piggy slots game

piggy slots game Methode Electronics to Announce Second Quarter Fiscal 2025 Results on Thursday, December 5, 2024Imagine being told you can’t play your favorite game just because of what you’re wearing. Sounds weird, right? That’s exactly what happened to Magnus Carlsen, one of the world’s best chess players, at a big tournament in New York. Here’s the story: Magnus showed up wearing jeans, which weren’t allowed. The chess organization, FIDE, has a rule that players must wear “dress pants.” When they told him to change, Magnus decided to quit the tournament instead! He’s a five-time champion, so you’d think they’d let it slide. But FIDE stuck to the rules, even making another top player, Ian Nepomniachtchi, change his shoes earlier in the competition. Now, Magnus might not be too upset about this. People say he has other plans and didn’t really mind leaving the tournament. But still, breaking a rule and acting like it’s okay just because you’re famous isn’t exactly fair. Rules are rules, and FIDE has the right to enforce them for everyone equally. That said, let’s talk about dress codes. Are they really necessary? Think about it: does wearing jeans instead of dress pants make chess any less serious? Probably not. Other sports have faced similar issues. In 2005, the NBA tried forcing basketball players to wear suits for team events. They thought it would make the players look more professional, but fans didn’t like it. Fun fact: sneakers, like Nike’s Air Jordans, are a huge part of basketball culture, making billions of dollars every year! Even outside sports, dress codes can be silly. One big Indian company once forced all its male employees to wear ties, but they eventually dropped the rule because too many people were quitting! Wearing something uncomfortable just for appearances doesn’t make much sense, does it? In the end, while Magnus should have followed the rules, maybe it’s time for FIDE and other organizations to rethink these dress codes. After all, what you wear doesn’t change how talented or serious you are about what you do. Comfort and fairness should matter more than outdated ideas about “looking professional.”

New research suggests that adopting a low-fat vegan diet is significantly cheaper than both a standard American diet and a Mediterranean diet . Read more: Mediterranean Diet Vs Plant-Based: Which Is Best? The research was conducted by the Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine (PCRM) and published in the latest issue of the scientific journal Jama Network Open . PCRM carried out a secondary analysis of a 2019 randomized clinical trial. This analysis found that total food costs were 19 percent lower on a vegan diet than on a standard American diet (SAD) featuring animal products and refined ingredients. Furthermore, costs were 25 percent lower when compared to a Mediterranean diet. The savings were mostly associated with eschewing traditional meat, which offset the additional outgoings for vegetables and plant-based proteins. Overall, the analysis suggests that people following a SAD diet could save more than $650 per year by going vegan, while those following a Mediterranean diet could save over $870. Read more: National Dietary Guides Should Be Based On Healthy Plant-Based Diet, Says Study Vegan diets cheaper and more sustainable This latest analysis is preceded by PCRM research from 2023 that found low-fat vegan diets were around 16 percent less expensive than diets including meat, dairy, and egg. “As the cost of groceries remains stubbornly high, consumers should swap the meat and dairy products for a low-fat vegan diet based on fruits, vegetables, grains, and beans,” said Hana Kahleova, the lead author of the new paper and director of clinical research at PCRM, per Technology Networks . “A vegan diet won’t just save money; it could save lives by helping to avoid or improve conditions like obesity, type 2 diabetes, and heart disease.” A separate report by Bryant Research and Plant-Based Universities from October found that Universities could save half a million pounds and cut 84 percent of greenhouse gas emissions from food by switching to entirely plant-based catering. Plant-Based Universities campaigner Agnes Sales called such a move “common sense.” Read more: Plant-Based Milk And Meat Are Now Mainstream In Europe, Report Finds

None

Limited again, 49ers QB Brock Purdy still fighting sore shoulderNone

Lebanon has been facing an energy crisis for several years, with regular blackouts leading to an overreliance on diesel generators for power. This is largely due to years of misspending public funds and underinvestment in the country’s energy infrastructure. Now, there are concerns that Lebanon’s ongoing conflict with neighbouring Israel could make it even more difficult to tackle the worsening energy and economic crises. Lebanon has been facing a severe economic crisis for the last five years, owing largely to political instability, a financial crisis, and the Covid-19 pandemic. Unemployment rates have risen sharply, and the banking sector has been hit hard, with many losing confidence in the country’s financial institutions. Infrastructure development has lagged in response, primarily due to financing shortages. This has exacerbated the country’s energy crisis, with little public finance available for the state-owned electric company Électricité du Liban (EDL) to improve Lebanon’s energy system and limited interest from private and foreign investors due to ongoing economic and geopolitical instability. In the summer of 2021, following years of on-and-off blackouts due to severe underinvestment in Lebanon’s ageing energy infrastructure, the country entered an energy crisis when the State became unable to secure the foreign currency needed to purchase fuel. Since then, the ESL has only been able to provide a few hours of electricity per day on average. While the government has long been open to the development of Lebanon’s renewable energy capacity, it continues to rely heavily on fossil fuels for its power. In 2022, of Lebanon’s electricity generation, followed by solar PV (29 percent) and hydropower (16 percent). The government has introduced diverse energy policies over the last decade and a half to limited success. In 2010, the government the National Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Action, a mechanism to support the financing of green energy projects across the country. In 2023, the government introduced a new decentralised renewable , which simplifies regulatory processes and ensures grid access for decentralised systems. It encourages private sector participation and helps local communities to generate and manage their own energy, thereby reducing reliance on the unstable national grid. The government is now drawing up the second National Renewable Energy Plan (NREAP 2024-2030), which could support the development of a strong green energy sector and grow Lebanon’s renewable energy capacity to contribute 40 percent of electricity consumption by 2030. The government has aimed to diversify Lebanon’s energy mix in recent years to enhance energy security in recent years. To date, the government has signed power purchase agreements for 11 projects with a projected total of 165 MW of PV capacity. Meanwhile, private investment in rooftop solar projects has increased as citizens respond to several years of unstable energy provision, regular power cuts, and rising electricity costs, which have driven many to rely heavily on diesel generators for power. A 2023 report from the NGO Human Rights Watch stated that between November 2021 and January 2022, Lebanese households allocated 44 percent of their monthly income to meet their electricity needs, spending mainly on keeping their generators running. However, private investment in solar energy has risen sharply in the last couple of years, as those with the means are investing in personal solar power systems to provide a more stable flow of electricity – a longer-term solution to the lack of power than generators. The solar sector has expanded significantly, from a capacity of 100 MW in 2016 to around , with little oversight and regulation. This has led to severe energy inequality in Lebanon between those who can afford solar panels and those who cannot. In addition to battling continued economic and energy crises, the Lebanese government must now find a way to support hundreds of thousands of people who have been displaced due to the ongoing conflict with Israel. Between mid-September and mid-November, around because of the conflict. Since the beginning of the conflict, losses suffered by the public water and energy sectors have been estimated at $480 million. The energy sector alone has , due to increased demand from displaced persons, infrastructure damage, and revenue losses. The government and EDL are under pressure to provide economic support and energy to displaced persons under an already overstrained system. The longer the conflict persists, the more likely that the government will be unable to meet even the basic needs of the Lebanese population without external economic intervention. Despite the government’s support for the expansion of Lebanon’s renewable energy capacity, there has been little formal sectoral growth. The country’s solar energy capacity has, instead, grown largely thanks to small-scale private investment in response to the failure of the EDL to provide a stable flow of energy to consumers. Lebanon has faced an economic and energy crisis for five years, with no end in sight. Further, the forced displacement of over a million Lebanese due to the conflict with Israel is likely to exacerbate the crises unless the government can attract funding from foreign actors to support short- and long-term investment in energy capacity growth and distribution. By Felicity Bradstock for Oilprice.com

Yamandu Orsi: Uruguay's New Political Leader Shaping a Modern Left

Anthony Edwards’ leadership had to take another step forward this week for Timberwolves

None