www mnl777 co
www mnl777 co
US Supreme Court allows multibillion-dollar class action against MetaHailee Steinfeld has been a Gen-Z icon since Pitch Perfect 2 , but the actress and singer has been working since her teens. After booking her role as the headstrong and determined Mattie in True Grit , Hailee rose to fame and branched out in other parts of the entertainment industry. As a result of her hard work — and grit — Hailee’s net worth steadily rose. And now that she’s engaged to fiancé Josh Allen , fans are curious how the actress and the athlete’s earnings compare. However, none of that matters to the engaged duo; they’re simply looking forward to starting the next chapter of their lives. Before finding love with Josh, Hailee spoke to PEOPLE in 2023 about the kind of future relationship she preferred. The publication noted that she was single at the time of her interview. “I ultimately want someone who supports me, and who I can support and cheer on and be their biggest fan,” Hailee said. “I’ve been lucky enough to spend so much time with my family recently, and I have so many shining examples of what it should feel like to be with someone that makes you a better you and happy. I’m not really looking, so I don’t have a list of things. But I think the right person comes along when they do, and I imagine that’s the greatest thing ever.” Calling love an “exciting thought” to her, the Hawkeye alum also pointed out that she felt “confident in who [she is] than ever” before and was happy building her career. Find out where Hailee’s net worth stands in 2024, below. How Does Hailee Steinfeld Make Money? Hailee earns money through her film acting work as well as her music career. She has starred in numerous film and TV roles, with some of her most popular ones being True Grit, the Pitch Perfect series, Hawkeye and Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse . As for her singing career, Hailee released several iconic songs, including “Starving” and “Most Girls.” Some of her music has been streamed over a billion times. What Is Hailee Seinfeld’s Net Worth in 2024? Hailee has a net worth of $22 million as of November 2024, according to Celebrity Net Worth . What Is Josh Allen’s Net Worth in 2024? As of November 2024, Josh has a net worth of $70 million, with a salary of $40 million, per Celebrity Net Worth . According to multiple outlets , the NFL star was offered a contract extension worth more than $250 million in 2021. How Is Net Worth Determined? A celebrity’s net worth is determined by calculating the value of their assets and subtracting what they owe, according to Bankrate. A person’s assets can include a home, a vehicle, stocks, bonds and other owned expenses.
As we age, our cognitive and motor functions degrade, reducing our independence and overall quality of life. Research efforts to mitigate or perhaps eliminate this have resulted in technologies that hold a lot of promise. Now, scientists led by Friedhelm Hummel at EPFL have identified an important factor affecting an individual’s responsiveness to atDCS. The team looked at how native learning abilities determine the effect of brain stimulation applied while learning a motor task. Their findings suggest that individuals with less efficient learning mechanisms benefit more from stimulation, while those with optimal learning strategies might experience negative effects. Among these is non-invasive brain stimulation: a term encompassing a set of techniques that can affect brain functions externally and noninvasively, without the need for surgery or implants. One such promising technique, in particular, is anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS), which uses a constant, low electrical current delivered via electrodes on the scalp to modulate neuronal activity. However, studies exploring atDCS have produced inconsistent results, which has prompted researchers to explore why some people benefit from atDCS while others don’t. The problem seems to lie in our understanding of factors that may influence responsiveness to brain stimulation, leading to responders and non-responders; among these, age has been suggested as one important factor. Some studies suggest further factors such as baseline behavioural abilities and previous training might be important considerations, but an interplay of these factors with behaviour has not been determined in detail, pointing to the need of refined predictive models of the effects of atDCS. The researchers recruited 40 participants: 20 middle-aged adults (50-65 years old) and 20 older adults (over 65). Each group was further divided into those receiving active atDCS and those receiving placebo stimulation. Over ten days, participants practised a finger-tapping task designed to study motor sequence learning at home while receiving atDCS. The task involved replicating a numerical sequence using a keypad, trying to be as fast and as accurate as possible. The team then used a machine-learning model trained on a public dataset to classify participants as either “optimal” or “suboptimal” learners, based on their initial performance. This model aimed to predict who would benefit from atDCS, based on their ability to integrate information about the task efficiently early during training. The study found that suboptimal learners, who were seemingly less efficient at internalizing the task at the early stages of learning, experienced an accelerated accuracy improvement while performing the task when receiving atDCS. This effect was not limited to people of a certain age (e.g., older adults), with suboptimal learners being found among younger individuals as well. In contrast, participants with optimal learning strategies, regardless of age, even showed a negative trend in performance when receiving atDCS. This difference suggests that brain stimulation is more beneficial for individuals who initially struggle with motor tasks. As such, atDCS seems to possess a restorative rather than an enhancing quality, with important implications for rehabilitation. “By leveraging different methods in Machine learning, we were able to untangle the influence of different factors on the individual effects of brain stimulation,” said Pablo Maceira, the study’s first author. “This will pave the way to maximize the effects of brain stimulation in individual subjects and patients.” The study implies that, in the long run, personalized brain stimulation protocols will be developed to maximize benefits based on an individual’s specific needs, rather than a common trait such as age. This approach could lead to more effective brain stimulation-based interventions, targeting specific mechanisms supporting learning, especially in the view of neurorehabilitation, for which the main basis is the re-learning of lost skills due to a brain lesion (e.g., after a stroke or a traumatic brain injury). “In the future, clinicians could apply a more advanced version of our algorithm to determine whether a patient will benefit from a brain stimulation-based therapy, to enhance the effects of neurorehabilitation and personalize treatment,” said Hummel. (With inputs from ANI)Shakespeare’s timeless masterpiece, Othello, cautions us that certain things are better left unaltered. The phrase “Let it alone” serves as a poignant reminder to preserve the integrity of what is already exemplary. The recent proposal by the Federal Executive Council to rechristen the University of Abuja as Yakubu Gowon University is a decision that should evoke profound concern among all patriotic Nigerians, particularly those who cherish national unity, identity, and educational heritage. The idea of renaming the University of Abuja to Yakubu Gowon University since the announcement has sparked intense debate and protests from students, indigenous people of Abuja and other stakeholders. This move is part of a larger political culture of changing the names of tertiary institutions to immortalize politicians, which is highly unnecessary, especially for schools that have lived for decades. Universities are brands that have been built over decades, and changing their names can confuse foreign employers and academic institutions. For instance, if a university’s name were to be changed, it would be a challenge for graduates and raise questions about the validity of certificates issued to graduates. Moreover, renaming a university can be a complex issue. It’s essential to consider the potential consequences and ensure that any changes align with the institution’s values and mission. This is particularly important for institutions like the University of Abuja, which has established a strong reputation over the years and is known for unity and scholarship. It’s puzzling why anyone would risk damaging the reputation of a university for political gain. There are alternative ways to honour notable individuals, such as naming national symbols, or infrastructure after them. This approach would allow us to recognise the contributions of notable individuals without compromising the identity and heritage of our universities. This rejection is not driven by political resentment and as a matter of fact, this writer is a staunch member of APC but by a desire to maintain the integrity and recognition of Nigerian universities worldwide. In Social Exchange Theory, we are taught that honouring individuals for their achievements in office is not a bad omen. However, considering Gowon’s role in establishing five universities in his time as Head of State between 1966-1975, including the University of Jos, wouldn’t it be more fitting to rename the University of Jos after him instead? This approach would not only honour Gowon’s legacy but also acknowledge his contributions to the establishment of the University of Jos. Renaming the University of Abuja, on the other hand, might be seen as erasing its unique identity and the values it represents. Isn’t it worth considering alternative ways to honour Gowon’s legacy, such as naming a new institution, a major landmark after him or the unity schools? This argument isn’t about diminishing General Yakubu Gowon’s remarkable legacy. As a revered elder statesman and gentleman, he played a pivotal role in preserving Nigeria’s unity during the Civil War, and his contributions undoubtedly deserve recognition and immortalisation. Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the best President we never had was deservedly honoured with the rechristening of the former University of Ife after him in 1987. This was in acknowledgement of his visionary endeavour in conceptualising and developing that iconic institution, which once held the record of arguably the most beautiful university campus in Africa. The erstwhile University of Ife was one of Awolowo’s several heroics in the consummation of the growth of the old Western region. However, honouring Gowon’s legacy shouldn’t come at the expense of dismantling an institution that embodies the very unity he fought tirelessly to preserve. Related News Deputy Senate president restates N'Assembly's commitment to oversight functions Group hails Badaru over collaboration with security agencies AFAN advocates increased support for Bayelsa farmers The National Assembly, stakeholders of higher education and every Nigerian who believes in the power of unity and heritage, I implore you to reject this proposal as students and stakeholders of the University of Lagos resisted and rebelled against the attempt by the government of former President Goodluck Jonathan to re-designate the school after Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola in 2012. They voted loud and clear for the retention of the preexisting name and brand. The University of Abuja is not just another institution; it is a living embodiment of our national aspiration. Its name carries the weight of hope, and possibility, a Nigeria that can transcend its differences. The name ‘University of Abuja’ is more than a geographical descriptor. It is a brand, an identity, a promise. It stands shoulder to shoulder with legendary institutions like the University of Nigeria and the University of Lagos — each name a testament to something greater than a single individual. As always said by the immediate past Vice Chancellor of the University, Prof Abdul-Rasheed Na’Allah, UniAbuja is a number one University in Nigeria by accident of location. This institution is more than just a place of learning; it is a symbol of national unity, federal character, and collective identity. To rename it is to undermine these principles and send the wrong message to future generations. Let us preserve the University of Abuja for what it represents: a beacon of hope, unity, and national identity. Let us honour our past leaders in ways that do not compromise the core values and identities that bind us together as a nation. The University of Abuja must remain the University of Abuja. By preserving this name, we safeguard the sanctity of our national unity and ensure that future generations inherit an institution where the diverse spirit of Nigeria is celebrated and truly represented. The proposed name change is not just an administrative decision; it is a potential erosion of a carefully constructed symbol of national unity. The University of Abuja represents what Nigeria can be: diverse, integrated, and respectful of all its constituent parts. Let us protect this and let the University of Abuja remain the University of Abuja — a beacon of hope, a sanctuary of national integration, and a testament to what we can achieve when we see beyond our differences. Our unity is sacred. Our institutions are its guardians. The University of Abuja must remain exactly what it is: A University for all Nigerians. Universities displace indigenous people when you rename universities at a whim. You erase the history of people who identify with that place and what it stands for. I would suggest a national call for a stop to this tradition, not just UniAbuja. Instead, the government can build new infrastructure in those universities and name them after politicians like “Yakubu Gowon Digital Development Mega Library” or Hostels. To President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, you’re a father of the nation and a respected democrat. All the students of the University of Abuja are standing for your mandate, not for the gain of political goodies but in firm belief of your capacity. We hope you will have a rethink on this issue at hand. You have done so well for the nation’s educational sector, with the largest percentage given to education in the 2025 budget, which no one has done before you. In this light, we implore you not to give UniAbuja a new name, let it alone. •Sulayman Nafiu, a student of Law at the University of Abuja, writes via [email protected]WATCH: Do you know these Kilkenny people and places of old?
Desperate shortage of Brit builders ‘risks leaving UK hooked on high migration’ to hit Labour target to build 1.5m homes
LUSAIL, Qatar (AP) — Lando Norris ignored team orders and handed his McLaren teammate Oscar Piastri the sprint race in Qatar on Saturday, while Formula 1 champion Max Verstappen was stripped of the pole position. His penalty elevated George Russell to first on the grid. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.Prime Minister Justin Trudeau posted a video of veteran journalist Tom Brokaw explaining Canada to Americans. It comes after several social media posts by President-elect Donald Trump referring to Trudeau as the governor of America’s 51st state. “Remember, Canada was a British colony. That was a long time ago. But the encryption on the arch sums up the relationship: ‘May these gates never be closed,’” Brokaw says in the video. The video emphasizes the close relations between the two nations, including the shared border, joint military operations, and Canada’s help to rescue American diplomats during the 1979 hostage crisis in Iran. Brokaw notes in the video that the countries both attract immigrants searching for freedom and economic opportunity, and that Canada is one of the biggest trading partners to the United States. “The two-way trade at the Ambassador Bridge between Detroit and Windsor alone equals all American exports to Japan,” he said. The video also notes that Canada is the No. 1 supplier of oil to the United States, and that the top tourist destination for Canadians is the United States. Trump has posted several jibes about Canada becoming the next U.S. state over the past month, after announcing that he will impose a blanket 25 percent tariff on all Canadian imports if the country doesn’t adequately address illegal immigration and drug flow through its border into the United States. Shortly after the announcement, Trudeau made a visit to the president-elect’s home in Mar-a-Lago on Nov. 29. Trump has continued the same comment in subsequent social media posts. “It was a pleasure to have dinner the other night with Governor Justin Trudeau of the Great State of Canada,” Trump wrote Dec. 10 on Truth Social. “I look forward to seeing the Governor again soon so that we may continue our in depth talks on Tariffs and Trade, the results of which will be truly spectacular for all!” Trump has also posted on the platform about encouraging Wayne Gretzky to become prime minister in Canada. “I just left Wayne Gretzky, ‘The Great One’ as he is known in Ice Hockey circles. I said, ‘Wayne, why don’t you run for Prime Minister of Canada, soon to be known as the Governor of Canada—You would win easily, you wouldn’t even have to campaign,’” Trump posted on Dec. 25. Another Dec. 25 post by Trump noted that if Canada were to become the 51st state, taxes would drop by 60 percent. “To Governor Justin Trudeau of Canada, whose Citizens’ Taxes are far too high, but if Canada was to become our 51st State, their Taxes would be cut by more than 60 percent, their businesses would immediately double in size, and they would be militarily protected like no other Country anywhere in the World,” Trump wrote.JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — Walter Payton Award finalist Irv Mulligan had 116 yards rushing, Jackson State took control in the third quarter and the Tigers rolled past Southern 41-13 on Saturday to win the SWAC Championship. Read this article for free: Already have an account? To continue reading, please subscribe: * JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — Walter Payton Award finalist Irv Mulligan had 116 yards rushing, Jackson State took control in the third quarter and the Tigers rolled past Southern 41-13 on Saturday to win the SWAC Championship. Read unlimited articles for free today: Already have an account? JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — Walter Payton Award finalist Irv Mulligan had 116 yards rushing, Jackson State took control in the third quarter and the Tigers rolled past Southern 41-13 on Saturday to win the SWAC Championship. Jackson State (11-2) claimed the conference title for the fourth time and will play MEAC champion South Carolina State in the Celebration Bowl on Dec. 14 in Atlanta. Southern (8-5) led 10-3 late in the second quarter before Jackson State ended the half on an Emari Matthews 2-yard touchdown run and followed it up with Mulligan’s 1-yard TD run to open the third quarter. Now leading 17-10, the Tigers added Gerardo Baeza’s 45-yard field goal and Zy McDonald’s 23-yard touchdown run to take a 27-10 lead into the fourth quarter. Jackson State wrapped up the conference title with two touchdowns in the final 6 1/2 minutes. The Jaguars’ 28-yard field goal by Joshua Griffin in the fourth quarter marked the end of a six-game streak in which Jackson State had not allowed a point in the final period. Also, Southern was only the third team since Oct. 5 to score in the second half against Jackson State. In addition to Muligan’s 116 yards on the ground, McDonald ran for 95 yards and the Tigers totaled 275 yards and four rushing touchdowns. McDonald completed 6 of 11 passes for 75 yards with a touchdown and an interception. Czavian Teasett had 127 yards passing and 56 yards rushing for Southern. __ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football Advertisement
By TOM KRISHER, Associated Press DETROIT (AP) — For a second time, a Delaware judge has nullified a pay package that Tesla had awarded its CEO, Elon Musk, that once was valued at $56 billion. On Monday, Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick turned aside a request from Musk’s lawyers to reverse a ruling she announced in January that had thrown out the compensation plan. The judge ruled then that Musk effectively controlled Tesla’s board and had engineered the outsize pay package during sham negotiations . Lawyers for a Tesla shareholder who sued to block the pay package contended that shareholders who had voted for the 10-year plan in 2018 had been given misleading and incomplete information. In their defense, Tesla’s board members asserted that the shareholders who ratified the pay plan a second time in June had done so after receiving full disclosures, thereby curing all the problems the judge had cited in her January ruling. As a result, they argued, Musk deserved the pay package for having raised Tesla’s market value by billions of dollars. McCormick rejected that argument. In her 103-page opinion, she ruled that under Delaware law, Tesla’s lawyers had no grounds to reverse her January ruling “based on evidence they created after trial.” What will Musk and Tesla do now? On Monday night, Tesla posted on X, the social media platform owned by Musk, that the company will appeal. The appeal would be filed with the Delaware Supreme Court, the only state appellate court Tesla can pursue. Experts say a ruling would likely come in less than a year. “The ruling, if not overturned, means that judges and plaintiffs’ lawyers run Delaware companies rather than their rightful owners — the shareholders,” Tesla argued. Later, on X, Musk unleashed a blistering attack on the judge, asserting that McCormick is “a radical far left activist cosplaying as a judge.” What do experts say about the case? Legal authorities generally suggest that McCormick’s ruling was sound and followed the law. Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, said that in his view, McCormick was right to rule that after Tesla lost its case in the original trial, it created improper new evidence by asking shareholders to ratify the pay package a second time. Had she allowed such a claim, he said, it would cause a major shift in Delaware’s laws against conflicts of interest given the unusually close relationship between Musk and Tesla’s board. “Delaware protects investors — that’s what she did,” said Elson, who has followed the court for more than three decades. “Just because you’re a ‘superstar CEO’ doesn’t put you in a separate category.” Elson said he thinks investors would be reluctant to put money into Delaware companies if there were exceptions to the law for “special people.” What will the Delaware Supreme Court do? Elson said that in his opinion, the court is likely to uphold McCormick’s ruling. Can Tesla appeal to federal courts? Experts say no. Rulings on state laws are normally left to state courts. Brian Dunn, program director for the Institute of Compensation Studies at Cornell University, said it’s been his experience that Tesla has no choice but to stay in the Delaware courts for this compensation package. Tesla has moved its legal headquarters to Texas. Does that matter? The company could try to reconstitute the pay package and seek approval in Texas, where it may expect more friendlier judges. But Dunn, who has spent 40 years as an executive compensation consultant, said it’s likely that some other shareholder would challenge the award in Texas because it’s excessive compared with other CEOs’ pay plans. “If they just want to turn around and deliver him $56 billion, I can’t believe somebody wouldn’t want to litigate it,” Dunn said. “It’s an unconscionable amount of money.” Would a new pay package be even larger? Almost certainly. Tesla stock is trading at 15 times the exercise price of stock options in the current package in Delaware, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas wrote in a note to investors. Tesla’s share price has doubled in the past six months, Jonas wrote. At Monday’s closing stock price, the Musk package is now worth $101.4 billion, according to Equilar, an executive data firm. And Musk has asked for a subsequent pay package that would give him 25% of Tesla’s voting shares. Musk has said he is uncomfortable moving further into artificial intelligence with the company if he doesn’t have 25% control. He currently holds about 13% of Tesla’s outstanding shares.
