JERUSALEM — A new round of Israeli airstrikes in Yemen on Thursday targeted the Houthi rebel-held capital and multiple ports, while the World Health Organization's director-general said the bombardment occurred nearby as he prepared to board a flight in Sanaa, with a crew member injured. "The air traffic control tower, the departure lounge — just a few meters from where we were — and the runway were damaged," Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on social media. He added that he and U.N. colleagues were safe. "We will need to wait for the damage to the airport to be repaired before we can leave," he said, without mentioning the source of the bombardment. U.N. spokesperson Stephanie Tremblay later said the injured person was with the U.N. Humanitarian Air Service. Israel's army later told The Associated Press it wasn't aware that the WHO chief or delegation were at the location in Yemen. People are also reading... Smoke rises Thursday from the area around the International Airport after an airstrike in Sanaa, Yemen. Osamah Abdulrahman, Associated Press The Israeli strikes followed several days of Houthi launches setting off sirens in Israel. The Israeli military said in a statement it attacked infrastructure used by the Iran-backed Houthis at the international airport in Sanaa and ports in Hodeida, Al-Salif and Ras Qantib, along with power stations, claiming they were used to smuggle in Iranian weapons and for the entry of senior Iranian officials. Israel's military added it had "capabilities to strike very far from Israel's territory — precisely, powerfully, and repetitively." The strikes, carried out more than 1,000 miles from Jerusalem, came a day after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said "the Houthis, too, will learn what Hamas and Hezbollah and Assad's regime and others learned" as his military has battled those more powerful proxies of Iran. The Houthi-controlled satellite channel al-Masirah reported multiple deaths and showed broken windows, collapsed ceilings and a bloodstained floor and vehicle. Iran's foreign ministry condemned the strikes. The U.S. military also targeted the Houthis in recent days. The U.N. says the targeted ports are important entryways for humanitarian aid for Yemen, the poorest Arab nation that plunged into a civil war in 2014. Over the weekend, 16 people were wounded when a Houthi missile hit a playground in the Israeli city of Tel Aviv, while other missiles and drones were shot down. Last week, Israeli jets struck Sanaa and Hodeida, killing nine people, calling it a response to previous Houthi attacks. The Houthis also have been targeting shipping on the Red Sea corridor, calling it solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza. The U.N. Security Council has an emergency meeting Monday in response to an Israeli request that it condemn the Houthi attacks and Iran for supplying them weapons. Relatives and friends mourn over the bodies of five Palestinian journalists Thursday who were killed by an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City at the Al-Aqsa Hospital in Deir al-Balah. Abdel Kareem Hana, Associated Press Listen now and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS Feed | SoundStack | All Of Our Podcasts Journalists killed in Gaza Meanwhile, an Israeli strike killed five Palestinian journalists outside a hospital in Gaza overnight, the territory's Health Ministry said. The strike hit a car outside Al-Awda Hospital in the built-up Nuseirat refugee camp in central Gaza. The journalists worked for local news outlet Al-Quds Today, a television channel affiliated with the Islamic Jihad militant group. Islamic Jihad is a smaller and more extreme ally of Hamas and took part in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack in southern Israel that ignited the war. Israel's military identified four of the men as combat propagandists and said that intelligence, including a list of Islamic Jihad operatives found by soldiers in Gaza, confirmed that all five were affiliated with the group. Associated Press footage showed the incinerated shell of a van, with press markings visible on the back doors. The Committee to Protect Journalists says more than 130 Palestinian reporters have been killed since the start of the war. Israel hasn't allowed foreign reporters to enter Gaza except on military embeds. Israel banned the pan-Arab Al Jazeera network and accuses six of its Gaza reporters of being militants. The Qatar-based broadcaster denies the allegations and accuses Israel of trying to silence its war coverage, which has focused heavily on civilian casualties from Israeli military operations. Mourners cry Thursday while they take the last look at the body of a relative, one of eight Palestinians killed, during their funeral in the West Bank city of Tulkarem. Matias Delacroix, Associated Press Israeli soldier killed Separately, Israel's military said a 35-year-old reserve soldier was killed during fighting in central Gaza. A total of 389 soldiers have been killed in Gaza since the start of the ground operation. The war began when Hamas-led militants stormed across the border, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting about 250. About 100 hostages are still inside Gaza, at least a third of whom are believed to be dead. Israel's air and ground offensive has killed more than 45,000 Palestinians, according to the Health Ministry. It says more than half the fatalities are women and children, but doesn't say how many of the dead were fighters. The offensive caused widespread destruction and hunger and drove around 90% of the population of 2.3 million from their homes. Hundreds of thousands are packed into squalid camps along the coast, with little protection from the cold, wet winter. Also Thursday, people mourned eight Palestinians killed by Israeli military operations in and around Tulkarem in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry. The Israeli military said it opened fire after militants attacked soldiers, and it was aware of uninvolved civilians who were harmed in the raid. Be the first to knowNone

Business Excellence: Midland Appliance recognized as Large Business of the Year

Mindfulness Meditation Application Market Forecast: Key Growth Drivers, Trends, and Opportunities from 2024 to 2033

Waqf Board bill among 16 listed for Winter Session of Parliament

Wheel of Fortune’s most prized tradition is the bonus round, where each episode’s winner is faced with one last puzzle and a mere 10 seconds to come away with an even bigger bundle of cash (or not). But fans want a word with host Ryan Seacrest about how he’s presenting the prizes after giving a puzzling amount of build-up to a player’s $40,000 win. On Friday, November 22’s episode, Brittany Brock, a kindergarten teacher from Chicago, Illinois, was the player to proceed to the coveted bonus round. By then she had won $17,300 in cash, a trip to Kauai, and selected “Living Thing” as her category. With the savvy additional letters of “DPBI” the two-word puzzle read as, “‘_ _ DDL_’ ‘P_PP_'”. Near-instantly, she correctly solved it as “Cuddly Puppy.” The broadcast cut to Seacrest and an excited Brock, and it was time to reveal how much she won from the prize wedge she picked. Seacrest opened the gold prize card and glanced at the figure. “And...” he told her with a surprised grin (below). After a few seconds he added, “Ready?” Broke clasped her hands over her mouth in anticipation as Seacrest then revealed she won an extra $40,000, the least one can win in the bonus round. “$40,000!” he exclaimed. This brought her to a grand total of $57,381 and she was overjoyed nonetheless, embraced her husband. On Social media, many fans celebrated the big win while left wondering why Seacrest presented the prize with such a prolonged rollout that it seemed like a bigger value and as if the confetti was about to overflow onto the Sony Pictures Studios parking lot. “Ryan acting like it’s $75,000 or $100,000 with the slow way he shows the amount,” one fan wrote when the game show shared the clip to YouTube. Over on the WoF Reddit, a fan dedicated a discussion thread to the moment titling it, “Bonus Reveal... lolz.” They continued, “I like Seacrest, but gotta admit, I’m not a fan of the dramatic 40K reveals lol.” “Agreed...” a second user wrote, arguing that a contestant in the future could be “disappointed” it’s not more. “The Mrs. and I commented on that last night. He presents it like it’s something more than the minimum prize amount! One of these days, the contestant is going to react disappointedly.” A third wrote, “He also contorts his body awkwardly and bounces around to just flip the card open. Then says ‘it was this much’ as if he can’t say the amount. Kind of weird. But the lack of higher amounts lately is noticed. I’m glad it’s been all cash so far. A lot of the cars prior were 30k, which is nice, but they were lowest prize.” “I agree, feels like he’s forcing it,” wrote a fourth. A fifth was even more critical, “I’m sorry I know a lot of people are going to get mad at me but I just don’t like him. There’s something about him, that I just don’t enjoy watching him in anything at all.” Meanwhile , Seacrest, of course, had huge shoes to fill replacing the legendary Pat Sajak alongside the iconic Vanna White after four decades for Season 42. His debut month was the strongest ratings month for WoF in the past three years, and viewers were already treated to a viral moment (via a round of sausage) . That said, there have been some other questionable moments according to fans. In September, Seacrest suffered what fans dubbed his “first blooper” , involving a prolonged reaction to rewarding a bonus round. Fans also called out the host for ruling against another player before the timer was up. There have also been a few on-screen “glitches,” and a minor spelling error in a Thanksgiving puzzle . Many fans also blamed a lack of experience on Seacrest’s mishandling of a contestant’s $1million wedge, which she instantly forfeited. Wheel of Fortune , Weeknights, Check your local listings More Headlines:The sweeping victory of the National People’s Power (NPP) in Sri Lanka’s recent elections marked a resounding call for change, as voters across the nation—from north to south and east to west—rejected corrupt political elitism in favour of a new, principled political culture. The scale of this victory, surpassing all predictions, demonstrated the people’s overwhelming desire for a transformation in governance, as clearly reflected in the election results, particularly the postal votes. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, during his address at the swearing-in of the new Cabinet, emphasised a critical shift: the transition from articulating political slogans in Opposition to the responsibility of implementing them through effective governance. He cautioned that the success of the NPP would now depend on delivering on its promises, as slogans alone would no longer resonate with the public. The formation of the NPP’s maiden Cabinet on 18 November sparked widespread discussion, particularly concerning the absence of a Muslim representative. While many celebrated the Cabinet’s adherence to meritocracy and principles, some expressed dissatisfaction, especially on social media, which had been a key platform for NPP’s success. The criticism appears to stem from two distinct groups: Opportunists: These include individuals, both Muslim and non-Muslim, who opposed the NPP during the elections and now seek to exploit the absence of a Muslim minister to discredit the new Government. Emotionally driven advocates: These are well-meaning individuals, including NPP supporters and non-supporters alike, who view the absence of Muslim representation as a failure to uphold symbolic inclusivity. While opportunistic critiques deserve little attention, the emotionally charged reactions highlight the need for a nuanced discussion. It is essential to recognise the NPP’s track record as a champion of minority rights, even in politically and socially adverse circumstances. The party has consistently prioritised principle-based decision-making over political appeasement, distinguishing itself from traditional political practices. The absence of a Muslim minister in the Cabinet raises a broader question: Should ethnic representation take precedence over governance rooted in principles and the Rule of Law? The NPP’s victory reflects a public mandate to dismantle 76 years of political traditions, including symbolic representation, and replace them with a governance framework that ensures fairness, accountability, and the Rule of Law. It is worth asking whether past inclusion of Muslim ministers resulted in tangible benefits for the community, especially during periods of politically motivated violence and systemic discrimination. Sri Lanka’s most urgent need is not symbolic appointments but a governance system that guarantees equal rights, justice, and security for all citizens. The NPP has committed to: Forming a scientifically structured cabinet with portfolios assigned based on qualifications and expertise. Upholding the rule of law, where legislative processes are transparent and inclusive, ensuring that minority rights are protected. While symbolic representation is valuable, it should not overshadow the importance of creating a society where all communities can thrive under a just and accountable government. The NPP/JVP’s steadfast commitment to its principles sets it apart, making any accusations of racism or chauvinism baseless, even by its most ardent detractors. Here are two notable examples that underscore the party’s unwavering stance against racism, even at significant political risk: Easter Sunday aftermath: Following the tragic Easter Sunday terror attacks carried out by extremist individuals identifying as Muslims, a climate of fear and hostility enveloped the Muslim community. Many Muslim leaders and ministers failed to defend their community’s fundamental rights. Amid such turmoil, some Muslims were even compelled to burn their holy Qur’an out of fear of reprisal. In this difficult period, it was none other than His Excellency Anura Kumara Dissanayake (AKD) of the NPP/JVP who courageously stood up for the rights of Muslims, defending them without hesitation. Dr. Shafi allegations: When Dr. Shafi, a Muslim doctor, was wrongfully accused amid a broader campaign of baseless allegations against the Muslim community, a wave of political opportunists, and racist media outlets united to propagate these myths. Yet, only the NPP/JVP and HE AKD openly defended Dr. Shafi and the community, even when Muslim ministers remained silent. Unlike the opportunism rife in traditional Sri Lankan politics, the NPP/JVP adheres to a value-based approach. This principled stance is in stark contrast to the common perception that political alliances and compromises are essential for survival in Sri Lankan politics. The party’s actions during the Presidential election exemplify this ethos. Despite potential political disadvantages, the NPP/JVP refrained from forming opportunistic alliances, maintaining its independence and commitment to its ideals. Traditional parties in Sri Lanka have long indulged in appeasement politics, creating superfluous ministerial positions—such as those for coconut or kithul—to satisfy political allies, often at the expense of taxpayers. In stark contrast, the NPP/JVP has always prioritised merit and accountability over political convenience. Merit-based appointments: The NPP/JVP’s maiden cabinet consists of only 21 members, each selected based on professional qualifications and longstanding dedication to party principles. This streamlined approach ensures efficiency and accountability in governance. A focus beyond personal gain: NPP/JVP leaders do not seek positions for personal advancement. For instance, Tilvin Silva has served as the party’s General Secretary since 1995 without holding a Government position. Similarly, even members who secured the highest preferential votes, such as Namal Karunarathne (Kurunegala) and Nalin Hewage (Galle), were not appointed to cabinet roles but given deputy ministries, reflecting the party’s commitment to principle over patronage. The uproar over the absence of a Muslim representative in the maiden Cabinet of the NPP raises critical questions about the role of minority representation in governance and the larger priorities of the nation. While the emotional responses of many Sri Lankans, especially Muslims, are understandable, it is essential to analyse this issue through a rational lens, grounded in facts, history, and the present context. For the first time since independence, Sri Lanka’s Cabinet does not include a Muslim minister. Historically, every Government has accommodated at least one Muslim representative in the cabinet. However, this tradition alone is not a justification for its continuity. The NPP came to power with a clear mandate to break away from the entrenched practices of the last 76 years, which have often been associated with corruption, inefficiency, and symbolic gestures devoid of tangible benefits. The question many intellectuals now pose is whether this tradition of symbolic inclusion has ever translated into meaningful gains for the Muslim community. Muslim ministers have been present during events such as the violence in Dhargatown, Digana, and Minuwangoda, as well as during campaigns like “Wanda Kottu”, “Wanda Underwear”, and the persecution of Dr. Shafi. Their presence did little to prevent the politically motivated cremation of Muslim bodies during the pandemic. This history forces us to question whether representation alone, without action, serves the interests of the community or the nation. The fear that the absence of a Muslim minister could lead to the enactment of laws detrimental to the community is unfounded when one examines the legislative process. Sri Lanka’s legal system provides multiple layers of scrutiny before a bill becomes law: Cabinet review: Proposals are prepared by ministry officials, discussed, and approved by the cabinet. Public scrutiny: Once gazetted, the public can examine and challenge any bill in the Supreme Court if it violates constitutional or fundamental rights. Parliamentary debate: Parliamentarians from all backgrounds scrutinise and vote on the bill before it becomes law. The absence of a Muslim minister in the cabinet does not negate the checks and balances inherent in this process. Moreover, the presence of Muslim MPs in Parliament ensures that community concerns are voiced effectively. The argument that appointing a Muslim minister symbolises inclusivity and diversity is valid. A government that visibly represents all its people fosters a sense of belonging and national unity. However, symbolism must be balanced against the country’s immediate priorities. While inclusivity is desirable, the current socio-political climate demands a focus on ensuring rule of law, eradicating corruption, and establishing good governance. These principles, when implemented effectively, will benefit all communities, including minorities, far more than symbolic representation. The pressing need of the hour is not merely symbolic gestures but substantive governance. The NPP’s mandate is clear: Rule of Law: Ensuring justice, fairness, and equality for all citizens, irrespective of ethnicity or religion. Merit-based appointments: Selecting leaders and officials based on competence and commitment to public service, not tokenism or appeasement. Eradication of corruption and lawlessness and ensuring good governance: This is essential for fostering trust in institutions, promoting equitable development, and creating a stable, just society where all citizens can thrive. I am of the view that the absence of a Muslim minister in the NPP Cabinet is not an oversight but a reflection of the party’s principle-based governance model. It challenges the traditional approach of token minority representation and prioritises structural reforms to address systemic issues. Inclusivity and diversity remain important, but they must be achieved through actions that foster genuine unity and equity rather than symbolic appointments. The ultimate goal should be a Sri Lanka where all communities feel represented and protected under a governance system driven by principles, not traditions. Let us refrain from hastily judging the Government based on the absence of a Muslim minister in the NPP Cabinet—a decision that, while symbolic of inclusivity, has had little tangible impact on effectiveness. It is imperative for intellectuals and opinion leaders within the Muslim community to actively participate in politics and contribute to good governance. This engagement should transcend personal interests and focus on advancing the well-being of the community and the nation as a whole. As the saying goes, “You can’t make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.” Meaningful progress often necessitates difficult decisions and collective effort.A study is currently underway to identify the prevalent factors holding back female participation within local council elections and to come up with recommendations to try and eliminate this political gender imbalance, the Parliamentary Secretariats for Reforms and Equality as well as for Local Government said. This scientific research was revealed by the two Parliamentary Secretaries during a joint press conference. Parliamentary Secretaries Rebecca Buttigieg and Alison Zerafa Civelli said that during the local council elections held earlier this June, female candidates made up just around 27% of the field, and that from those elected, only 28% of councillors were women. Parliamentary Secretary Zerafa Civelli expressed her commitment to seeing more just representation between the sexes in politics, even on a local government basis. She also mentioned that this would be fulfilling measure 971 of the government's manifesto. She described that the government shall continue to support local councils and work against this issue by providing the necessary tools to allow these people to be drivers for societal change. "This research should therefore be paired with a series of other activities that encourage the increased visibility of women in political life, because we truly believe in the potential of women for important decisions," Zerafa Civelli said. Parliamentary Secretary Rebecca Buttigieg stressed the importance of having a female perspective in local councils. She also noted that there are currently six localities that have no female representation. Buttigieg added that the parliamentary secretariat is implementing a proposal put forward by the technical committee that carried out a preliminary evaluation on the candidacies and results of the local council elections held earlier this year. This study should be concluded by the coming September and is being headed by Professor Carmen Sammut. She said that the gender corrective mechanism that was first implemented in the 2022 general election cannot necessarily be implemented in local council elections. Sammut concluded that based on research, other methods can be identified to ensure a more "appropriate" balance in local councils.