panalo.999
panalo.999
panalo.999
To make matters worse, the center was completely outplayed by Liu Chuanxing, a formidable opponent known for his aggressive style of play. Liu's dominance on the court exposed Beijing's center's weaknesses, leaving the team vulnerable and unable to keep up with their opponents.On the other side of Milan, city rivals Inter Milan are preparing for a crucial Champions League showdown, with speculation rife about the starting lineup for the pivotal clash. The Nerazzurri are facing a make-or-break moment in their European campaign, and manager Simone Inzaghi is tasked with making the tough decision on who will take to the field in this high-stakes encounter.
Their friendship dates back to their early days in the entertainment industry, where they first crossed paths and quickly bonded over their shared passion for acting. Since then, Xue Jia Ning and Zhao Lusi have been inseparable, often seen attending events together and showering each other with love and support on social media.BOWLING GREEN 61, NEW MEXICO STATE 60
In a recent workplace incident, an employee was dismissed for sending an email to their supervisor requesting a salary raise. The dismissal came as a shock to both the employee and their colleagues, sparking a heated debate over whether the action constituted a breach of the company's salary confidentiality policy. The incident has raised important questions about the balance between employees' rights to negotiate for fair compensation and the employer's obligation to maintain confidentiality.In recent months, the stories of many Ph. D. scholars from various regions of our valley selling dry fruits, juices and other commodities on carts have surfaced and made waves in various circles, especially in the media and on social platforms. These cases have been portrayed as tales of resilience and hard work, framing the young scholars’ choices as an inspiration. However, beneath the veil of this heroism lies a sobering reality: a stark failure of the government to harness and utilize human resources effectively as these scholars have not opted for such so-called ‘menial’ blue-collar services by choice but due to certain compulsions. Instead of becoming a parable of individual determination, this situation raises critical questions about systemic inefficiencies, economic mismanagement, and the lack of opportunities for educated youth, especially people with research background and expertise in teaching at a higher level for many years. When Ph.D. scholars, individuals who have spent years mastering a specialized field of knowledge, are seen selling dry fruits and other commodities on carts for their survival, the initial public reaction often oscillates between surprise and misplaced admiration. Many laud the perseverance and grit of such scholars, labelling them as inspirational for not giving up despite the odds. However, the true narrative is far more disconcerting. The stories of academic scholars forced into so-called ‘menial’ ‘blue-collar’ works are not inspirational but rather a glaring failure of the system that has wasted valuable human resources and failed to provide opportunities to its most educated citizens. Pursuing a doctorate degree is no small feat. It demands rigorous academic commitment, years of research, and an unrelenting dedication to the pursuit of knowledge. The scholar often works in a highly specialized field, producing original research that adds to the collective understanding of a discipline. In many cases, Ph.D. scholars make significant sacrifices—financial and personal—delaying family life, accumulating student debt, and enduring the uncertainty of academic research. Given this backdrop, the expectation is that these scholars, once equipped with their hard earned expertise, will contribute significantly to the society. They could become researchers expanding the boundaries of innovation, policy analysts, government decision makers, professors educating future generations, or skilled experts working in diverse sectors like healthcare, technology, or social sciences. The investment a nation makes in these scholars—often in the form of subsidized education or research grants—should ideally yield economic and social returns. However, when Ph.D. holders are found selling dry fruits, juices and other commodities on carts, it exposes a grim reality: the system has failed to integrate them meaningfully into the workforce. This situation underscores several critical issues. It shows that unemployment crisis has been a persistent and chronic problem in Jammu and Kashmir from a long time and its rate is rising with every passing day. According to various reports, the unemployment rate in Jammu and Kashmir has consistently remained among the highest in India. The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey has revealed that J&K has a 32 percent unemployment rate among youth and a heart-stopping 53.6 percent joblessness among females – both unemployment rates are the highest in India. It is estimated that 25 lakh youngsters are seeking jobs in the UT. The promises of economic development and job creation has not materialized for many. Instead, the reality is different, with thousands of well educated individuals either underemployed or entirely unemployed. The most troubling aspect of this story is the paradox of education without opportunity. The number of Ph.D. scholars being churned out far exceeds the available positions in academia and other government departments. This scenario raises a question mark on the system which fails to provide employment opportunities to highly educated individuals. Education, especially at the doctoral level, is intended to foster skills that can advance society, whether through research, development, or teaching. When those skills are not utilized or supported, society as a whole suffers. Regions that waste their human resources in this manner also risk brain drain. The case of these Ph.D. scholars is a stark reminder of a system that is misaligned and inadequate for meeting the needs of its most capable individuals and the basic reason for this crisis is the lack of strategic investment in employment generating sectors. There has been little effort to create industries that can absorb the educated workforce of our UT. Though the local and central government has, on multiple occasions, promised a new era of development for Jammu and Kashmir. But unfortunately these promises are yet to be fulfilled and the ground reality remains bleak. Job schemes and employment initiatives have either been too few or poorly implemented, though there are thousands of posts lying vacant in the various departments of the UT. We are yet to see any mega recruitment drive by the local government though it was promised to common masses before the assembly elections of 2024 that they will be provided with many job opportunities after the formation of government. This situation is also a broader reflection that Kashmir is aggravated by decades of conflict, which has made development and employment opportunities more challenging. Further, it is pertinent to mention here that our universities and research institutions often focus on theoretical knowledge and academic publications while neglecting the need to align research with industry requirements. As a result, many Ph.D. holders find themselves with expertise that does not translate into employability outside of academia. The stories of these Ph.D. scholars on the streets are cautionary tales which warn us that this loss is not limited to these individual scholars only but It is a collective failure that affects society at large. Each Ph.D. scholar represents an opportunity to innovate, improve governance, or advance scientific understanding. When these scholars are reduced to menial jobs, society loses out on the potential innovations they could have driven, the policies they could have shaped, or the students they could have mentored. Besides the economic argument, there may be psychological and social consequences of this alarming situation. It can lead to frustration, disillusionment, and mental health challenges among the highly educated individuals in our society when they will find their aspirations unmet. It can also discourage our younger generation from pursuing higher education, especially research, seeing that it may not lead to better job prospects and in the near future we may find the dearth of research scholars in our society. Socially, the phenomenon can create a sense of collective disillusionment. When our society finds its brightest and most hardworking individuals end up in struggles despite their efforts, it may lead to distrustfulness in institutions and authorities. Looking at the aforementioned ill effects of this phenomena, the crisis needs to be addressed with a multidimensional approach. First and foremost, there needs to be a focus on creating quality jobs in Kashmir which can be achieved by encouraging the establishment of industries that can absorb the educated workforce and the government should encourage the companies willing to invest in the region by offering tax subsidies and other incentives. Local governments should also develop various sectors which can absorb these highly educated individuals, especially research scholars. Secondly, there should also be stronger collaboration between universities and industries to align academic research with market needs, creating a pathway for Ph.D. holders to transition into industry roles. Thirdly, creating an ecosystem of entrepreneurship suitable to the skill set of highly educated individuals could be transformative. While selling dry fruits or juices on a cart might be a last resort, entrepreneurship rooted in research and development has the potential to create jobs and foster economic growth. Fourthly, looking at the weak and impotent economic setup and high unemployment rate in our UT, our research scholars should try to find job prospects and avenues in other developed regions of the country and abroad. Fifthly, as most of these scholars have already spent many years teaching in various colleges and higher secondary schools of the UT and gained a vast experience in teaching, the government should frame a suitable job policy for these scholars to end their struggles for survival. Lastly, there needs to be a cultural shift in our perspective towards our scholars and how our society views education and labour. Valuing all types of work is important, but equally, our society should have a practical understanding regarding the fact that an individual’s educational investment must yield proportionate job opportunities to him and our highly educated youth especially our scholars should not have to fight for their survival in a society that should be rewarding their hard work, steadfastness, dedication and advancing human knowledge.'Let's not panic': Canada picks up the pieces after ugly Latvia loss at world juniors
Upon investigation, it was discovered that the confusion stemmed from a misunderstanding on the part of the school registration staff. The Education Bureau confirmed that the inclusion of great-grandparents' family background in the political review form was not a mandatory requirement and should not have been requested from the students. The Bureau emphasized that the purpose of the political review process is to ensure that students meet the necessary criteria for graduation and to assess their moral and ethical conduct, not to delve into their family history beyond what is necessary.
Intech Investment Management LLC bought a new stake in Adient plc ( NYSE:ADNT – Free Report ) during the third quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the SEC. The firm bought 32,144 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $725,000. Several other hedge funds and other institutional investors have also recently bought and sold shares of the stock. Lazard Asset Management LLC purchased a new position in shares of Adient during the first quarter worth about $135,000. Price T Rowe Associates Inc. MD boosted its position in shares of Adient by 5.0% in the 1st quarter. Price T Rowe Associates Inc. MD now owns 56,647 shares of the company’s stock valued at $1,865,000 after purchasing an additional 2,687 shares during the period. Boston Partners grew its stake in Adient by 12.2% during the 1st quarter. Boston Partners now owns 19,661 shares of the company’s stock worth $647,000 after buying an additional 2,139 shares during the last quarter. First Hawaiian Bank increased its position in Adient by 68.6% during the second quarter. First Hawaiian Bank now owns 39,744 shares of the company’s stock worth $982,000 after buying an additional 16,170 shares during the period. Finally, Harbor Capital Advisors Inc. lifted its stake in Adient by 356.7% in the second quarter. Harbor Capital Advisors Inc. now owns 83,293 shares of the company’s stock valued at $2,058,000 after buying an additional 65,055 shares during the last quarter. 92.44% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds. Analysts Set New Price Targets ADNT has been the topic of a number of research reports. JPMorgan Chase & Co. lowered their target price on shares of Adient from $31.00 to $27.00 and set a “neutral” rating on the stock in a research report on Thursday, August 8th. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft reissued a “hold” rating and set a $24.00 price objective on shares of Adient in a research report on Tuesday, September 10th. Wells Fargo & Company reduced their target price on shares of Adient from $29.00 to $27.00 and set an “overweight” rating for the company in a report on Friday, September 20th. UBS Group decreased their target price on shares of Adient from $27.00 to $24.00 and set a “neutral” rating for the company in a research note on Wednesday, August 7th. Finally, Morgan Stanley dropped their price target on Adient from $21.00 to $19.00 and set an “underweight” rating on the stock in a research report on Thursday, November 14th. One analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, seven have given a hold rating and two have assigned a buy rating to the company’s stock. Based on data from MarketBeat, Adient currently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and a consensus price target of $24.38. Adient Price Performance Shares of ADNT opened at $19.23 on Friday. The company has a current ratio of 1.11, a quick ratio of 0.90 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.98. The stock’s 50 day moving average is $20.95 and its two-hundred day moving average is $23.22. Adient plc has a twelve month low of $18.53 and a twelve month high of $37.19. The firm has a market capitalization of $1.63 billion, a PE ratio of 83.61, a P/E/G ratio of 0.32 and a beta of 2.18. Adient ( NYSE:ADNT – Get Free Report ) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Friday, November 8th. The company reported $0.68 earnings per share for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.56 by $0.12. Adient had a return on equity of 6.86% and a net margin of 0.12%. The firm had revenue of $3.56 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $3.47 billion. During the same period in the previous year, the business earned $0.51 earnings per share. The company’s revenue for the quarter was down 3.7% compared to the same quarter last year. Research analysts anticipate that Adient plc will post 2.04 earnings per share for the current year. Adient Profile ( Free Report ) Adient plc engages in the design, development, manufacture, and market of seating systems and components for passenger cars, commercial vehicles, and light trucks. The company's automotive seating solutions include complete seating systems, frames, mechanisms, foams, head restraints, armrests, and trim covers. Featured Articles Five stocks we like better than Adient How to Use High Beta Stocks to Maximize Your Investing Profits The Latest 13F Filings Are In: See Where Big Money Is Flowing 3 Healthcare Dividend Stocks to Buy 3 Penny Stocks Ready to Break Out in 2025 What is a Bond Market Holiday? How to Invest and Trade FMC, Mosaic, Nutrien: Top Agricultural Stocks With Big Potential Want to see what other hedge funds are holding ADNT? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Adient plc ( NYSE:ADNT – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Adient Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Adient and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .On the 9th of this month, global oil prices saw a remarkable increase, with the price of crude oil surging significantly. This spike in oil prices has caught the attention of investors, governments, and consumers around the world, as it could potentially impact various aspects of the global economy.
Citigroup Inc. lifted its stake in Ameris Bancorp ( NASDAQ:ABCB – Free Report ) by 32.5% in the 3rd quarter, according to the company in its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm owned 142,122 shares of the bank’s stock after buying an additional 34,881 shares during the period. Citigroup Inc. owned approximately 0.21% of Ameris Bancorp worth $8,867,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A number of other large investors have also added to or reduced their stakes in ABCB. Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. raised its holdings in Ameris Bancorp by 9.5% in the 3rd quarter. Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. now owns 907,140 shares of the bank’s stock valued at $56,596,000 after acquiring an additional 79,060 shares in the last quarter. Intech Investment Management LLC increased its position in shares of Ameris Bancorp by 152.3% in the third quarter. Intech Investment Management LLC now owns 15,599 shares of the bank’s stock worth $973,000 after purchasing an additional 9,417 shares during the period. Pathstone Holdings LLC raised its stake in Ameris Bancorp by 5.8% in the third quarter. Pathstone Holdings LLC now owns 25,065 shares of the bank’s stock valued at $1,564,000 after purchasing an additional 1,364 shares in the last quarter. LMR Partners LLP bought a new stake in Ameris Bancorp during the third quarter worth about $311,000. Finally, Thrivent Financial for Lutherans grew its stake in Ameris Bancorp by 5.0% during the third quarter. Thrivent Financial for Lutherans now owns 62,566 shares of the bank’s stock worth $3,903,000 after buying an additional 3,005 shares in the last quarter. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 91.64% of the company’s stock. Ameris Bancorp Stock Performance Shares of Ameris Bancorp stock opened at $70.28 on Friday. The company’s 50 day moving average price is $65.06 and its two-hundred day moving average price is $58.10. The firm has a market capitalization of $4.85 billion, a P/E ratio of 14.64 and a beta of 1.01. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.13, a current ratio of 1.03 and a quick ratio of 1.01. Ameris Bancorp has a fifty-two week low of $42.25 and a fifty-two week high of $74.56. Ameris Bancorp Announces Dividend The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Monday, October 7th. Stockholders of record on Monday, September 30th were paid a $0.15 dividend. This represents a $0.60 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 0.85%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend was Monday, September 30th. Ameris Bancorp’s dividend payout ratio is currently 12.50%. Insider Activity at Ameris Bancorp In other Ameris Bancorp news, Director Robert Dale Ezzell sold 8,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Wednesday, November 6th. The shares were sold at an average price of $69.91, for a total value of $559,280.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the director now directly owns 27,444 shares in the company, valued at approximately $1,918,610.04. This represents a 22.57 % decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which can be accessed through this link . 5.50% of the stock is owned by company insiders. Wall Street Analyst Weigh In Several equities analysts have recently commented on the stock. Raymond James upgraded shares of Ameris Bancorp from a “market perform” rating to an “outperform” rating and set a $67.00 target price for the company in a research report on Monday, October 28th. StockNews.com upgraded shares of Ameris Bancorp from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Thursday, October 31st. Truist Financial cut their target price on Ameris Bancorp from $73.00 to $68.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research note on Monday, October 28th. Finally, Stephens lifted their price target on Ameris Bancorp from $64.00 to $67.00 and gave the company an “equal weight” rating in a research note on Monday, October 28th. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and five have issued a buy rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat, Ameris Bancorp has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $66.67. Read Our Latest Stock Analysis on Ameris Bancorp Ameris Bancorp Profile ( Free Report ) Ameris Bancorp operates as the bank holding company for Ameris Bank that provides range of banking services to retail and commercial customers. It operates through five segments: Banking Division, Retail Mortgage Division, Warehouse Lending Division, SBA Division, and Premium Finance Division. The company offers commercial and retail checking, regular interest-bearing savings, money market, individual retirement, and certificates of deposit accounts. Featured Articles Receive News & Ratings for Ameris Bancorp Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Ameris Bancorp and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .A shocking case of embezzlement involving a subsidiary company's treasurer has recently come to light, revealing a significant financial loss of close to 20 million yuan. The incident, which took place in a subsidiary of Hainan Yedao Company, began to unravel in October last year when the embezzlement was first reported. However, it was only in April this year that the full extent of the embezzlement scandal was disclosed.A 9th telecoms firm has been hit by a massive Chinese espionage campaign, the White House says
An evil that must be ended In Pakistan, the deep entrenchment of unethical practices within both social and political spheres has led to a situation where such behaviour is no longer seen as an anomaly but as the norm. Bribery, favouritism, and the manipulation of systems are often considered not moral failings but rather pragmatic tools for navigating the complexities of bureaucracy or overcoming the barriers of political hurdles. This normalization of corruption is the result of a long history marked by political instability, weak governance, and the absence of strong institutional frameworks. In such an environment, those who strive to uphold integrity are often seen as naive or unrealistic, while those who engage in these morally questionable practices are regarded as smart or resourceful. This mindset fuels a cycle in which dishonesty becomes the currency of success, reinforcing a system that rewards short-term gains over long-term justice and perpetuating a culture of corruption across all levels of society. The feeling of impunity among the wealthy and powerful elites only strengthens this cycle. Politicians, generals, judges, bureaucrats, and businessmen who hold significant influence in Pakistan often feel immune to prosecution, and many believe that their wealth and social connections protect them from accountability. This sense of powerlessness within the public leads to a lack of trust in institutions, reinforcing the idea that corruption is an unavoidable part of Pakistan’s political and social structure. As a result, many citizens view corruption not as a personal moral failing but as a necessary survival tactic in an unjust system where the ruling elites often remain unscathed. This systemic acceptance of corruption has contributed to Pakistan’s steady decline on Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). The failure of political and administrative leadership to implement meaningful reforms is a major reason for this persistent decline. Structural factors, such as a politicized legal system and weak institutions, have made it difficult to address corruption at its roots. Political patronage and cronyism complicate efforts to break the chains of corruption, as powerful elites often control state institutions and manipulate the system to their advantage. Moreover, political instability and changes in leadership frequently result in anti-corruption measures being viewed not as reforms but as political campaigns aimed at discrediting rivals. To effectively combat corruption, Pakistan needs to undertake comprehensive reforms across multiple sectors. A robust and transparent judicial system is essential for holding corrupt individuals accountable. Furthermore, political financing must be more strictly regulated, as corruption often stems from the unregulated flow of money in politics. Comprehensive reforms in political financing can help reduce the influence of money in elections and governance, ensuring that public office is not a tool for private gain. Another important step is to ensure the protection of whistleblowers, who often face retaliation for exposing corrupt practices. Establishing a legal framework that safeguards whistleblowers would encourage more citizens to come forward and report corruption without fear of reprisal. Despite the formation of institutions like NAB, which is tasked with investigating corruption and recovering misappropriated funds, the anti-corruption efforts in Pakistan have largely been ineffective. NAB has frequently been criticized for selective accountability, with those aligned with the ruling party often avoiding scrutiny, while political opponents are targeted. The lack of independence and slow progress in investigations has also tarnished its credibility. The pace at which cases are handled is often too slow, and in many instances, corrupt individuals settle for relatively minor penalties, which further erodes public trust in the system. Other anti-corruption bodies, such as the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and provincial offices, also face similar challenges due to political interference, lack of resources, and ineffective enforcement. The consequences of corruption in Pakistan ripple through vital sectors like healthcare, education, and law enforcement, causing profound harm to society. In healthcare, corruption diverts resources, fuels the theft of funds, and leads to the distribution of substandard medicines, leaving the poor to suffer in an inefficient system. Bribes for basic medical services erode trust, worsening public health. In education, misappropriated funds and bribery for promotions or grades create a broken system where ghost schools exist only on paper, perpetuating inequality and hindering progress. This corruption fosters a cycle of ignorance that stunts both individual potential and national growth. In law enforcement, bribery and political interference compromise the rule of law, enabling criminals to flourish and eroding justice. Such systemic corruption not only weakens institutions but also poisons the moral fabric of society. To break free from this cycle, Pakistan must strive for integrity and accountability, embracing justice as the foundation for true progress and equality. Corruption, with its deep and lasting impact, continues to hinder Pakistan’s development, eroding trust in institutions and deepening social and economic divides. It obstructs the potential for growth by diverting critical resources that could otherwise be used to foster prosperity, improve public services, and reduce inequality. As corruption becomes entrenched in the political system, citizens lose faith in the democratic process, leading to political apathy, disillusionment, and a sense of powerlessness. The resulting inefficiency and inequality trap the most vulnerable in a cycle of poverty, denying them access to essential services such as education, healthcare, and justice. Without substantial reforms and a genuine commitment to transparency, the cycle of corruption will persist, keeping Pakistan from realizing its full potential. Engaging civil society, strengthening media oversight, and ensuring public access to government records are key steps towards increasing accountability and fostering a culture of openness. Ultimately, only by confronting corruption head-on can Pakistan break free from its current constraints and begin building a future founded on justice, integrity, and progress, one where the ideals of democracy and fairness are not just aspirations, but attainable realities for all. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );As Dembélé's contract with Barcelona entered its final year, speculation swirled regarding his future at the club. While negotiations for a contract extension were reportedly initiated by the club, Dembélé's camp remained steadfast in their demands, leading to a stalemate that further intensified the existing tensions between the player and the club. The player's insistence on securing a deal that aligns with his perceived market value and future prospects demonstrated a shrewd business acumen and a keen understanding of his own worth in the ever-evolving football landscape.
