slot machine free coins

slot machine free coins The Intelligent Real Estate ETF ( NASDAQ:REAI – Get Free Report ) declared a dividend on Thursday, December 26th, NASDAQ Dividends reports. Investors of record on Friday, December 27th will be paid a dividend of 0.1177 per share on Tuesday, December 31st. The ex-dividend date is Friday, December 27th. Intelligent Real Estate ETF Stock Down 1.7 % REAI opened at $20.81 on Friday. The stock has a market capitalization of $3.54 million, a price-to-earnings ratio of 28.79 and a beta of 1.03. Intelligent Real Estate ETF has a twelve month low of $18.39 and a twelve month high of $23.33. The company has a 50-day simple moving average of $22.05 and a 200 day simple moving average of $21.65. About Intelligent Real Estate ETF ( Get Free Report ) Recommended Stories Receive News & Ratings for Intelligent Real Estate ETF Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Intelligent Real Estate ETF and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .LAHORE: Prime Minister (PM) Shehbaz Sharif has directed authorities to bring tax defaulters into the tax net and take strict action against non-compliance. He made these remarks while presiding over a crucial review meeting on strategies to enhance revenue collection ARY News reported on Saturday. During the meeting, officials briefed the Prime Minister on the installation and monitoring of video analytics in the sugar industry. Highlighting the importance of technology, the Prime Minister said, “Improving the Federal Board of Revenue’s (FBR) performance through technology is the government’s top priority.” He emphasized that the use of video analytics in the sugar industry would significantly improve revenue collection, eliminate hoarding, and help stabilize prices. “Our utmost effort is to ensure the availability of sugar at affordable prices for the public,” he stated, directing regular monitoring of sugar stocks to maintain an uninterrupted supply chain. The prime minister also ordered stringent and indiscriminate action against tax evasion and under-reporting by sugar mills. He underscored that ongoing measures for FBR’s digitization would bring billions of rupees in benefits to the national treasury. Additionally, the prime minister instructed the swift completion of FBR’s value chain digitization and called for the rapid implementation of video analytics in the cement and tobacco industries. The meeting was attended by Federal Minister for Economic Affairs Ahad Khan Cheema, Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Attaullah Tarar, Minister of State for Finance Ali Pervaiz Malik, and senior government officials.( MENAFN - Jordan Times) EDINBURGH/TRONDHEIM – When Russian President Vladimir Putin gave the order to invade Ukraine in February 2022, he surely did not expect that one of Russia's neighbors would be the main beneficiary of his war. Yet, as Russian hydrocarbon exports to Europe cratered in the wake of the invasion, Norway emerged as the continent's largest supplier. Owing to the steep increase in gas and oil prices that followed the outbreak of the war, Norway ultimately enjoyed a massive financial windfall. In 2022 and 2023, it reaped nearly kr1.3 trillion ($111 billion) in additional revenue from gas exports, according to recent estimates from the finance ministry. Why, then, has Norway allocated only a little more than $3.1 billion for support to Ukraine in its 2025 budget? Combined with what it contributed in 2024, Norway's support for Ukraine amounts to less than 5 per cent of its two-year war windfall. For comparison, Germany – Europe's largest single contributor – provided $16.3 billion in military, financial, and humanitarian support for Ukraine from January 2022 until the end of October 2024, and the United States has contributed $92 billion. But while Norway's two-year windfall is larger than the US and German contributions combined, Norway's support for Ukraine as a share of GDP, at 0.7 per cent, ranks only ninth in Europe, far behind Denmark (2 per cent) and Estonia (2.2 per cent). Not only does Norway have the capacity to be making far more of a difference to the outcome of the war and the subsequent civilian reconstruction; it has an obvious moral obligation to do so. Given that its excess revenues are a direct consequence of Russia's war, surely a greater share of them should go to those fighting and dying on the front lines to keep their country free. Go beyond the headlines to understand the issues, forces, and trends shaping the US presidential election – and the likely implications of its outcome. By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service. Instead, Norway's government has effectively decided to be a war profiteer, clinging greedily to its lucky gains. To their credit, opposition parties have proposed higher levels of support for Ukraine, ultimately pushing up the sum that the government initially proposed. No party, however, has come anywhere close to suggesting a transfer of the total war windfall to Ukraine. The Norwegian government's position is puzzling, given that Norway shares a border with Russia and has long relied on its allies' support for its defense. Its own national security would be jeopardised if Russia wins the war or is militarily emboldened by a peace agreement skewed in its favour. Moreover, it is not as though Norway would be immiserated by transferring its war windfall to Ukraine. This windfall represents about 6 per cent of its sovereign wealth fund, the world's largest, with assets valued at $1.7 trillion – or $308,000 for every Norwegian. True, Norway channels all government revenue from oil and gas production to its sovereign wealth fund, and no more than 3 per cent of the value of the fund can be drawn down and transferred to the government budget each year. This rule helps limit the effects on inflation and the exchange rate, and ensures that the fund exists in perpetuity. But as a macroeconomic and national savings instrument, the drawdown rule was not designed with wartime demands in mind. It therefore should not be seen as an obstacle for a larger transfer to Ukraine. Since such a transfer would not enter the Norwegian economy, it would have no domestic inflationary or other macroeconomic implications. (With the 2025 budget largely set, it would need to be an extrabudgetary measure justified by the wartime circumstances.) This is not the first time that Norway's hoarding of its war windfall has been an issue. But it is the first time that we have been given an official estimate of the windfall's value. The finance ministry has assigned a number to natural-gas export revenues in excess of what they would have been had gas prices remained around their five-year pre-invasion average. Although such counterfactuals will always be subject to uncertainty and debate, the official estimate is the closest we will get to a value for Norway's war windfall. In fact, the actual number is probably much higher, as the estimate does not include excess revenues resulting from higher oil prices following the invasion. With Europeans wringing their hands about the implications of Donald Trump's return to power, Norway's government and parliament should transfer the windfall to Ukraine in the form of military and financial support. Norway has a powerful national-security interest in doing the right thing. Håvard Halland, a former senior economist at the World Bank and OECD, is professor of Sustainable Finance at Heriot-Watt University. Knut Anton Mork is professor emeritus of Economics at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. MENAFN21122024000028011005ID1109019819 Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Gatestone Institute senior fellow Gordon Chang unpacks national security issues with China on The Ingraham Angle. FIRST ON FOX: A pro-tech advocacy group has released a new report warning of the growing threat posed by China’s artificial intelligence technology and its open-source approach that could threaten the national and economic security of the United States. The report, published by American Edge Project, states that "China is rapidly advancing its own open-source ecosystem as an alternative to American technology and using it as a Trojan horse to implant its CCP values into global infrastructure." "Their progress is both significant and concerning: Chinese-developed open-source AI tools are already outperforming Western models on key benchmarks, while operating at dramatically lower costs, accelerating global adoption. Through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which spans more than 155 countries on four continents, and its Digital Silk Road (DSR), China is exporting its technology worldwide, fostering increased global dependence, undermining democratic norms, and threatening U.S. leadership and global security." The report outlines how Chinese AI models censor historical events that could paint China in a bad light, deny or minimize human rights abuses, and filter criticism of Chinese political leaders. CATE BLANCHETT WORRIES AI COULD 'TOTALLY REPLACE ANYONE' China's President Xi Jinping attends a meeting with Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, in Brasilia, Brazil, Nov. 20, 2024. (REUTERS/Adriano Machado) "China is executing an ambitious $1.4 trillion plan to dominate global technology by 2030, with open-source systems as the cornerstone of its AI strategy," the report states. "While many Western companies focus on paid, proprietary AI models, China is aggressively promoting free and low-cost alternatives to drive rapid global adoption." The report continues, "By making much of its AI technology freely accessible, Beijing aims to ensure its systems and standards become embedded in the world’s financial, manufacturing and communications backbone. Through coordinated action between government and industry, China is working to reshape the global technology landscape while programming CCP values and control mechanisms into critical systems worldwide." CHINA’S SCI-FI SPHERICAL DEATH STAR-LIKE ROBOT COP USES AI, FACIAL RECOGNITION TO TRACK CRIMINALS The report explains that China is "racing" to deploy AI while the United States is bogged down on prioritizing AI regulation. "While American and European governments focus on regulating AI, China is aggressively pushing its AI systems into global markets," the report states, adding that, "This playbook mirrors China’s successful strategy with 5G technology, where Huawei gained dominant market share through aggressive pricing and rapid deployment before Western nations could respond effectively. Now in AI, one Chinese firm alone, Alibaba Cloud, has released over 100 open-source models in 29 different languages, flooding global markets while Western companies must navigate increasingly complex regulatory requirements." CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP China's President Xi Jinping talks after joining a group photo during the G20 Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Monday, Nov. 18, 2024. (AP Photo/Eraldo Peres) The report lays out the differences between China and U.S. AI model responses and provides policy recommendations to "preserve U.S. AI leadership," which includes seizing the "historic opportunity to secure lasting American AI leadership" and avoiding "unilateral restrictions on exporting and access to U.S. AI systems. "If America loses the global race to dominate both open-source and closed-source AI technology, authoritarian Chinese systems will write the future, and Washington policymakers can't let that happen," Doug Kelly, CEO of the American Edge Project, told Fox News Digital. The report concludes that "the implications of Chinese leadership in global AI development are profound." "A world of unchecked, Beijing-built AI ecosystems would be a major blow to the U.S. and to humanity writ large," the Center for New American Security says in the report. "If Chinese AI goes global, so too will brazen non-compliance with international agreements on the technology." Andrew Mark Miller is a reporter at Fox News. Find him on Twitter @andymarkmiller and email tips to AndrewMark.Miller@Fox.com.

Morgan Rogers looked to have given Unai Emery’s side another famous win when he slammed a loose ball home at the death, but referee Jesus Gil Manzano ruled Diego Carlos to have fouled Juve goalkeeper Michele Di Gregorio and the goal was chalked off. It was a disappointment for Villa, who remain unbeaten at home in their debut Champions League campaign and are still in contention to qualify automatically for the last 16. A very controversial finish at Villa Park 😲 Morgan Rogers' late goal is ruled out for a foul on Juventus goalkeeper Michele Di Gregorio and the match ends 0-0 ❌ 📺 @tntsports & @discoveryplusUK pic.twitter.com/MyYL5Vdy3r — Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) November 27, 2024 Emiliano Martinez had earlier displayed why he was named the best goalkeeper in the world as his wonder save kept his side level in the second half. The Argentina international paraded his two Yashin Trophies on the pitch before kick-off at Villa Park and then showed why he won back-to-back FIFA awards when he denied Francisco Conceicao. Before Rogers’ moment of drama in the fourth minute of added time, the closest Villa came to scoring was in the first half when Lucas Digne’s free-kick hit the crossbar. But a draw was a fair result which leaves Villa out of the top eight on goal difference and Juventus down in 19th. Before the game Emery called Juventus one of the “best teams in the world, historically and now”, but this was an Italian side down to the bare bones. Only 14 outfield players made the trip from Turin, with striker Dusan Vlahovic among those who stayed behind. The opening 30 minutes were forgettable before the game opened up. Ollie Watkins, still chasing his first Champions League goal, had Villa’s first presentable chance as he lashed an effort straight at Di Gregorio. Matty Cash then had a vicious effort from the resulting corner which was blocked by Federico Gatti and started a counter-attack which ended in Juventus striker Timothy Weah. Villa came closest to breaking the deadlock at the end of the first half when Digne’s 20-yard free-kick clipped the top of the crossbar and went over. Martinez then produced his brilliant save just after the hour. A corner made its way through to the far post where Conceicao was primed to head in at the far post, but Martinez sprawled himself across goal to scoop the ball away. How has he kept that one out?! 🤯 Emi Martinez with an INCREDIBLE save to keep it goalless at Villa Park ⛔️ 📺 @tntsports & @discoveryplusUK pic.twitter.com/OkcWHB7YIk — Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) November 27, 2024 Replays showed most of the ball went over the line, but the Argentinian got there with millimetres to spare. At the other end another fine goal-line block denied John McGinn as Manuel Locatelli got his foot in the way with Di Gregorio beaten. The game looked to be petering out until a last-gasp free-kick saw Rogers slam home, but whistle-happy official Gil Manzano halted the celebrations by ruling the goal out.

HH the Amir’s 2024: Prestigious honors and bold political reforms

TC Energy Co. (TRP) To Go Ex-Dividend on December 31stPhilip Dwyer is alleged to have assaulted the 66-year-old father of People Before Profit candidate Kellie McConnell during an incident on Main Street in Bray, Co Wicklow . Videos and images from the incident show Mr Dwyer, who is running as an independent, brandishing an extendable baton. “Gardaí are investigating an alleged assault which occurred on the Main Street in Bray on Sunday morning, November 24th, 2024,” a Garda spokesman said in response to queries. Mr Dwyer did not respond to requests for comment. On social media, he said he was the one who was assaulted. He posted that he was attacked by “pro abortion pro transgender Social Democrats” alongside a video showing the People Before Profit team. The video does not depict any assault. Another video captured by the People Before Profit team shows Mr Dwyer with the baton raised, claiming he had been pushed. He can be heard saying, “You abortionists, get out of here, outside a Christian church.” This video also does not capture an assault by any party. Ms McConnell told The Irish Times she was campaigning with her parents outside the Holy Redeemer Church on Sunday morning when Mr Dwyer approached her and asked her to debate with him. She said she knew from experience there was no point in debating with Mr Dwyer and told him she did not want to engage with him. Ms McConnell said she decided to cut short the canvas and leave the area. She said at this point Mr Dwyer pushed her father, whom she described as a disabled pensioner, to the ground before producing an extendable baton. [ Political parties with far-right views on immigration form alliance to maximise election chances Opens in new window ] She said her parents later made a report to gardaí and she reported the incident to the crime protection officer designated to her as an election candidate. Ms McConnell expressed frustration with the Garda response to the incident and said they did not seem to know who Mr Dwyer was. When her parents first went to the Garda station they were told to return later to make a statement as gardaí were too busy, she said. She also said the crime prevention officer’s phone was turned off when she initially tried contacting them. Mr Dwyer, who is from Tallaght, Dublin, has run in multiple local, European and general elections, failing to win a seat each time. He describes himself as a citizen journalist and has built up a significant social media following by posting provocative videos on immigration, many of which contain false information. The former postman was previously a member of the far-right National Party before leaving after he was criticised for filming a political video at the grave of murder victim Ashling Murphy . He subsequently helped found the Ireland First party and ran under its banner in the local and European elections earlier this year. He has registered to run in the upcoming general election as an independent and has listed his occupation as “student journalist”. Conor Gallagher is Crime and Security Correspondent of The Irish Times

Delta Air Lines's DAL short percent of float has risen 15.36% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 35.19 million shares sold short , which is 6.16% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 4.21 days to cover their short positions on average. Why Short Interest Matters Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. Short selling is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises. Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish. See Also: List of the most shorted stocks Delta Air Lines Short Interest Graph (3 Months) As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Delta Air Lines has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted. Comparing Delta Air Lines's Short Interest Against Its Peers Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis. According to Benzinga Pro , Delta Air Lines's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 9.02%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers. Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it. This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.ATLANTA — Jimmy Carter, the peanut farmer who won the presidency in the wake of the Watergate scandal and Vietnam War, endured humbling defeat after one tumultuous term and then redefined life after the White House as a global humanitarian, has died. He was 100 years old. The longest-lived American president died on Sunday, more than a year after entering hospice care, at his home in the small town of Plains, Georgia, where he and his wife, Rosalynn, who died at 96 in November 2023, spent most of their lives, The Carter Center said. Businessman, Navy officer, evangelist, politician, negotiator, author, woodworker, citizen of the world — Carter forged a path that still challenges political assumptions and stands out among the 45 men who reached the nation’s highest office. The 39th president leveraged his ambition with a keen intellect, deep religious faith and prodigious work ethic, conducting diplomatic missions into his 80s and building houses for the poor well into his 90s. People are also reading... “My faith demands — this is not optional — my faith demands that I do whatever I can, wherever I am, whenever I can, for as long as I can, with whatever I have to try to make a difference,” Carter once said. A moderate Democrat, Carter entered the 1976 presidential race as a little-known Georgia governor with a broad smile, outspoken Baptist mores and technocratic plans reflecting his education as an engineer. His no-frills campaign depended on public financing, and his promise not to deceive the American people resonated after Richard Nixon’s disgrace and U.S. defeat in southeast Asia. “If I ever lie to you, if I ever make a misleading statement, don’t vote for me. I would not deserve to be your president,” Carter repeated before narrowly beating Republican incumbent Gerald Ford, who lost popularity after pardoning Nixon. Carter governed amid Cold War pressures, turbulent oil markets and social upheaval over racism, women’s rights and America’s global role. His most acclaimed achievement in office was a Mideast peace deal that he brokered by keeping Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin at the bargaining table for 13 days in 1978. That Camp David experience inspired the post-presidential center where Carter would establish so much of his legacy. Yet Carter’s electoral coalition splintered under double-digit inflation, gasoline lines and the 444-day hostage crisis in Iran. His bleakest hour came when eight Americans died in a failed hostage rescue in April 1980, helping to ensure his landslide defeat to Republican Ronald Reagan. Carter acknowledged in his 2020 “White House Diary” that he could be “micromanaging” and “excessively autocratic,” complicating dealings with Congress and the federal bureaucracy. He also turned a cold shoulder to Washington’s news media and lobbyists, not fully appreciating their influence on his political fortunes. “It didn’t take us long to realize that the underestimation existed, but by that time we were not able to repair the mistake,” Carter told historians in 1982, suggesting that he had “an inherent incompatibility” with Washington insiders. Carter insisted his overall approach was sound and that he achieved his primary objectives — to “protect our nation’s security and interests peacefully” and “enhance human rights here and abroad” — even if he fell spectacularly short of a second term. Ignominious defeat, though, allowed for renewal. The Carters founded The Carter Center in 1982 as a first-of-its-kind base of operations, asserting themselves as international peacemakers and champions of democracy, public health and human rights. “I was not interested in just building a museum or storing my White House records and memorabilia,” Carter wrote in a memoir published after his 90th birthday. “I wanted a place where we could work.” That work included easing nuclear tensions in North and South Korea, helping to avert a U.S. invasion of Haiti and negotiating cease-fires in Bosnia and Sudan. By 2022, The Carter Center had declared at least 113 elections in Latin America, Asia and Africa to be free or fraudulent. Recently, the center began monitoring U.S. elections as well. Carter’s stubborn self-assuredness and even self-righteousness proved effective once he was unencumbered by the Washington order, sometimes to the point of frustrating his successors. He went “where others are not treading,” he said, to places like Ethiopia, Liberia and North Korea, where he secured the release of an American who had wandered across the border in 2010. “I can say what I like. I can meet whom I want. I can take on projects that please me and reject the ones that don’t,” Carter said. He announced an arms-reduction-for-aid deal with North Korea without clearing the details with Bill Clinton’s White House. He openly criticized President George W. Bush for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He also criticized America’s approach to Israel with his 2006 book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.” And he repeatedly countered U.S. administrations by insisting North Korea should be included in international affairs, a position that most aligned Carter with Republican President Donald Trump. Among the center’s many public health initiatives, Carter vowed to eradicate the guinea worm parasite during his lifetime, and nearly achieved it: Cases dropped from millions in the 1980s to nearly a handful. With hardhats and hammers, the Carters also built homes with Habitat for Humanity. The Nobel committee’s 2002 Peace Prize cites his “untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development.” Carter should have won it alongside Sadat and Begin in 1978, the chairman added. Carter accepted the recognition, saying there was more work to be done. “The world is now, in many ways, a more dangerous place,” he said. “The greater ease of travel and communication has not been matched by equal understanding and mutual respect.” Carter’s globetrotting took him to remote villages where he met little “Jimmy Carters,” so named by admiring parents. But he spent most of his days in the same one-story Plains house — expanded and guarded by Secret Service agents — where they lived before he became governor. He regularly taught Sunday School lessons at Maranatha Baptist Church until his mobility declined and the coronavirus pandemic raged. Those sessions drew visitors from around the world to the small sanctuary where Carter will receive his final send-off after a state funeral at Washington’s National Cathedral. The common assessment that he was a better ex-president than president rankled Carter and his allies. His prolific post-presidency gave him a brand above politics, particularly for Americans too young to witness him in office. But Carter also lived long enough to see biographers and historians reassess his White House years more generously. His record includes the deregulation of key industries, reduction of U.S. dependence on foreign oil, cautious management of the national debt and notable legislation on the environment, education and mental health. He focused on human rights in foreign policy, pressuring dictators to release thousands of political prisoners. He acknowledged America’s historical imperialism, pardoned Vietnam War draft evaders and relinquished control of the Panama Canal. He normalized relations with China. “I am not nominating Jimmy Carter for a place on Mount Rushmore,” Stuart Eizenstat, Carter’s domestic policy director, wrote in a 2018 book. “He was not a great president” but also not the “hapless and weak” caricature voters rejected in 1980, Eizenstat said. Rather, Carter was “good and productive” and “delivered results, many of which were realized only after he left office.” Madeleine Albright, a national security staffer for Carter and Clinton’s secretary of state, wrote in Eizenstat’s forward that Carter was “consequential and successful” and expressed hope that “perceptions will continue to evolve” about his presidency. “Our country was lucky to have him as our leader,” said Albright, who died in 2022. Jonathan Alter, who penned a comprehensive Carter biography published in 2020, said in an interview that Carter should be remembered for “an epic American life” spanning from a humble start in a home with no electricity or indoor plumbing through decades on the world stage across two centuries. “He will likely go down as one of the most misunderstood and underestimated figures in American history,” Alter told The Associated Press. Be the first to know Get local news delivered to your inbox!Morgan Rogers looked to have given Unai Emery’s side another famous win when he slammed a loose ball home at the death, but referee Jesus Gil Manzano ruled Diego Carlos to have fouled Juve goalkeeper Michele Di Gregorio and the goal was chalked off. It was a disappointment for Villa, who remain unbeaten at home in their debut Champions League campaign and are still in contention to qualify automatically for the last 16. A very controversial finish at Villa Park 😲 Morgan Rogers' late goal is ruled out for a foul on Juventus goalkeeper Michele Di Gregorio and the match ends 0-0 ❌ 📺 @tntsports & @discoveryplusUK pic.twitter.com/MyYL5Vdy3r — Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) November 27, 2024 Emiliano Martinez had earlier displayed why he was named the best goalkeeper in the world as his wonder save kept his side level in the second half. The Argentina international paraded his two Yashin Trophies on the pitch before kick-off at Villa Park and then showed why he won back-to-back FIFA awards when he denied Francisco Conceicao. Before Rogers’ moment of drama in the fourth minute of added time, the closest Villa came to scoring was in the first half when Lucas Digne’s free-kick hit the crossbar. But a draw was a fair result which leaves Villa out of the top eight on goal difference and Juventus down in 19th. Before the game Emery called Juventus one of the “best teams in the world, historically and now”, but this was an Italian side down to the bare bones. Only 14 outfield players made the trip from Turin, with striker Dusan Vlahovic among those who stayed behind. The opening 30 minutes were forgettable before the game opened up. Ollie Watkins, still chasing his first Champions League goal, had Villa’s first presentable chance as he lashed an effort straight at Di Gregorio. Matty Cash then had a vicious effort from the resulting corner which was blocked by Federico Gatti and started a counter-attack which ended in Juventus striker Timothy Weah. Villa came closest to breaking the deadlock at the end of the first half when Digne’s 20-yard free-kick clipped the top of the crossbar and went over. Martinez then produced his brilliant save just after the hour. A corner made its way through to the far post where Conceicao was primed to head in at the far post, but Martinez sprawled himself across goal to scoop the ball away. How has he kept that one out?! 🤯 Emi Martinez with an INCREDIBLE save to keep it goalless at Villa Park ⛔️ 📺 @tntsports & @discoveryplusUK pic.twitter.com/OkcWHB7YIk — Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) November 27, 2024 Replays showed most of the ball went over the line, but the Argentinian got there with millimetres to spare. At the other end another fine goal-line block denied John McGinn as Manuel Locatelli got his foot in the way with Di Gregorio beaten. The game looked to be petering out until a last-gasp free-kick saw Rogers slam home, but whistle-happy official Gil Manzano halted the celebrations by ruling the goal out.

Christmas celebrations across churches

MGX Deadline: MGX Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Metagenomi, Inc. Securities LawsuitAeluma joins Optica as corporate member

Among numerous cryptocurrencies, Binance Chain (BNB) stands out as one of the best altcoins to buy because of its importance in the thriving Binance ecosystem. Yet, despite showing bullish strength, market watchers are increasingly shifting their attention to 1Fuel (OF T), a revolutionary solution that is available for the low presale entry of just $0.012. In this article, you’ll discover why analysts see 1Fuel as the best presale crypto from this moment and why it will likely outperform BNB in the current bull cycle. BNB: One of the best altcoins to buy The native coin of Binance Chain, Binance Coin (BNB), is displaying growth patterns in Q4 2024. Like many cryptocurrencies, Binance Coin capitalized on Bitcoin’s recent bull charge, reaching its all-time high of $788 on December 4. The price corrected to the $690 level shortly afterward. Yet Investors predict BNB will only go up from here, citing heightened network participation thanks to its BNBHackathon and Most Valuable Builder accelerator programs. As of this writing, BNB is trading at $662.60, showing a 157% price increase in the past year. While experts foresee long-term market gains for Binance Coin, many are convinced the best altcoin to buy at this moment is 1Fuel. OFT is well on its way to generating 100x returns by 2025, driven by technological advancements and its lucrative low presale entry. Why analysts back 1Fuel as the best presale crypto BNB is strong in many ways, but it can’t seem to stop 1Fuel from capturing market attention, owing to the latter’s compelling use cases. For example, 1Fuel addresses the number one problem with blockchains: compatibility issues when migrating assets across different chains and networks. With just a single click, you can specify the assets you want to buy, then sit back as 1Fuel’s cutting-edge AI works tirelessly to execute the technical swaps and acquire your assets. Moreover, unlike Binance, 1Fuel’s P2P exchange platform allows users to trade assets without relying on centralized intermediaries. By facilitating smooth peer-to-peer transactions, the 1Fuel crypto exchange adds an extra layer of security to transactions and promotes decentralization, which reduces the risk of manipulation and censorship. 1Fuel’s token also has a much higher appeal than BNB since 1Fuel is shaping up to deliver explosive returns in the coming months. At $0.012, the ongoing 1Fuel presale offers OFT at the lowest price it will ever be. You don’t want to miss 100x capital returns when 1Fuel hits the exchanges in 2025. BNB Vs. OFT: Which is the best altcoin to buy Both BNB and OFT offer considerable value to investors looking for the best altcoins to buy. However, they cater to two entirely different investor preferences by offering distinct growth trajectories. Through its established ecosystem, Binance Chain offers stability. This makes BNB a relatively safe bet, as its growth is predicted to be steady rather than explosive. OFT, on the other hand, offers massive growth thanks to its low presale entry. During this presale alone, early investors expect returns of 500%, solidifying OFT’s status as the best presale crypto to buy now. Conclusion BNB remains a top altcoin in the eyes of investors. But at the same time, 1Fuel emerges as a formidable competitor with massive growth potential and unique use cases. As the demand for utility-driven crypto solutions continues to grow, 1Fuel’s focus on one-click cross-chain transactions will give it a unique edge in the crowded cold wallet market. Whether you’re a seasoned investor or an early adopter, the time to act is now. Join the 1Fuel presale and experience rapid 500% returns during the presale alone! Presale: https://www.1fuel.io/ Telegram: https://t.me/Portal_1FUEL X: https://x.com/1fuel_?s=21 Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp _____________ Disclaimer: Analytics Insight does not provide financial advice or guidance. Also note that the cryptocurrencies mentioned/listed on the website could potentially be scams, i.e. designed to induce you to invest financial resources that may be lost forever and not be recoverable once investments are made. You are responsible for conducting your own research (DYOR) before making any investments. Read more here.NoneDiscussions are underway regarding the future of the so-called “Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria” following the fall of Bashar Al-Assad’s regime this month. The Kurdish-led region, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), has become a focal point due to its strategic importance and ongoing military tensions with Turkish-backed factions. The area is considered Syria’s “oil and gas reservoir,” making its economic and military future significant for the new Syrian administration. The SDF’s future as a military force is also at stake. Turkey claims the SDF is an extension of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which it classifies as a “terrorist” organisation. Additionally, the fate of thousands of students and employees subject to the administration’s unique laws remains uncertain. The “Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria” established its own laws and governance after taking control of these areas, which were previously held by ISIS, and expanded its reach between 2014 and 2019. This expansion extended from the northern parts of Hasakah, the cities of Ain al-Arab (Kobani) and Afrin, towards eastern and southern Hasakah, the city centre of Raqqa, and the eastern bank of the Euphrates River in Deir El-Zor, along with its towns. The SDF-administered areas encompass about half the length of the borders with Turkey and Iraq. The border with Iraq stretches more than 460 kilometres from the town of Ain Diwar in the north of Hasakah governorate to Baghouz near al-Bukamal in the eastern Deir El-Zor countryside. The area separating SDF-controlled territory from Turkey spans more than 420 kilometres, from Ain Diwar to the outskirts of Manbij in the Aleppo countryside, excluding the 130 kilometres controlled by Turkish-backed “Syrian National Army” factions, following Turkey’s “Operation Peace Spring” in 2019. The region is therefore of political and geographical significance, linked to sensitive issues with Syria’s neighbours, including the pursuit of ISIS cells by Iraq and Turkey’s concerns about the SDF’s presence on its southern borders. The presence of over 15 American military bases in the region further complicates the situation. The area also houses the “Al-Hol” and “Roj” camps, which hold more than 10,000 people from ISIS families, as well as numerous prisons and detention centres, including the “Al-Sina” and “Ghuwairan” prisons in Hasakah. There are approximately 13,000 detainees accused of ISIS affiliation, including at least 8,000 foreigners from more than 50 nationalities. The visits of Turkish intelligence head, Ibrahim Kalin, and his Iraqi counterpart, Hamid Al-Shatri, to Damascus shortly after the new Syrian administration took office, underscore the importance of the SDF file to the national security of all three countries. These visits indicated a desire to address the issues without posing a threat to regional and international security. These developments explain the efforts by the United States and France to reach a consensus that would allow Damascus to impose its authority on the region while respecting Kurdish specificities and preventing ISIS cells from reorganising. The United States has also engaged in discussions with the new Syrian administration to understand their vision for the country after the ousting of former President Bashar al-Assad, particularly in light of the US’s prior experience with the Taliban in Afghanistan. Last week, three senior US diplomats met in Damascus with leaders of Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS), the group that led the armed opposition factions to topple the Assad regime, a group the United States designates as a “terrorist organisation”. The meeting was aimed at persuading them to adopt a “comprehensive and moderate” form of governance in Syria. According to a report in The New York Times , US officials believe this is the best option to prevent further violence and chaos in Syria. They believe the new leadership in Syria is so far “saying the right things”. Barbara Leaf, a senior US State Department official for Middle Eastern affairs, said that Ahmed al-Shar’a, the leader of HTS, “appeared pragmatic” when she met him in Damascus. She added that Al-Sharaa, also known as Abu Muhammad Al-Golani, made “moderate statements” on a range of issues, including the rights of women and minorities, and gave assurances that “terrorist groups will not operate inside Syria.” However, US officials remain cautious about Al-Sharaa. They fear that his statements are only an attempt to “gain international support” as part of his plans to consolidate his power, and potentially impose “strict rule,” similar to the Taliban movement in Afghanistan in 2021, The New York Times reports. US officials remember their attempts in 2021 to broker a power-sharing agreement with the Taliban as US forces prepared to leave Afghanistan. They also believed the Taliban might be willing to make compromises such as allowing girls to attend schools to win international recognition. However, after the departure of the last US troops, Taliban fighters seized power, quickly imposing restrictions on daily life and barring women from most public places. Senior officials in the Biden administration have not forgotten these events.