jilibet 90

NoneNoneVICTORIA — British Columbia Premier David Eby says 25-per-cent U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods would be "devastating" for the province's lumber and forestry industries. He made the comment ahead of a meeting with fellow first ministers and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Eby was scheduled to participate in the virtual meeting on Wednesday to discuss U.S. president-elect Donald Trump's threat to impose the tariffs unless Canada and Mexico stop illegal border crossings and prevent illicit drugs from entering the United States. Eby said the lumber and forestry sectors are already strained by a recent increase in duties amid the ongoing U.S.-Canada dispute over softwood lumber. He said after the first meeting of his new cabinet in Victoria that the tariffs are "unjustified," and they would hurt Americans as much as they would Canadians. The premier said B.C. is a source of natural gas, wood products, minerals and other products that U.S. businesses depend on, and the tariff would hinder jobs and opportunities in the province while making "life more expensive for Americans." Eby and Ottawa have called for a united front dealing with Trump's tariff plan, which he announced on social media on Monday. Eby said B.C. officials had repeatedly raised concerns with Ottawa over organized crime and illicit drugs, such as fentanyl, in relation to border security. "It's a priority for us. It has been for a while, we've written to Ottawa about it. Doesn't justify the tariffs, but it does mean that we can talk about those issues as well." Eby said Trump's proposed tariff "doesn't make economic sense," and the measure is not necessary to address issues at the border. The premier said he believes B.C. has a strong case to make for the tariff being "badly placed" if Trump's priority is to reduce costs for Americans. "I think the premiers are unified," Eby said. "There are 13 of us plus the prime minister. It's a big group of people with different political perspectives, but on this issue of ensuring that we're protecting the people in our country from these unjustified tariffs, I believe we're completely in line on that question." This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 27, 2024. The Canadian Pressjilibet 90 。

Jharkhand Assembly Elections: CSDS-Lokniti SurveySkip Bayless Questions LeBron James Announcement from the Lakers

Wales shatter Girls in Green Euro 2025 dreams in Dublin

After Trump’s win, Black women are rethinking their role as America’s reliable political organizersMan City 3 Feyenoord 3: Pep Guardiola’s nightmare run goes on as hosts throw away THREE-GOAL lead to draw

San Francisco immigrants, advocates prepare for Trump’s return

NEW YORK (AP) — The leaders of Kamala Harris' presidential campaign insist they simply didn't have enough time to execute a winning strategy against Donald Trump, pointing to “ferocious" political headwinds that were ultimately too much to overcome in the 107-day period after President Joe Biden stepped aside. Read this article for free: Already have an account? To continue reading, please subscribe: * NEW YORK (AP) — The leaders of Kamala Harris' presidential campaign insist they simply didn't have enough time to execute a winning strategy against Donald Trump, pointing to “ferocious" political headwinds that were ultimately too much to overcome in the 107-day period after President Joe Biden stepped aside. Read unlimited articles for free today: Already have an account? NEW YORK (AP) — The leaders of Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign insist they simply didn’t have enough time to execute a winning strategy against Donald Trump, pointing to “ferocious” political headwinds that were ultimately too much to overcome in the 107-day period after President Joe Biden stepped aside. Harris’ leadership team, speaking on the “Pod Save America” podcast that aired on Tuesday, defended strategic decisions over the campaign’s closing days, some of which have faced scrutiny in the weeks since Trump’s decisive victory. Specifically, they defended Harris’ outreach to Republican voters, her unwillingness to distance herself from Biden, her silence on Trump’s attacks on her transgender policies and her inability to schedule an interview with popular podcaster Joe Rogan. “In a 107-day race, it is very difficult to do all the things you would normally do in a year and a half, two years,” said Harris campaign senior adviser Jen O’Malley Dillon. David Plouffe, another senior adviser, added, “There was a price to be paid for the short campaign.” The pointed reflections on Harris’ loss came just before she was scheduled to host a conference call with supporters as the party begins a painful process of self-examination. Trump won every swing state and made gains among key voting groups traditionally aligned with Democrats — young voters and voters of color, among them. Harris’ team did not question the legitimacy of Trump’s victory. “We lost,” O’Malley Dillon said. But none of the Harris’ advisers acknowledged any mistakes during the wide-ranging podcast interview hosted by former Democratic operatives. Instead, they indicated that Harris had few options given the compressed timeframe and the broad anti-incumbent headwinds that have challenged elected officials across the world. They also gave Trump’s team some credit. They specifically pointed to Trump’s closing attack ad, which highlighted Harris’ support for taxpayer-funded sex reassignment surgeries for transgender prisoners. “Obviously, it was a very effective ad at the end,” said Harris deputy campaign manager Quentin Fulks. “I think that it made her seem out of touch.” The campaign tested several potential response ads but, in the end, decided it was best to avoid a specific rebuttal. “There’s no easy answers to this,” O’Malley Dillon said. Plouffe said he thought the Trump attack ad against “Bidenomics” was even more effective, but he acknowledged that the transgender attacks were not helpful. “She was on tape,” he said. “Surgery for trans people who want to transition in prison was part of the Biden-Harris platform in 2020. It was part of what the administration did, right?” And while the campaign has faced lingering questions about its media strategy, Harris’ team said she actually wanted to participate in a podcast with Rogan, who is among the world’s most popular podcasters and ultimately endorsed Trump. Stephanie Cutter, another Harris senior adviser, said the campaign wasn’t able to “find a date” to make it work. “We had discussions with Joe Rogan’s team. They were great. They wanted us to come on. We wanted to come on,” she said. “Will she do it sometime in the future? Maybe. Who knows. But it didn’t ultimately impact the outcome one way or the other.” Winnipeg Jets Game Days On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop. Plouffe noted that the campaign offered to do the Rogan podcast on the road in Austin, Texas. Trump ultimately did his interview with Rogan in the podcaster’s studio. Harris’ campaign brass also defended her decision to court moderate Republicans in the campaign’s closing days. The decision has drawn ire from some progressives, who believe Harris should have worked harder to turn out more traditional Democratic voters. “This political environment sucked, OK? We were dealing with ferocious headwinds,” Plouffe said. “So we had a complicated puzzle to put together here in terms of the voters.” He acknowledged some “drift” toward Trump among non-college-educated voters, particularly voters of color, which made Harris’ outreach to moderate voters even more important. “Yes, of course you have to maximize your turnout and your vote share amongst liberal voters if you’re a Democrat. That was a huge focus,” he said. He added, “You’ve got to couple that with dominating in the middle. Not just winning it a little. We have to dominate the moderate vote.” Advertisement AdvertisementU.S. District Court Upholds Validity of CINVANTI® PatentsWho Is Floyd Mayweather’s Girlfriend? Gallienne Nabila’s Job & Relationship History By Netizens are eager to know who is and their relationship history. Dubbed as one of the greatest boxers of all time, Mayweather Jr. is no stranger to the spotlight. Over the years of his illustrious career, fans have always been eager to get a peek into his personal life. Here’s everything we know about Floyd Mayweather’s girlfriend, their relationship timeline, and more. Who is Floyd Mayweather dating? Mayweather has been romantically linked with several women over the years. Albeit, he is known to keep his private life away from the public eye. Various reports have concluded that the boxing legend is currently seeing Nabila and they have been dating on and off for a while. Moreover, the two are often seen together on public outings and vacations. What is Gallienne Nabila’s job? According to her profile, Galliene Nabila is currently signed under the renowned Wilhelmina Models in Los Angeles. She has also previously worked under Elite Model Management. Nabila has shot for several notable brands including Quay, Anastasia Beverly Hills, and Fashion Nova. Besides her career as a model, she is also an aspiring actress. In 2023, Nabila founded her charity organization called Gallienne’s Girls. The nonprofit aims to support young women to discover their passion and reach their goals. In the she shared to announce the launch of Gallienne’s Girls, Nabila wrote, “I’m excited to announce the launch of Gallienne’s Girls, my nonprofit organization that is dedicated to inspire and uplift young girls to be confident and pursue their passions with determination.” Additionally, Galliene Nabila has forayed into fashion design. In 2023, she launched her bathing suit line in collaboration with Nalia Swim. Floyd Mayweather and Gallienne Nabila’s relationship history Although it is unknown when and how Floyd Mayweather and his girlfriend Gallienne Nabila first met, multiple reports suggest that they first got together in 2019. Their relationship has been on and off since then. The boxer was briefly linked with Anna Monroe in 2020. (via ) However, he got back together with Nabila in 2021. Since then, the pair has been spotted attending several public events together, including numerous NBA games. In 2023, Nabila posted a few on her social media sporting a large diamond ring, making netizens believe that an engagement announcement was on the way. However, neither she nor Mayweather have confirmed the speculations. In 2024, the couple was also celebrating Valentine’s Day, indicating that they are going steady as of writing. Namrata is a SEO Content Writer for ComingSoon and an avid reader, with a profound love for movies and anime, especially the works of Hayao Miyazaki. She holds a masters in English literature and has been producing content for over two years. Share article

nCino to Participate in Upcoming Investor ConferencesHeld responsible in part by pundits for President-elect Donald Trump’s victory, immigrants and minorities across the county — and in San Francisco — are now planning for his return to the White House. In the weeks leading up to the presidential election, speculation and analysis about the immigrant and minority votes — particularly in key swing states — ran rampant, with many suggesting they could decide the winner between former president Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. Then, overnight, immigrants and their advocates quickly pivoted to control the fallout from Trump’s victory, given that he has pledged to carry out mass deportations and threatened sanctuary cities like San Francisco. There is a spectrum of opinions and outlooks among leaders in The City on how to react, and how afraid to be, after a second Trump election victory. While a playbook of sorts was drafted and put to use during his first administration, there is concern whether San Francisco has the resources at hand to fend off Trump’s plans, which had already escalated in the tail end of President Joe Biden’s administration. Several immigrant defense organizations told the San Francisco Standard this month that they are under-resourced for the task at hand under Trump, who has indicated on social media that he will deploy the U.S. military to help carry out mass deportations. At the Board of Supervisors meeting on Tuesday, Mayor London Breed — who leaves office in January — trumpeted her administration’s work to improve resources for immigrants. It has expanded the Office of Civic Engagement and Immigrant Affairs and increased immigrant legal defense funding for programs such as CARECEN SF by 40%, Breed said. The City is also working to prepare for threats under Trump’s administration, she added. “My hope is that so much of this rhetoric and the worst does not come to pass,” Breed said. “But either way, I believe in this city as one that will always stand for immigrants and their families, and not give in to fear.” But even if much of Trump’s plans does not come to pass, some advocates say they’re already struggling. “The truth is, our capacity to do removal defense cases has been very, very limited, and I think if you talk to any provider in SF they would say the same thing,” said Adrian​ Tirtanadi​, executive director of Open Door Legal, a nonprofit that aims to offer universal access to legal assistance to those who need it. Open Door Legal estimates it would need more than an additional $2 million in annual funding just to meet the current demand from people currently under deportation proceedings. In San Francisco Immigration Court, people with representation are more than five times more likely to successfully avoid deportation, Tirtanadi said. “If we just let immigrants enforce their rights under current immigration law, you would dramatically slow the number of people being deported,” Tirtanadi said. Economic calculus will come into play. The City will be pushed to expand funding for immigrant-support programs at the same time it attempts to close a massive budget deficit. But immigrant advocates stress that the risk of doing nothing is great, and that the economic consequences of mass deportations would be severe in a city where about one third of the population is foreign-born. There were about 40,000 undocumented immigrants living in San Francisco as of 2021, according to the California Immigrant Data Portal, a project of the University of Southern California’s Equity Research Institute. But that number only represents a fraction of the people who could be affected by mass deportations and other policies proposed by Trump. An additional 26,000 U.S. citizens in San Francisco were living with a person who is undocumented in San Francisco, according to the same data set. There are political factors for San Francisco leaders to consider, as well, and some might suggest The City proceed with caution. San Francisco — by nature of it being the home to House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi and a longtime progressive bastion — already has a target on its back that need not be thrust further into the path of Trump’s agenda. Francisco Ugarte, managing attorney of the Immigration Defense Unit in the San Francisco Public Defender’s Office, remains optimistic about San Francisco’s ability to resist Trump. “We have been through a similar period in history where there were promises of sweeping human-rights abuses and mass deportation,” Ugarte said. “This is going to be different, clearly, but what we learned is that San Francisco stood up, a lot of these local political disputes kind of sifted away, and we unified as a city around attacks on people who were not born in the United States.” He pointed to the unmet goals of the first Trump administration such as the construction of a massive border wall and end of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. “It’s going to be bad, no doubt there's going to be a lot of fear,” Ugarte said. “We don't know what's coming, so it’s hard to prepare — but we will be there.” Under the first Trump administration, San Francisco took quick legal action that successfully blocked Trump from implementing an executive order that would’ve pulled funding from sanctuary cities. Trump has proposed a different path this time, hoping Congress will adopt legislation that would effectively accomplish the same goal as his original executive order. He’s likely to have a more receptive ear to that proposal on Capitol Hill, as Republicans will control both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Already, San Francisco community-based organizations and its Office of Civic Engagement and Immigrant Affairs (OCEIA) are preparing by highlighting resources for immigrants and their families, many of which were launched under the first Trump administration. That includes a rapid-response hotline through which someone can report ICE activity in San Francisco. The network of nonprofits that handle the call line work to vet the report, and can offer legal assistance to anyone detained by immigration officials. “We’re sad that this is happening, but we’re not surprised that Trump was elected and I think this time around, from those lessons the systems can easily be lifted [up],” said Jorge Rivas, executive director of OCEIA. The details and potential legal boundaries of Trump’s plans remain to be seen, which to some extent limits The City’s ability to plan for them. Mayor-elect Daniel Lurie hasn’t gotten specific in comments to the press since he won earlier this month, but has promised to defend the immigrant community. “Right now I’m trying to stay focused on our people and not deal with hypotheticals in [Washington] D.C., but I’m committing to people in San Francisco that I will always, always protect our immigrants,” Lurie told KGO-TV this week. Rivas said his office is already collaborating with service providers throughout San Francisco to assess their needs, and is working to update public-facing information. City departments are having internal conversations about the potential consequences of Trump’s actions, he added. In the meantime, Rivas stressed that San Francisco remains a sanctuary city, and people should still feel comfortable accessing city services — including emergency services like the police department — without fear that doing so could jeopardize their livelihoods. Rivas encouraged people to take advantage of existing resources, including the online Immigrant Support Hub and SF Immigrant Forum resource website. At the same time they’re preparing for Trump, immigrant and minority leaders are tasked by pundits, journalists and political analysts with explaining his victory. Hispanics are the second-largest ethnic group in the country, and the population is growing , according to Census data, placing them under pronounced focus. As the number of Latino voters grows, their votes are up for grabs, as research indicates that they are increasingly unlikely to be rigidly tied to a single party. Repeatedly, Latino voters have indicated in surveys that their top priority is that of the broader population — strengthening the economy and combatting inflation. And Latinos have as much a reason as anyone to factor inflation into their political calculus. Latinos and Black people were disproportionately impacted by inflation that began during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to an analysis released in 2022 by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. On Election Day, Latinos supported Harris in smaller percentages than they did President Joseph Biden in 2020, according to multiple estimates. This quickly spurred headlines and analysis about the rightward shift among Latinos, particularly in states like Florida, which Trump won handily. According to nonpartisan organization UnidosUS, which surveyed Latino voters in the weeks leading up to the election, the reported drift rightward among Latinos has been overstated, and is actually on par with that of the rest of the nation. In the end, UnidosUS and its researchers believe that the Latino vote was not a deciding factor in Trump’s win over Harris. Even if not a single Latino voter cast a ballot in the 2024 election, the result likely would’ve been the same, according to Gary Segura, a UCLA political scientist who worked with UnidosUS to survey voters prior to the election. “Could Latinos have prevented former President Trump from winning North Carolina? Yes, if 97% of them had voted Democratic, something that seems unlikely in any circumstance,” Segura told reporters last week during a call to breakdown polling results hosted by UnidosUS. But that hasn’t stopped the speculation. “What we saw immediately after the election was this wave of people just trying to point fingers at how this happened ... it was pretty much, ‘We need to find a culprit,’” Frankie Miranda, president and CEO of Hispanic Federation, told The Examiner. There are a multitude of nuances to the Latino vote, which is far from monolithic. Central American Latinos, for example, supported Harris by a 40-point margin, while 54% of Cubans backed Trump, according to the UnidosUS poll. There were stark differences in how Latino men and women voted, according to the polling data. Women were far more likely to support Harris, though a slim majority of Latino men also backed the vice president. According to an analysis by The San Francisco Chronicle, counties in California with higher percentages of Latinos were more likely to have a larger shift toward Trump in the 2024 election. But German Cash, the California state director for Hispanic Federation, argued that Californians by and large maintained their strong support for Democrats. “There isn’t a resounding rejection of the policies that have made California what it is now,” Cash said. Regardless of the election outcome, leaders like Miranda are looking ahead and gauging how best to navigate a new Trump administration. “We are a little bit trying to just make sense of this new reality, we are in the process of mapping what is going to be the strategy and what are going to be the specific needs of organizations on the ground,” Miranda said.

Canada didn't live up to its values on immigration in recent years, Carney saysU.S. District Court Upholds Validity of CINVANTI® Patents

West Virginia knocks off No. 3 Gonzaga in overtimeNICOSIA, Cyprus , Dec. 5, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- BC.GAME , a premier cryptocurrency i-Gaming platform, announced its decision to withdraw its license specifically from Curaçao. This move reflects Curaçao's increasingly hostile environment for operators in recent years. Despite ongoing efforts to modernize Curaçao's i-Gaming law, proper legal protection for all operators established in Curaçao is severely lacking, such as its bankruptcy law which dates to 1931 via the " Curaçao Bankruptcy Decree " which can easily be exploited by malicious actors and used against legitimate operators. Therefore, on 5 th December 2024, BC.GAME decided to officially withdraw its Curaçao license. This will in no way affect BC.GAME's wider international operations. Separately from Curaçao, BC.GAME holds gaming licenses in multiple other jurisdictions, and its international operations remain fully compliant with its applicable regulatory obligations. Adapting to industry trends As the global gaming industry faces an increasingly complex regulatory environment, this move by BC.GAME is essential in enhancing and maintaining its operational strategy to ensure continuity and to realign BC.GAME with suitably evolved and robust regulatory frameworks for the benefit of its international operations. Most importantly, it ensures the safety, reliability and security of service for BC.GAME users. Consistency in legal and financial obligations Contrary to recent rumours inaccurately circulated questioning BC.GAME's financial position, BC.GAME further reaffirms to its stakeholders and the public in general that its financial position remains in good health. All BC.GAME's international operations remain unaffected and BC.GAME will continue to fulfil all of its ongoing legal and financial obligations. About BC.GAME BC.GAME is a leading global cryptocurrency i-Gaming platform focused on providing users with a secure and diverse entertainment experience. BC.GAME offers a range of services, including sports betting, and electronic gaming whilst ensuring adequate player protection and an increased focus on preventing gambling addiction. With a strong emphasis on technological innovation and regulatory compliance, BC.GAME continues to expand its presence in international markets in maintaining its reputation of being the leading entertainment provider offering a wide range of gaming services. Logo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2496049/BC_GAME_Logo.jpg

After Trump’s win, Black women are rethinking their role as America’s reliable political organizersNew Oakland Township library board will look to mend fences with Rochester Hill library

West Virginia knocks off No. 3 Gonzaga in overtime