sg777 jili login
sg777 jili login
Nokia Corporation Stock Exchange Release 3 December 2024 at 22:30 EET Nokia Corporation: Repurchase of own shares on 03.12.2024 Espoo, Finland - On 3 December 2024 Nokia Corporation (LEI: 549300A0JPRWG1KI7U06) has acquired its own shares (ISIN FI0009000681) as follows: On 22 November 2024, Nokia announced that its Board of Directors is initiating a share buyback program to offset the dilutive effect of new Nokia shares issued to the shareholders of Infinera Corporation and certain Infinera Corporation share-based incentives. The repurchases in compliance with the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) 596/2014 (MAR), the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1052 and under the authorization granted by Nokia's Annual General Meeting on 3 April 2024 started on 25 November 2024 and end by 31 December 2025 and target to repurchase 150 million shares for a maximum aggregate purchase price of EUR 900 million. Total cost of transactions executed on 3 December 2024 was 3,497,006. After the disclosed transactions, Nokia Corporation holds 365,807,161 treasury shares. Details of transactions are included as an appendix to this announcement. On behalf of Nokia Corporation BofA Securities Europe SA About Nokia At Nokia, we create technology that helps the world act together. As a B2B technology innovation leader, we are pioneering networks that sense, think and act by leveraging our work across mobile, fixed and cloud networks. In addition, we create value with intellectual property and long-term research, led by the award-winning Nokia Bell Labs. With truly open architectures that seamlessly integrate into any ecosystem, our high-performance networks create new opportunities for monetization and scale. Service providers, enterprises and partners worldwide trust Nokia to deliver secure, reliable and sustainable networks today - and work with us to create the digital services and applications of the future. Inquiries: Nokia Communications Phone: +358 10 448 4900 Email: [email protected] Maria Vaismaa, Global Head of External Communications Nokia Investor Relations Phone: +358 40 803 4080 Email: [email protected] Attachment Daily Report 2024-12-03Dillon Gabriel's run at Oregon harkens back to the days of another Hawaii-born QB, Marcus MariotaBREAKING NEWS: Israel, Hezbollah come to terms to pause fighting
A Chinatown resident took the City of Vancouver and the Vancouver Police Department to court over a surveillance truck parked near her apartment. Karina Papenbrock-Ryan alleged the VPD violated her privacy and charter rights when it left its surveillance trailer on East Pender Street four years ago. The force calls the machine its . It consists of cameras and other equipment mounted on wheels. Police placed it outside the Chinese Cultural Centre in April 2020 in response to racist graffiti referencing COVID-19, the holocaust, and threatening violence against Asian people. The trailer was about one and a half blocks from Papenbrock-Ryan’s condominium. She estimated she walked through its field of view about 10 times without knowing what it was. When she saw a social media post explaining that it had cameras, she decided to modify her route so she wouldn’t walk past it anymore. “Ms. Papenbrock-Ryan describes this action as a test case dealing with the rights of the public to be free from mass surveillance by means of video cameras deployed in a public place or, put differently, general video surveillance without a specific investigative purpose,” judge Bruce Elwood wrote in his . Elwood dismissed Papenbrock-Elwood’s action but thanked her for bringing it forward. The case focused on whether her privacy was breached. Elwood explained there are already laws governing continually recorded police surveillance of public spaces, facial recognition technology, collection of personal information by the VPD, targeted surveillance during a criminal investigation, and the admissibility of video evidence during a criminal trial. The surveillance trailer records its video locally on a hard drive that’s wiped clean every four days unless an officer tries to access it. Though the judge accepted that Papenbrock-Elwood would have walked through its field of view, there’s nothing to suggest that a VPD officer accessed, reviewed, or distributed any images of her. Given the totality of circumstances, the judge didn’t think her privacy was violated. “At most, the footage of Ms. Papenbrock-Ryan would have disclosed her gender, her general appearance, her direction of travel, her mode of travel, and the date and time when she passed by,” the judge wrote. “It would not have revealed where she lives, where she works, where she was going, her religious or political beliefs, with whom she associates or any other biographical information about her.” Pepenbrock-Elwood’s privacy concerns also had to be balanced against community concerns following the hateful graffiti. “Provided it was working at the time, the [trailer] may have recorded a criminal act in progress, an image of a suspect, their direction and mode of travel, etc.” the judge wrote. “However, its primary purposes were to serve as a physical and psychological deterrent, and to reassure the community.” The judge looked at screenshots from the trailer and estimated its field of view at about 40 square metres. Its cameras were aimed at the Chinese Cultural Centre. The surveillance trailer ended up being removed in June 2020. It suffered technical difficulties that led to it not recording for several days. During that time, the trailer itself was tagged with graffiti.Walton gets Tk 350cr orders at ATS Expo2 no-brainer ASX oil shares to buy with $1,500 right now
A retired police officer in the nation’s capital was convicted Monday of lying to authorities about leaking confidential information to the leader of the Proud Boys extremist group. US District Judge Amy Berman Jackson convicted former Metropolitan Police Department Lt. Shane Lamond of obstructing justice and making false statements after a trial without a jury. Sentencing was scheduled for April 3 after Lamond’s conviction on all four counts. Lamond was charged with leaking information to then-Proud Boys national chairman Enrique Tarrio , who was under investigation in the burning of a Black Lives Matter banner . Lamond testified at his bench trial that he never provided Tarrio with sensitive police information. Tarrio, who testified as a witness for Lamond’s defense, said he did not confess to Lamond about burning the banner and did not receive any confidential information from him. But the judge did not find either man’s testimony to be credible. Jackson said the evidence indicated that Lamond was not using Tarrio as a source after the banner burning. “It was the other way around,” she said. The judge said the string of messages that Lamond and Tarrio exchanged over the course of months showed a pattern: “Lamond and Tarrio talk, and Tarrio immediately disseminates what he learns,” she added. The judge described Tarrio as an “awful witness” who was “flippant, grandiose and obnoxious” on the stand. “He was one of the worst I’ve had the opportunity to sit next to during my tenure on the bench,” Jackson said. After the verdict, defense attorney Mark Schamel said it was premature to say if there will be an appeal. “It’s unbelievably disappointing to see every single thing that Lt. Lamond did viewed through a lens to make it appear to be something other than it was,” Schamel said outside the courtroom. “There is nothing disloyal about him at all, and it’s a sad day for him.” Tarrio eventually pleaded guilty to burning the banner stolen from a historic Black church in downtown Washington in December 2020. He was later sentenced to 22 years in prison for his role in the January 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol, part of what prosecutors called a plot to use force to keep Donald Trump in the White House after the 2020 election. Lamond, who met Tarrio in 2019, had supervised the intelligence branch of the police department’s Homeland Security Bureau. He was responsible for monitoring groups like the Proud Boys when they came to Washington. Tarrio was arrested in Washington two days before the January 6 siege. The Miami resident wasn’t at the Capitol when a mob of Trump supporters stormed the building and interrupted the congressional certification of President Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory. Prosecutors said the trial evidence proved Lamond tipped off Tarrio that a warrant for his arrest had been signed. “Similarly, the defendant affirmatively advised Mr. Tarrio in a written message that he was being asked to identify him for a warrant, a warning obviously in contemplation of the subsequent prosecution and with obvious ramifications for it,” prosecutors wrote . Lamond’s indictment says he and Tarrio exchanged messages about the January 6 riot and discussed whether Proud Boys members were in danger of being charged in the attack. “Of course I can’t say it officially, but personally I support you all and don’t want to see your group’s name and reputation dragged through the mud,” Lamond wrote. Lamond said he was upset that a prosecutor labeled him as a Proud Boys “sympathizer” who acted as a “double agent” for the group after Tarrio burned a stolen Black Lives Matter banner in December 2020. “I don’t support the Proud Boys, and I’m not a Proud Boys sympathizer,” Lamond testified. Lamond said he considered Tarrio to be a source, not a friend. But he said he tried to build a friendly rapport with the group leader to gain his trust. Justice Department prosecutor Joshua Rothstein pointed to messages that suggest Lamond provided Tarrio with “real-time updates” on the police investigation of the December 12, 2020, banner burning. Lamond, 48, of Colonial Beach, Virginia, was charged with one count of obstruction of justice and three counts of making false statements. He retired in May 2023 after 23 years of service to the police department.
Give the Gift of Movies at Regal this Holiday Season
S&P/TSX composite index rises Tuesday, U.S. markets mixed
New Delhi, Dec 26 (PTI) Left parties on Thursday night condoled the death of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, calling him a leader with strong commitment to secularism. “We express our sorrow at the death of Former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh. He was a leader with a strong commitment to secularism, democracy and the pluralist ethos of India,” Communist Party of India (Marxist) said in a post on X. “We express our deep condolences to his wife Smt. Gursharan Kaur, his daughters and family,” the Left party said. Meanwhile, Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya recalled the former prime minister’s remarks that “history would be kinder” to him. “He was grilled for scams that would never be proved, for his reticence that’d be held against him as a sign of weakness. But today India will perhaps agree to his 2014 remark: ‘history will be kinder to me than the contemporary media’,” Bhattacharya said in a post on X. Singh, the architect of India’s economic reforms and a consensus builder in the rough world of politics, died here on Thursday night. He was 92. His death was announced by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, where he was admitted in the Emergency ward around 8.30 PM in a critical condition. Months before he demitted office as prime minister in 2014, Singh had famously asserted that his leadership was not weak and history would be kinder to him than what the media projected at that time. Addressing a press conference here in January 2014, in what was one of his last media interactions, Singh had said, “I do not believe that I have been a weak Prime Minister ... I honestly believe that history will be kinder to me than the contemporary media or for that matter the Opposition in Parliament... Given the political compulsions, I have done the best I could do.” PTI AO SCY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. var ytflag = 0;var myListener = function() {document.removeEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);lazyloadmyframes();};document.addEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {if (ytflag == 0) {lazyloadmyframes();ytflag = 1;}});function lazyloadmyframes() {var ytv = document.getElementsByClassName("klazyiframe");for (var i = 0; i < ytv.length; i++) {ytv[i].src = ytv[i].getAttribute('data-src');}} Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );France on Monday observed a day of mourning for the victims in the cyclone-hit Indian Ocean archipelago of Mayotte as the clock ticked for President Emmanuel Macron to appoint the fourth government in a year marked by political crisis. The widely-expected announcement of the government of new prime minister Francois Bayrou was postponed on Sunday, with the Elysee saying the new cabinet would not be named before 1700 GMT Monday, worsening uncertainty in the second largest EU economy. Macron and his wife Brigitte observed a moment of silence in the courtyard of the Elysee Palace for the victims in Mayotte, France’s poorest overseas territory where at least 35 people were killed and 2,500 injured. Authorities have warned the death toll could soar. Prime Minister Bayrou said the silence “conveys a collective mourning, a sense of solidarity with all those who are suffering, and a commitment that the national community will be there to rebuild Mayotte.” The 73-year-old centrist was appointed on December 13 after the fall of a short-lived conservative-led government. Bayrou had said he hoped that his new administration would be presented “over the weekend” and “in any case before Christmas”. Macron and Bayrou held a series of talks Sunday but contrary to expectations the composition of a new administration was not announced.
BJP for robust system to push saffron agenda, counter oppn in UP
NEW DELHI: Canada has officially denied it has any evidence to link PM Modi, foreign minister S Jaishankar and NSA Ajit Doval with the murder of pro-Khalistan terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, distancing itself from a Canadian media report earlier this week that quoted an anonymous security official to suggest that all three shared culpability for the crime. New Delhi had described the Globe and Mail report as ludicrous, while warning Ottawa that such "smear campaigns" will further damage the already strained ties. "On Oct 14th, because of a significant and ongoing threat to public safety, the RCMP and officials took the extraordinary step of making public accusations of serious criminal activity in Canada perpetrated by agents of the govt of India," Canadian NSA Nathalie Drouin said in an official statement. "The govt of Canada has not stated, nor is it aware of, evidence linking PM Modi, minister Jaishankar, or NSA Doval to the serious criminal activity within Canada. Any suggestion to the contrary is both speculative and inaccurate," the official said. Canada had last month accused Union home minister Amit Shah of masterminding attacks on Sikh separatists and Canadians in the country. New Delhi had described the allegation as absurd and warned Ottawa that "unfounded insinuations" will have serious consequences for bilateral ties. RCMP had alleged involvement of Indian high commissioner and other diplomats in criminal activities, leading to their expulsion. India, however, maintains that it recalled the officials. "While Canada does not have direct evidence that Mr Modi knew, the official said the assessment is that it would be unthinkable that three senior political figures in India would not have discussed the targeted killings with Mr Modi before proceeding," Globe and Mail report said.New Delhi, Dec 26 (PTI) Left parties on Thursday night condoled the death of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, calling him a leader with strong commitment to secularism. “We express our sorrow at the death of Former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh. He was a leader with a strong commitment to secularism, democracy and the pluralist ethos of India,” Communist Party of India (Marxist) said in a post on X. “We express our deep condolences to his wife Smt. Gursharan Kaur, his daughters and family,” the Left party said. Meanwhile, Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya recalled the former prime minister’s remarks that “history would be kinder” to him. “He was grilled for scams that would never be proved, for his reticence that’d be held against him as a sign of weakness. But today India will perhaps agree to his 2014 remark: ‘history will be kinder to me than the contemporary media’,” Bhattacharya said in a post on X. Singh, the architect of India’s economic reforms and a consensus builder in the rough world of politics, died here on Thursday night. He was 92. His death was announced by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, where he was admitted in the Emergency ward around 8.30 PM in a critical condition. Months before he demitted office as prime minister in 2014, Singh had famously asserted that his leadership was not weak and history would be kinder to him than what the media projected at that time. Addressing a press conference here in January 2014, in what was one of his last media interactions, Singh had said, “I do not believe that I have been a weak Prime Minister ... I honestly believe that history will be kinder to me than the contemporary media or for that matter the Opposition in Parliament... Given the political compulsions, I have done the best I could do.” PTI AO SCY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. var ytflag = 0;var myListener = function() {document.removeEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);lazyloadmyframes();};document.addEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {if (ytflag == 0) {lazyloadmyframes();ytflag = 1;}});function lazyloadmyframes() {var ytv = document.getElementsByClassName("klazyiframe");for (var i = 0; i < ytv.length; i++) {ytv[i].src = ytv[i].getAttribute('data-src');}} Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );
Regional, racial, and economic disparities in cancer risk from air pollution exposure persist, but improving, new research suggests December 3, 2024 Desert Research Institute A nationwide U.S. assessment of estimated cancer risk from airborne toxics shows that risk is concentrated in urban communities, those with lower incomes, and those with higher proportions of racial minorities. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email New research builds on scientific understanding of how air pollution and cancer risk are distributed throughout the U.S. Air pollution, often resulting from industrial or vehicle emissions, can travel for hundreds of miles and impact the health of communities through higher rates of asthma, respiratory infections, stroke, and lung cancer. Although previous studies have identified disparities in how public health risks vary by income and race, a new study takes a detailed look across U.S. census tracts to find patterns in who is most at risk from cancer resulting from lifetime exposure to air pollution and how this risk is changing through time. Researchers from Desert Research Institute (DRI) and the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR) teamed up for the new study, published October in Environmental Science & Technology . Using sociodemographic data from the U.S. Census Bureau and public health and air pollution information from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) between 2011 and 2019, the study identified higher estimated cancer risk tied to air toxics in urban communities, those with lower incomes, and those with higher proportions of racial minorities. "I wanted to look holistically at poor health outcomes from air pollution exposure throughout the country and through time to see if things are getting better or worse, and what the main socioeconomic drivers are for where the pollution is being distributed," says Patrick Hurbain, postdoctoral researcher and environmental epidemiologist at DRI who led the study. Although previous studies have identified public health disparities related to specific air pollutants, this is one of the first to look at air pollution loads as a whole and changes over time. Public and environmental health data came from the EPA's Air Toxics Screening Assessment. This publicly available tool ( https://www.epa.gov/AirToxScreen/airtoxscreen-mapping-tool ) maps concentrations of hundreds of toxic air pollutants from all sources, as well as cancer risk estimates tied to lifetime exposure across U.S. census tracts. Census tracts with the highest estimated cancer risk were found in urban communities, with racial demographics showing stronger correlations with disparities than either income or education level. Communities with the highest levels of estimated cancer risk, like "Cancer Alley" in southern Louisiana, have significantly more Black and Hispanic community members compared to White individuals. This racial disparity was not consistent in rural and suburban communities, where larger White populations showed higher burdens of cancer risk. "There is a definite effect of the social makeup of an area with respect to their estimated risk from air pollution," Hurbain says. The study found that racial disparities peaked in 2011, with the magnitude of the disparity improving in later years. "That means that air pollution control measures are doing better, and people are, in fact, getting less air toxics across the country, which is exciting," Hurbain says. Disparities for lower income communities, however, were found to be consistent through time. Hurbain hopes to expand on the research by focusing on the most impacted communities and taking a closer look at factors like the age of housing, poverty levels, and surrounding industries to identify ways to improve public health. With publicly available data like the map used for this study, Hurbain hopes that more people will get involved in examining the risks in their own communities. "Everyone can be a citizen scientist and start looking at the state of our environment," he says. Story Source: Materials provided by Desert Research Institute . Note: Content may be edited for style and length. Journal Reference : Cite This Page :Spain’s leftist government said Friday it has fined five budget airlines including Ryanair and EasyJet 179 million euros ($187 million) for “abusive practices” such as charging passengers for hand luggage. The carriers, which included Spanish airlines Volotea and Vueling along with Norwegian Air, were also fined for charging passengers to reserve adjacent seats for children and other dependents and not accepting cash when selling tickets at airports, the consumer rights ministry said. Irish no-frills carrier Ryanair, which was the first to start charging extra for hand luggage in November 2018, was slapped with the biggest fine of 107.8 million euros. Vueling — part of the International Airlines Group which also owns British Airways — was ordered to pay 39.3 million euros. EasyJet was fined 29.1 million euros, Norwegian Air 1.6 million euros and Barcelona-based Volotea 1.2 million euros. The fines are also for providing misleading information and lack of price transparency “which hinders consumers’ ability to compare offers” and make informed decisions, the ministry said. Ryanair was specifically fined for charging passengers a “disproportionate amount” for printing their boarding passes at terminals when they did not have them. The airline announced it would immediately appeal. Its boss Michael O’Leary slammed the fines as “illegal and baseless” and said the consumer affairs ministry imposed them “for political reasons”. EU courts have defended carriers’ freedom to set prices and policies without government interference, and the fines “would destroy the ability of low-cost airlines to pass on cost savings to consumers via lower fares”, O’Leary added in a statement. Spanish air sector association ALA said the “absurd” decision put the airlines at a competitive disadvantage and confirmed they would appeal. The baggage rules would remain unchanged until the courts decide, ALA added. The International Air Transport Association also condemned what it called an “appalling decision” that was “a slap in the face of travellers who want choice”. Consumer rights association Facua, which has campaigned against the fees, hailed the decision as “historic”. “These sanctions are the highest ever applied by a consumer protection authority,” it added in a statement, saying passengers could now claim reimbursement of these charges. The different fines were calculated based on the “illicit profit” obtained by each airline from these practices. The ministry said it had upheld fines that were first announced in May and dismissed the appeals previously lodged by companies. With 2,400 staff representing 100 different nationalities, AFP covers the world as a leading global news agency. AFP provides fast, comprehensive and verified coverage of the issues affecting our daily lives.
