what does 9/9 mean

Apparently, last Sundays' writer (Post Election 2024: Send in the clowns), forgot the rest of the song: Don't bother, they're already here. Michael Willis Green Valley Disclaimer: As submitted to the Arizona Daily Star. Follow these steps to easily submit a letter to the editor or guest opinion to the Arizona Daily Star. Respond: Write a letter to the editor | Write a guest opinion Subscribe to stay connected to Tucson. A subscription helps you access more of the local stories that keep you connected to the community. Catch the latest in Opinion Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!

Democrat Bob Casey concedes to Republican David McCormick in Pennsylvania Senate contestHidalgo leads No. 6 Notre Dame over JuJu Watkins and third-ranked USC 74-61 in big matchup out West

Nine signs of dementia to watch out in older relatives this ChristmasThe 2024 United States (US) presidential election has ushered in a new administration poised to influence both domestic and international economic landscapes. It culminated in a historic victory for Donald Trump, marking his return to the White House for a non-consecutive second term—a feat last achieved by Grover Cleveland in 1892. Trump's campaign was characterised by a firm commitment to stringent trade policies, particularly targeting China, with promises to impose substantial tariffs on Chinese imports. This approach reflects a continuation and intensification of the trade tensions that have defined US-China economic relations in recent years. Regardless of whether Donald Trump or Kamala Harris emerged victorious, the prevailing bipartisan consensus on adopting a stringent stance toward Chinese trade practices is anticipated to have far-reaching implications. This policy direction is expected to affect not only the economies of the US and China but also exert significant influence on global markets. Historically, US administrations have expressed concerns over China's trade policies, citing issues such as intellectual property theft, state subsidies, and trade imbalances. The Trump administration notably escalated these concerns into a full-scale trade war, implementing tariffs on a wide array of Chinese goods. This approach aimed to rectify perceived inequities but resulted in reciprocal tariffs from China, leading to increased costs for consumers and disruptions in global supply chains. The Biden administration, while differing in rhetoric, maintained a firm position on China, emphasising the need for fair trade practices and national security considerations. The US-China trade relationship has been fraught with complexities, significantly impacting global economic dynamics. In 2023, the US imported approximately $450 billion worth of goods from China, while exporting around $150 billion to the Chinese market. This substantial trade deficit has been a focal point of US economic policy, with successive administrations seeking to address perceived imbalances. Trump's proposed tariffs reportedly as high as 60% on Chinese goods are intended to reduce this deficit and bolster domestic manufacturing. However, such measures carry the risk of escalating trade tensions, potentially leading to retaliatory actions from China and further disruptions in global supply chains. The imposition of high tariffs on Chinese products is anticipated to have multifaceted repercussions. For American firms, increased import costs could lead to higher production expenses, which may be passed on to consumers in the form of elevated prices. Industries heavily reliant on Chinese components, such as electronics and automotive manufacturing, are particularly vulnerable. Conversely, Chinese exporters may experience reduced demand from the US market, compelling them to seek alternative markets or adjust their pricing strategies to remain competitive. The interconnectedness of global supply chains means that these disruptions are unlikely to be confined to the US and China alone. The global economy is poised to feel the ripple effects of heightened US-China trade tensions. Countries integrated into the supply chains of either nation may face indirect consequences, including decreased demand for intermediate goods and potential shifts in trade flows. For instance, nations supplying raw materials or components to Chinese manufacturers could see a decline in orders, affecting their export revenues. Emerging economies that rely on global trade for growth may be especially vulnerable, as disruptions in major economies like the US and China can weaken demand for exports and investment. Additionally, the uncertainty engendered by trade disputes may dampen global investment, as firms adopt a cautious stance in response to potential market volatility. Prolonged uncertainty could also lead to a slowdown in innovation and productivity, as companies divert resources to address short-term challenges rather than pursuing long-term growth strategies. In the context of the Indian economy, the ramifications of the US-China trade policies are particularly pertinent. India, as a significant player in the global market, could encounter both challenges and opportunities arising from these developments. On one hand, Indian exporters might benefit from the diversion of US import demand away from China, potentially increasing their market share in sectors such as textiles, pharmaceuticals, and information technology services. For instance, the US import value of textiles from India grew by approximately 20% in 2023, driven partly by efforts to diversify supply chains away from China. On the other hand, disruptions in global supply chains could adversely affect Indian industries reliant on Chinese imports for raw materials and components, leading to increased production costs and potential supply shortages. Furthermore, sectors such as electronics manufacturing, which are heavily reliant on Chinese imports for components, may find it challenging to adjust quickly to these shifts, impacting domestic production and export capacities. The broader implications for India extend beyond trade dynamics. The global economic slowdown that may result from intensifying US-China trade tensions could influence India's export performance and foreign investment inflows. India has consistently sought to position itself as a favorable investment destination, promoting initiatives such as "Make in India" to attract global firms. However, heightened uncertainty and a slowdown in global trade could temper investor enthusiasm. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has cautioned that escalating trade protectionism could impede global economic growth. Projections suggest that widespread tariff increases may reduce global output by up to 1.3% by 2026. Such a contraction would have far-reaching implications, potentially exacerbating economic disparities and undermining efforts toward sustainable development. For developing economies like India, which are striving to enhance growth and reduce poverty, the adverse effects of a global economic slowdown could be particularly pronounced. The IMF’s warning highlights the interconnected nature of modern economies, where policy decisions by major powers like the US and China have cascading effects across the globe. In conclusion, the steadfast US policy of adopting a tough stance against Chinese trade practices, irrespective of the presidential administration, is poised to have significant economic implications. While the intention is to address trade imbalances and protect domestic industries, the potential for unintended consequences is substantial. Both US and Chinese firms may face challenges, and the ripple effects are likely to influence the global economy. As such, it is imperative for policymakers to carefully consider the broader economic impacts of trade policies and strive for solutions that promote fair trade while minimising global economic disruption. This article is authored by Gunwant Singh, scholar, international relations and security studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.

KINGSTON, Jamaica — Member of Parliament (MP) for St Andrew South Western, Dr Angela Brown Burke has expressed mixed feelings regarding the recently declared state of emergency in her constituency. A SOE was declared across the St Andrew South Police Division and sections of St Andrew Central on Thursday following a significant increase in violent criminal activities in Waltham Park Road, Maxfield Avenue, and Waterhouse. READ: SOE declared in St Andrew South; sections of St Andrew Central police divisions In an interview with Observer Online shortly after, Dr Brown Burke shared that while she does not believe in using SOEs as a crime fighting tool, she has to trust the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) to do their job. “I genuinely believe that state of emergency is not an ideal crime fighting tool and that it is only a temporary measure and it is not a lasting solution and so my preference would not be to have that but I’m not a crime fighter and I have to depend on the JCF and those who are in crime fighting to fight the crime that they are facing,” she said. “I can only hope that the temporary release of powers that we will have will be enough for us to be able to move on to a more lasting solution,” Dr Brown Burke continued. The MP anticipates that different communities will react differently to the SOE. “The citizens from parts of Whitfield Town Division, parts of Payneland, parts of Cockburn Pen will welcome it, especially with the kind of murders that they have seen and how frequently that has been and how many that they have seen. They really want to feel like something is happening and they want to see a difference. And so I know that they will sleep easier tonight knowing that,” Dr Brown Burke said. “I know though that persons from the Greenwich Town Division and in particular the Greenwich Town community are going to be asking some questions. It was just a couple weeks ago that we met with the commanding officer from St Andrew South with residents, in particular small business owners, asking for an easing up of the opening hours and that based on the discussion they would have thought that since in their particular area they have not had any of those murders or crimes being committed, I’m sure they would have been looking for some easing up instead of a locking down. “At the end of the day what we do want are individuals feeling safer, to be in their homes, to come home from school, from work, to walk the streets and in more places than not I believe that they will feel safe out of this,” she added. “Again my only hope is that this is not, as it has been so often, just a band-aid that is used. But having cleaned the wound, having placed the band-aid, we need to be thinking at the same time about more permanent fixes to the real deep social problems that we have.”

BOULDER, Colo. (AP) — Nyla Harris had 14 points and Jayda Curry scored 10 of her 14 points in the fourth quarter to help No. 24 Louisville get past Colorado 79-71 on Saturday. The Cardinals led 56-55 after three quarters before pulling away in the fourth by scoring 16 unanswered points, capped by a fast-break layup by Curry, before Colorado made its first field goal of the frame with 2:48 left. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.Thanksgiving dinner costs are down againMetal Display Rack with Wire Hooks and Baskets: A Versatile Solution for Maximizing Product Display Efficiency

BARCELONA, Spain (AP) — Robert Lewandowski converted a first-half penalty kick to become the third player to score 100 goals or more in the Champions League, behind Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi. Lewandowski calmly sent a low shot into the net from the spot in the 10th minute to give Barcelona a 1-0 lead against Brest. He scored his 101st goal from inside the area in second-half stoppage time to seal the Catalan's club 3-0 victory. Lewandowski trails the 129 goals of Messi and the 140 of Ronaldo, according to UEFA. Lewandowski needed 125 games to reach his milestone — two more games than Messi and 12 fewer than Ronaldo, who also scored once in the qualifying round. “I'm delighted, it's a nice number,” Lewandowski said. “In the past I didn’t think I could score more than 100 goals in the Champions League." It was Lewandowski's sixth and seventh Champions League goals this season. It's the ninth season in which the Poland striker has scored six or more goals. The 36-year-old Lewandowski is having a standout campaign, having scored 22 goals for Barcelona in 19 appearances. He is the Spanish league’s scoring leader with 15 goals from 14 matches. ___ AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer The Associated Press

On Football analyzes the biggest topics in the NFL from week to week. For more On Football analysis, head here. ___ Saquon Barkley has become the Shohei Ohtani of the NFL. There’s no better home run hitter playing football right now. Barkley had touchdown runs of 72 and 70 yards for the Philadelphia Eagles in a over the Los Angeles Rams on Sunday night. He now has five runs of 50-plus yards this season and is on pace to break Eric Dickerson’s single-season record of 2,105 yards set in 1984. Barkley’s historic performance against the Rams — his 255 yards set a team record — captivated a national audience and turned him into a fan favorite for the AP NFL MVP award. He’s not the betting favorite, however. Josh Allen has the best odds at plus-150, according to Bet MGM Sportsbook. Two-time MVP Lamar Jackson is next at plus-250 followed by Barkley at plus-400. Running backs have won the award 18 times, including three-time winner Jim Brown, who was the AP’s first NFL MVP in 1957. Quarterbacks have dominated the award, winning it 45 times. Only three players who weren’t QBs or RBs have been MVP. It takes a special season for a non-QB to win it mainly because the offense goes through the signal caller. Quarterbacks handle the ball every offensive snap, run the show and get the credit when things go well and the blame when it doesn’t. Adrian Peterson was the most recent non-QB to win it when he ran for 2,097 yards and 12 touchdowns for the Minnesota Vikings in 2012. Playing for a winning team matters, too. Nine of the past 11 winners played for a No. 1 seed with the other two winners on a No. 2 seed. The Vikings earned the sixth seed when Pederson was MVP. Barkley is a major reason why the Eagles (9-2) are and only trail Detroit (10-1) by one game for the top spot in the conference. Does he have a realistic chance to win the MVP award? Kicker Mark Moseley was the MVP in the strike-shortened 1982 season when he made 20 of 21 field goals and 16 of 19 extra points in nine games for Washington. If voters once selected a kicker, everyone has a chance, especially a game-changer such as Barkley. Defensive tackle Alan Page was the MVP in 1971 and linebacker Lawrence Taylor won it in 1986. Running back Christian McCaffrey finished third in voting last year and wide receiver Justin Jefferson placed fifth in 2022. The Offensive Player of the Year award and Defensive Player of the Year award recognize the best all-around players on both sides of the ball, allowing voters to recognize non-QBs if they choose. Wide receivers and running backs have won the AP OPOY award seven times over the past 11 seasons. McCaffrey was the 2023 winner. The AP’s new voting format introduced in 2022 also gives non-QBs a better opportunity to get MVP recognition. Voter submit their top five picks for each award, with a weighted point system. Previously, voters made one choice for each award. A nationwide panel of 50 media members who regularly cover the league vote for MVP and seven other awards. The awards are based on regular-season performance. Clinching scenarios The Chiefs (10-1) and Bills (9-2) already are in position to lock up postseason berths right after Thanksgiving. Kansas City clinches a playoff berth with a win over Las Vegas on Black Friday and a loss by Miami on Thursday night, or a win plus a loss by Denver on Monday night. Buffalo can wrap up a fifth straight AFC East title with a victory over San Francisco on Sunday and a loss by the Dolphins. Status quo in Dallas? It’s not a given that the Dallas Cowboys will be looking for a new head coach after this season. Owner Jerry Jones said Tuesday on local radio that Mike McCarthy could end up getting a contract extension. “I don’t think that’s crazy at all. This is a Super Bowl-winning coach. Mike McCarthy has been there and done that. He has great ideas. We got a lot of football left,” Jones said. McCarthy led the Cowboys (4-7) to three straight 12-win seasons, but they went 1-3 in the playoffs and haven’t reached the NFC championship game since winning the Super Bowl 29 years ago. Injuries have contributed to the team’s struggles this season, but Dallas was just 3-5 before Dak Prescott was lost for the rest of the season. The Cowboys upset Washington last week and their next four games are against teams that currently have losing records. If they somehow end up 9-8 or even 8-9, Jones could make a case for keeping McCarthy. ___ AP NFL:

None

Indian diaspora in the UK immersed in the divine ambrosia of devotion

NoFloods product has potential to prevent flood problems on roads, says Nanta

Lululemon Athletica earnings beat by $0.16, revenue topped estimates