super k drugstore
super k drugstore

Philadelphia Eagles wide receiver DeVonta Smith missed practice for the second straight day because of a hamstring injury. The latest update indicates there's a possibility that Smith could miss the Eagles' Week 12 matchup against the Los Angeles Rams. For a second straight day, Eagles WR DeVonta Smith did not practice today due to a hamstring injury. pic.twitter.com/P2SaEEuW8D More News: 49ers' Brock Purdy Exits Practice Early Due to Significant Injury Smith, 26, was spotted limping back to the locker room after Thursday night's win. Since then, Smith has been trending to miss this upcoming week but nothing has been confirmed. Smith has missed just two games throughout his NFL career, one being earlier this season due to a concussion. If Smith were to miss Sunday's game, it would mark the first time in his four-year career that he would miss more than one game in a single season. Smith's near-perfect attendance is a testament to his durability. The hamstring injury Smith is dealing with has plagued the wide receiver for several weeks now. A.J. Brown also missed time this season due to a hamstring injury. Smith took much of the receiving load in Brown's absence as he was sidelined for three games. The Eagles could choose to keep Smith out as the team prepares for a deep playoff run. Smith has 41 catches for 516 yards and four touchdowns this season. As of late, Smith has tallied just six receptions and 43 yards on nine targets through the last two games. Smith's lack of production seems to be because of a weird combination of factors. Plays are certainly dialed up for the wide receiver but haven't been successful. Smith isn't the only offensive starter to be dealing with an injury heading into Week 12. Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts has also been nursing an ankle injury but was listed as a full participant in practice Thursday which is a sign he will be ready to go for Sunday's game against the Rams. "At this point of the year, I think it's not about, I think it's necessarily about me, I think it's the mentality where we are," Hurts told NBC Sports . "We're in a phase of the year where things could very easily (go bad). Well, it did (last year), it didn't end the way we wanted to. And so that's at the top of my (list) as we enter this phase and putting the emphasis on finishing strong, putting ourself in a good place." The Eagles hope to escape their playoff woes in 2024 but will need both Smith and Hurts to remain healthy in order to do so. For more on the NFL , head to Newsweek Sports .
Doctor Becomes First to Offer Innovative Glaucoma Treatment in Harford County
The Philadelphia Phillies had a rather disappointing postseason after setting high expectations in the regular season. The team could look to make a splash in free agency in hopes of getting to the World Series in 2025. While making offseason predictions, theScore predicted that the Phillies would sign San Francisco Giants ace Blake Snell in free agency. "The Phillies haven't been afraid to spend in recent years, and they'll do it again this winter by luring two-time Cy Young winner Blake Snell to Philadelphia," wrote theScore staff. "Adding Snell allows the reigning NL East champions to run out a top-tier starter every night." Spotrac projects Snell to sign a five-year, $131 million deal in free agency. He was an All-Star in 2018 and is a two-time Cy Young Award Winner. Last season he had a 3.12 ERA after signing late in the offseason and getting off to a shaky start. However, in 12 games after the All-Star Break, he had a 1.45 ERA and 103 strikeouts. He showed that he is still a true ace and one of the best pitchers in Major League Baseball. The Phillies already have Zack Wheeler, Aaron Nola, Cristopher Sánchez and Ranger Suárez in the rotation for next season. Adding Snell would give them the best rotation in baseball. The Phillies have not been shy of handing out big contracts. Snell is the type of player who can get the Phillies over the top and back in the Fall Classic. More MLB: Phillies could dump Alec Bohm and sign $119 million All-Star to replace him
New Delhi, Nov 22 (PTI) Markets regulator Sebi on Friday proposed diversifying and widening the ownership of the clearing corporations, which are at present wholly-owned subsidiaries of stock exchanges. Sebi rules prohibit clearing corporations (CCs) from listing publicly but allow stock exchanges (their parent entities) to list, indirectly exposing CCs to market pressures. "While looking to broad base and diversify the ownership of CCs, it is important to ensure that such a transition is fair to all stakeholders (including to the current shareholders of the parent exchange) and causes minimal disruption to the capital markets ecosystem," Sebi said in its consultation paper. Considering this, one approach could be a pro-rata distribution of 49 per cent of shareholding of a CC to the existing shareholders of the parent exchange and the balance 51 per cent of shareholding would remain with the parent exchange to start with. The parent exchange could then be given 5 years to bring down this holding to 15 per cent or lower, by selling down their stake to other exchanges. This approach would mean that CCs would remain majority-owned by exchanges in line with the SECC norms. "Alternatively, the entire shareholding of a CC could be allotted to the existing shareholders of exchanges, who would then be free to trade their shares in the CC. This would allow for a clean break of the CC from its parent exchange, in a manner that is fair to the existing shareholders of the parent exchange," Sebi has proposed. Further, it has been suggested that CCs will continue to be prohibited from listing. Jyoti Prakash Gadia - Managing Director at Resurgent India, a Sebi-registered merchant bank, said the discussion paper correctly highlights the fact that with the widening and steep growth of the capital markets, the role of clearing corporations should be to function independently without any conflict of interest or bias in favour of the parent stock exchange. Two divergent propositions have been proposed to spread and widen the shareholding of the CCs. Additionally, the regulator has suggested CCs should operate as profit-making public utilities, reinvesting in technology, infrastructure, and risk management. Besides, fee structures should remain reasonable without increasing costs for investors. The regulator has suggested encouraging multi-asset CCs while maintaining multiple CCs to reduce reliance on a single entity and enhance systemic resilience. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has sought public comments on these proposals by December 13. (This story has not been edited by THE WEEK and is auto-generated from PTI)Hydrogen Car Market SWOT Analysis by Big Giants: Toyota, Hyundai, Honda
No. 21 Creighton's Steven Ashworth doubtful for Players Era Festival opener against AztecsArclin unveils striking new brand that stands out in the material science industry with exacting precision and a bold new lookEDISON, N.J. - Repair crews are working on a massive water main break that left some 20,000 Edison residents with little or no water pressure. The break in the 20-inch water main created temporary pond on the streets of Edison at around midnight. It happened just off Woodbridge Avenue, next to Ben Franklin Elementary School. Fortunately, schools are closed this week. Crews started working on the break at around 1 a.m. "Businesses and residents along Route 1, Woodbridge Avenue, Route 27 are all impacted. Our crews are working pretty hard. Actually, they're working very hard. They've been at this for hours, trying to first isolate the break itself, and then they are going to begin repairs," Mayor Sam Joshi said. Joshi called it a "very large water main break," and said aging infrastructure is part of the issue. Some of the pipes in Edison date back 80 years, he said. Joshi said officials hope to get water service restored by Thursday night. Nick Caloway is a multi-skilled journalist who was thrilled to join the CBS News New York news team in August 2019. Since then, Nick has covered crime, politics, the pandemic and more across the Tri-State Area.
Rays will play 13 of first 16 games at home and 47 of 59, then have 69 of last 103 on roadNot for the first time this season, Liverpool delivered under pressure to tighten their grip on the top of the table. Trailing 1-0 after a generally anaemic first-half performance, two fine goals either side of the interval from Cody Gakpo and Curtis Jones turned the game around before Mohamed Salah capped the win and allowed Arne Slot’s side to move seven points clear. We dissect the major talking points at Anfield. How did Liverpool step it up? Arne Slot has proved adept at triggering second-half improvements from his Liverpool team this season and here was another one for the Dutchman’s growing collection. Liverpool’s decision making before the break was abject. The hosts had 73 per cent possession in the first half but forced just a single save from rookie keeper Jakub Stolarczyk prior to Gakpo’s equaliser. So many sloppy errors, so often the wrong option was taken. Slot cut an agitated figure on the touchline but the interval gave him the opportunity to make the required tactical tweaks and a change of approach quickly reaped its rewards. Liverpool’s second goal epitomised the greater composure and better movement on display as they carved Leicester open rather than whipping high balls in from wide areas. Jones found Salah, who played in Alexis Mac Allister down the right. His low centre was turned home by Jones, who marked his 100th Premier League appearance in style. Advertisement ‘Patience’ is a word Slot repeatedly uses to his players and they showed a lot more of it in the second half as they waited for openings to emerge rather than trying to force the issue. Gakpo saw one effort ruled out due to Darwin Nunez being offside in the build up before the points were finally secured by Salah’s cool finish — his 19th goal of the season — with eight minutes to go. The introduction of Diogo Jota and Dominik Szoboszlai off the bench also helped Liverpool get the job done. The bench looks so strong. As the Kop chanted about being top of the table and serenaded Slot late on, it was a serene end to a night which had got off to the worst possible start. James Pearce Another timely Gakpo intervention When Gakpo scores, it tends to mean something. Liverpool were toiling to find an equaliser and Anfield was growing frustrated but Gakpo took matters into his own hands and produced a terrific curling effort to put his team level. UK readers watch here: Cody Gakpo, that is BEAUTIFUL! 🤤💫 #PLonPrime #LIVLEI pic.twitter.com/jr29PQVwiR — Amazon Prime Video Sport (@primevideosport) December 26, 2024 U.S. readers watch here: Cody Gakpo scores an absolute BELTER from outside the box! 🎯 📺 USA Network | #LIVLEI pic.twitter.com/mLJVfF3DhE — NBC Sports Soccer (@NBCSportsSoccer) December 26, 2024 It was the moment that changed the momentum of the game and set Liverpool on their way to a comeback victory, and not for the first time where Gakpo is concerned. Of his 26 goals he has scored for Liverpool in his first 18 months in English football, 14 have changed the game state. This was the sixth time he has found an equaliser but he has scored another seven times to put his team ahead. His goal against Leicester was a repeat of last season’s meeting at Anfield in the third round of the Carabao Cup (which they went onto win) when they also found themselves 1-0 down in the first half. His goal inspired them to a 3-1 win that day. Advertisement Manchester City , Brighton , Fulham (all twice), Wolves , Bournemouth , Luton and Aston Villa have all been on the receiving end of significant Gakpo goals, and that’s without even mentioning the strikes that put Liverpool 2-0 up against Real Madrid and Bayer Leverkusen in the Champions League . His impact when his team needs him is clear. Playing off the left flank under Arne Slot, Gakpo has been able to find more consistency than he did last season under Jurgen Klopp who opted to rotate him across the entire front line. As with fellow Dutch international Ryan Gravenberch , Slot is getting a tune out of his countryman when he needs it. Jordan Campbell GO DEEPER Liverpool DealSheet: Why January transfers are unlikely and who could go on loan? What happened to Liverpool’s crossing? At half-time Liverpool had attempted 33 crosses. Not only was it 19 more than in any of their opening 17 Premier League first-half showings this season, it was more than the total recorded in any of those full matches. They had spurned opportunities early in the game but after Leicester took the lead they became reliant on crosses from deep that allowed Ruud van Nistelrooy’s side to camp in their box and head them away. There was a clear change of strategy after Slot had the interval to fine-tune his team’s approach. They only attempted another 11 before the final whistle. The total of 44 was still 13 ahead of the next highest match total against Fulham (31), but the reduction in the number of crosses helped Liverpool play with more precision and variety. It was a half characterised by undercooked crosses and corners. They took 12 across the full game, delivering nine into the box in total — of which only one successfully found a Liverpool player. When even the right foot of Trent Alexander-Arnold does not beat the man at the front post in three successive deliveries, it is bound to be a struggle. Advertisement Slot has shown his ability to change games from the bench but this time he showed tactical acumen to help his players resist the trap of desperately firing hopeful deliveries into the penalty area. Jordan Campbell What next for Liverpool? Sunday, December 29 : West Ham United (away), Premier League , 5:15pm UK, 12:15pm ET Recommended reading (Top photo: Paul Ellis/AFP via Getty Images))
Elizabeth Swann has spoken. Keira Knightley has shared that the “Pirates of the Caribbean” movies, which helped propel her career, were also the reason she was “taken down publicly.” The “Atonement” actress , 39, discussed how the Disney franchise positively and negatively impacted her life during a recent interview with the Times . “It’s a funny thing when you have something that was making and breaking you at the same time,” Knightley said, referring to the “Pirates” movies. “I was seen as s–t because of them, and yet, because they did so well, I was given the opportunity to do the films that I ended up getting Oscar nominations for,” she continued. Knightley has received two Oscar nominations over the course of her career. The British star was nominated for Best Actress in 2005 for her portrayal of Elizabeth Bennet in director Joe Wright’s adaptation of Jane Austen’s “Pride & Prejudice,” and then for Best Supporting Actress in 2014 for playing Joan Clarke in the WWII drama “The Imitation Game” opposite Benedict Cumberbatch. “They were the most successful films I’ll ever be a part of, and they were the reason that I was taken down publicly,” she added. “So they’re a very confused place in my head.” Knightley starred alongside Johnny Depp and Orlando Bloom in the first three “Pirates of the Caribbean” films, which were released in 2003, 2006 and 2007. She was only 18 when the first movie hit theaters. Due to her experience, she has no plans of acting in a film franchise ever again. “The hours are insane. It’s years of your life, you have no control over where you’re filming, how long you’re filming, what you’re filming,” she explained. Being at the center of such mega-hits at such a young age also took a toll on Knightley’s mental health. In 2018, she opened up about suffering a mental breakdown and being diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder when she was 22. “In that classic trauma way I don’t remember it,” she shared. “There’s been a complete delete, and then some things will come up, and I’ll suddenly have a very bodily memory of it because, ultimately, it’s public shaming, isn’t it? It’s obviously part of my psyche, given how young I was when it happened. I’ve been made around it.” Much of the public shaming she faced focused on her weight. She was often accused in the media of battling an eating disorder. “I knew I wasn’t. I knew I was eating,” she explained. “I remember viscerally one of the Olsen twins had anorexia, and she went into a clinic,” Knightley added, referring to Mary-Kate Olsen, who sought treatment at a rehab clinic for an eating disorder in 2004 after the former child star and fashion designer graduated high school. “I remember being asked about it on a press tour, like it was a joke. She was meant to be shamed for seeking help for anorexia,” she continued. “I remember sitting there just being like, ‘Wow, this is wild.’ Can you imagine? ... That made me really emotional. That’s not even about me, it’s about her. I still can’t bear it.” The star believed the media was looking for any opportunity to cast her as a star in distress. “I 100% recognized and saw people’s careers being shattered because they were photographed coming out of clubs,” she recalled. “The money on my head at that point, if you’d got a picture of me drunk, was so huge. I wasn’t going to give the [paparazzi] the satisfaction of taking that away, so I was unbelievably straight.” Far from franchise-land, today Knightley chooses her roles carefully, in part influenced by being a mother of two young girls. “I keep being offered things about children dying or about mothers dying. Can’t do it,” she admitted. “I’ve been really surprised in the past few years about what I’ve said no to. I’ve wanted it to be more pure entertainment and maybe that’s because I’ve needed that.”Google and the US government faced off in a federal court on Monday, as each side delivered closing arguments in a case revolving around the technology giant's alleged unfair domination of online advertising. The trial in a Virginia federal court is Google's second US antitrust case now under way as the US government tries to rein in the power of big tech. In a separate trial, a Washington judge ruled that Google's search business is an illegal monopoly, and the US Justice Department is asking that Google sell its Chrome browser business to resolve the case. The latest case, also brought by the Justice Department, focuses on ad technology for the open web -- the complex system determining which online ads people see when they surf the internet. The vast majority of websites use a trio of Google ad software products that together, leave no way for publishers to escape Google's advertising technology, the plaintiffs allege. Publishers -- including News Corp and Gannett publishing -- complain that they are locked into Google's advertising technology in order to run ads on their websites. "Google is once, twice, three times a monopolist," DOJ lawyer Aaron Teitelbaum told the court in closing arguments. Presiding judge Leonie Brinkema has said that she would deliver her opinion swiftly, as early as next month. Whatever Brinkema's judgment, the outcome will almost certainly be appealed, prolonging a process that could go all the way to the US Supreme Court. The government alleges that Google controls the auction-style system that advertisers use to purchase advertising space online. The US lawyers argue that this approach allows Google to charge higher prices to advertisers while sending less revenue to publishers such as news websites, many of which are struggling to stay in business. The US argues that Google used its financial power to acquire potential rivals and corner the ad tech market, leaving advertisers and publishers with no choice but to use its technology. The government wants Google to divest parts of its ad tech business. Google dismissed the allegations as an attempt by the government to pick "winners and losers" in a diverse market. The company argues that the display ads at issue are just a small share of today's ad tech business. Google says the plaintiffs' definition of the market ignores ads that are also placed in search results, apps and social media platforms and where, taken as a whole, Google does not dominate. "The law simply does not support what the plaintiffs are arguing in this case," said Google's lawyer Karen Dunn. She warned that if Google were to lose the case, the winners would be rival tech giants such as Microsoft, Meta or Amazon, whose market share in online advertising is ascendant as Google's share is falling. The DOJ countered that it simply "does not matter" that Google is competing in the broader market for online ads. "That is a different question" than the market for ads on websites that is the target of the case, said Teitelbaum. Google also points to US legal precedent, saying arguments similar to the government's have been refuted in previous antitrust cases. Dunn also warned that forcing Google to work with rivals in its ad products would amount to government central planning that the court should reject. If the judge finds Google to be at fault, a new phase of the trial would decide how the company should comply with that conclusion. And all that could be moot if the incoming Trump administration decides to drop the case. The president-elect has been a critic of Google's, but he warned earlier this month that breaking it up could be "a very dangerous thing." arp/dw