases such as aircraft and naval vessels that won’t survive the early hours of conflict. This strategy detracts from investment in domestic capacity and long-term military reform such as asymmetric defense. This creates a never-ending obsession with getting newer and flashier military technology rather than going to the roots of the problem of military modernization for Taiwan. These issues highlight a central problem in intelligence analysis: For fear of missing critical warnings and indications of attack, we often get duped by deliberate misinformation and feints. To mitigate the problem, the U.S. intelligence community should focus more on refining assessments than on collecting information. It is clear that there will be signs of a blockade or invasion, as it is simply impossible to hide all levels of preparation. What is less certain, however, is if intent can be parsed through a flood of incoming information and data. The challenge isn’t finding a needle in a haystack. Rather, it is about identifying the right needle in a warehouse of them. To alleviate some of these problems, the United States should cooperate more closely with Taiwan’s populace and intelligence community. Training pilots and soldiers helps Taiwan’s military but addressing early warning issues and risks upstream is far more effective than stopping the flood with sandbags in front yards. This, along with a shift away from the emphasis on trying to understand and predict gray-zone activity, can provide a more robust analytical capacity and avoid being drawn into Beijing’s misinformation campaigns surrounding intent and risk.