casino slot games

casino slot games Kohl's Corp. stock rises Tuesday, still underperforms marketThe war of words over the Heisman Trophy is on. Days after Colorado head coach Deion Sanders declared the race over, crowning Travis Hunter the award winner, Boise State head coach Spencer Danielson had a different idea. “Absolutely not,” when asked by a reporter during a press conference if the Heisman race was over. While he didn’t want to get into too many details, with the Broncos having one more game to play before Heisman votes are tallied, Danielson took the chance to boost his team’s candidate — running back Ashton Jeanty — and take a shot at Sanders in the process. “Ashton Jeanty is the best football player in the country,” Danielson said. “For me, if you’re one of the best players in the country, you play in the championship game.” After finishing 11-1, Boise State will take on UNLV in the Mountain West title game on Friday night. Colorado, which went 9-3, didn’t play well enough to make the Big 12 championship game, which will feature Arizona State and Iowa State. Danielson’s comments appeared to be a direct crack at Sanders’ words after the Buffaloes’ 52-0 victory over Oklahoma State on Saturday. “I think Travis clinched the Heisman with his performance,” Sanders said. “You’ve never seen it before, he’s the best player in college football. Travis Hunter proved today, and he’s proved every day, that he’s the best player in college football.” Hunter and Jeanty are widely considered the two favorites to win this season’s Heisman. Hunter, a rare wide receiver/cornerback two-way star, has 92 receptions for 1,152 yards and 14 touchdowns on the offensive end with 31 tackles, four interceptions and a forced fumble on defense. Jeanty is having one of the best college seasons from a running back ever, with 2,288 rushing yards and 29 total touchdowns.

Gregg Wallace admits ‘I’m f****d’ as he tells pals he fears MasterChef will sack him after ‘grope’ probe

I'm A Celebrity viewers fuming after Dean McCullough moved to secret luxury camp( MENAFN - Newsroom Panama) You're witnessing a seismic shift in the entertainment industry, driven by technological advancements and evolving consumer preferences. The metaverse is projected to generate up to $5 trillion in value by 2030, with over 50% of live events expected to occur within this immersive digital realm. Data-driven diversity and inclusion initiatives are influencing box office success and consumer engagement. Strategic partnerships and M&A activity highlight the importance of collaboration in adapting to changes in content distribution. Personalization through AI-driven technologies can boost revenues by 15%, while intuitive interfaces promote natural interactions with entertainment. Embrace these trends to stay competitive in the evolving global entertainment landscape. Two key trends are driving the future of entertainment: the rise of the metaverse and the growing demand for immersive experiences. As the metaverse is projected to generate up to $5 trillion in value by 2030, it's clear that this virtual reality landscape will play a significant role in shaping how we consume and interact with content. You can expect over 50% of live events to occur within the metaverse by 2030, signaling a major shift towards digital transformation in the entertainment industry. Content creators and companies investing in metaverse-related technologies will be at the forefront of innovation, redefining how we experience entertainment. The integration of gaming and filmed entertainment will blur the lines between passive and interactive content consumption, creating new opportunities for immersive experiences. With the virtual reality industry expected to reach $22 billion by 2025, it's evident that the demand for immersive entertainment will continue to grow. Embracing these trends will be crucial for staying relevant and competitive in the rapidly evolving entertainment landscape, as the metaverse and immersive experiences become the new norm. Alongside the metaverse and immersive experiences, data-driven diversity and inclusion initiatives are transforming the entertainment industry, including Canadian IPTV . Authentic representation in films significantly impacts box office success, with movies featuring fewer than 11% underrepresented actors underperforming by 20%. Additionally, 64% of consumers report being influenced by diverse advertisements, highlighting the importance of representation in marketing strategies. However, companies face challenges in effectively recording Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) data: Despite these challenges, 59% of executives have increased their investments in DEI initiatives over the past year, reflecting a growing commitment to fostering inclusive environments in the media and entertainment industry. As the industry evolves, data-driven diversity and inclusion will play a crucial role in shaping personalized content and ensuring authentic representation across all platforms, ultimately driving the future of entertainment. Strategic partnerships and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are transforming the entertainment industry as companies adapt to the rapidly evolving content and distribution landscape. In the realm of entertainment, storytelling formats are undergoing a profound transformation, driven by technological advancements and evolving consumer preferences. Modern creators are leveraging mixed reality, participatory storytelling, and immersive theater to engage audiences in unprecedented ways. This shift is evident in: As technology continues to progress, the lines between creator and consumer will blur further, giving rise to even more interactive and personalized forms of storytelling. This evolution will not only reshape the entertainment landscape but also redefine how we connect with narratives and each other. The future of entertainment lies in the seamless integration of diverse formats, fostering deeper engagement and more meaningful experiences for audiences worldwide. Personalization and intuitive interfaces are poised to revolutionize the entertainment landscape, as AI-driven technologies and immersive experiences continue to shape consumer expectations. You'll find that personalization, powered by machine learning, can boost revenues by 15% through tailored customer experiences. Intuitive interfaces, such as gesture and voice recognition, will promote more natural interactions with entertainment, moving beyond traditional controls. As you demand more relatable content, immersive experiences designed with character recognition and emotional responsiveness will enhance your engagement. By 2030, your wearable devices will seamlessly integrate social, work, and entertainment environments, creating a personalized consumption experience. The rise of virtual reality and mixed reality technologies will redefine storytelling, allowing for personalization that enhances your interaction and engagement with narratives. Artificial intelligence will play a crucial role in driving these advancements, enabling entertainment providers to deliver highly customized content and experiences. As personalization and intuitive interfaces become the norm, you can expect a more immersive and engaging entertainment landscape that adapts to your preferences and behaviors, ultimately transforming the way you consume and interact with content in the future. You'll witness a transformation in entertainment, driven by content diversity and personalized experiences. Streaming competition will intensify, while virtual reality and AI redefine audience engagement. Prepare for a future of immersive storytelling and global cultural exchange. You'll witness streaming dominance, immersive experiences, and diverse content driving audience engagement. Virtual reality and cultural exchange will reshape entertainment, while data-driven insights and forward-looking strategies will be essential for success in this evolving landscape. You'll experience immersive entertainment through virtual reality and AI-driven storytelling on streaming platforms. Interactive media and personalized content, powered by advanced technologies, will reshape how you engage with and consume entertainment in the future. Globalization has transformed entertainment through cultural exchange and audience diversity. Streaming platforms now offer regional content, fostering global collaborations. As language barriers diminish, you can access a wealth of international films, shows, and creators like never before. MENAFN24122024000218011062ID1109028674 Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

The murder of the CEO of UnitedHealthcare , America’s largest health insurer, has generated a lot of discourse over the past week and renewed conversation about the state of the U.S. health care system — something that was almost entirely missing from the 2024 campaign. Social media users have actively celebrated the shooting and thirsted over the suspect . In the other direction, New York Times columnist Bret Stephens argued the insurance exec was a “working-class hero,” while blogger Noah Smith asserted that health insurers are simply “middlemen” and not “the main villain of the U.S. health system.” The CEO of UnitedHealth Group (UHC’s parent company) wrote in the Times that the health conglomerate’s purpose is “to build a health care system that works better for everyone.” Sure , man . Yet, CNN offered perhaps the strangest take in one segment this week: Americans are responsible for our health care system staying the way it’s designed today — i.e. based around private health insurance — because they like their insurance plans. On Wednesday, CNN anchor John Berman and Harry Enten, a senior political data reporter, reviewed poll results from Gallup which showed that Americans broadly have negative views about health care coverage in the U.S., believe health care costs are too high, and say the health care system has major problems. Americans, for the most part, have more favorable views of their own health care coverage — which Berman and Enten repeatedly emphasized — though those numbers were not resounding. “We can’t just say Americans hate health care. No, they like their health care,” said Berman. “They just have this notion they don’t like the health care system. I suppose you can hold those two views at once, but it is complicated.” The argument that Americans like their own health insurance plans is a favorite industry talking point. Indeed, as the internet was heralding the UnitedHealthcare CEO’s murder, the health care industry’s primary anti-reform front group was posting on X: “A majority of voters nationwide are satisfied with their current health plans.” (The corollary to this industry talking point is: And that’s why nothing should ever change .) The thing is, people are typically OK with their health insurance plans until they really need to use it — and see their claims denied, get told they can’t receive a necessary treatment, or find themselves paying major out-of-pocket costs. Considering the rest of Berman’s comment, the idea that Americans could like their health care and hate the system is still not necessarily a complicated view, because the U.S. health care system is uniquely expensive and wasteful. America spends far more on health care than other wealthy countries — for exceedingly poor outcomes. Being dissatisfied with the total cost of the health care system — as 79 percent of Americans are, per the Gallup poll — is simply correct. Enten took things a step further: “You wonder why the health care system in this country stays the same,” he said. “It’s because people don’t like health care, in sort of the abstract — but when it comes to their own health care, a lot of Americans actually are pretty gosh darn satisfied with it.” The idea that Americans are responsible for the health care system remaining the way it’s designed is ludicrous. The two have nothing to do with each other. The public doesn’t set policy — and even when Americans believe they are voting for change or for a specific policy platform they were promised, they rarely get it, thanks to entrenched corporate power and rampant corruption. Donald Trump won in 2016 railing against health insurers that “are making a fortune because they have control of the politicians.” His first administration did nothing to address this in office, and instead encouraged more seniors to sign up for privatized Medicare Advantage plans. Joe Biden , meanwhile, campaigned in 2020 on a promise to enact a public health insurance option — and has not even once mentioned that policy idea as president. Instead, Democrats gave more subsidies , i.e. extra money, to health insurers to help more Americans sign up for individual health insurance plans. Related Content Luigi Mangione Wrote Online About a Spine Disorder. Other Patients Say It's Hell Meet the New FBI Boss. He Sued the Old Boss. And Got Laughed Out of Court Kimmel Calls Out Trump's Bumpy Past With 'Time' Magazine's 'Person of the Year' ‘It’ll Be Brutal’: Inside Trump’s Planned War on Leakers and the Press Blaming Americans for the current system remaining in place obscures those who are actually responsible: a collection of massively lucrative businesses that profit from the current arrangement and the many politicians on both sides of the aisle who either dutifully represent their interests or are afraid to take on an industry with deep pockets — or both. Our health care system works phenomenally well for health insurance companies, of course, and for other powerful industries: for instance, pharmaceutical companies that want to be able to keep drug prices far higher in the U.S. than in the rest of the world, or hospital chains that charge private plans much higher prices than Medicare would pay. That’s why lobbies for health insurers, drug companies, and chain hospitals created a front group to oppose reform ideas like Medicare for All , the public option, and efforts to lower the Medicare eligibility age. (That front group is the one trying to tell people on X that Americans actually really like their health coverage and don’t want any meaningful changes.) These lobbying groups each collect tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue each year, from industries that collectively generate tens or hundreds of billions in annual revenue. (To be clear, there are many other lines of business that profit off our health care system’s bloat and administrative waste.) All of the money sloshing around the health care system makes it incredibly difficult to change much, if anything, about it — because it limits any political incentive to try. Powerful health care interests shower politicians with donations, fund front groups that support them , and can spend these politicians into the ground any time, at will, if it becomes necessary. As Democrats negotiated the Affordable Care Act between 2009 and 2010, health insurance lobbyists quietly funneled more than $100 million to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to run a sprawling campaign slamming the legislation and its supporters. The ACA became law, but Democrats ultimately nixed the public option — before promising that idea again in 2020 and immediately dropping it once they won. This year’s election featured little conversation about potential health care reforms. When Trump was asked during a debate to describe his plans for health care, the president-elect only said he had “concepts of a plan” to improve the ACA. It was an embarrassing moment — yet, a Fox News Voter Analysis found the majority of respondents who said they were very concerned about their health care costs were supporting Trump. Now, Team Trump is considering making it even harder for low-income households to access Medicaid coverage — and using the savings to help pay for more tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations. Republicans may also allow the expanded subsidies to expire , which would make it more expensive for many Americans to buy individual coverage. Americans didn’t make our health care system the way it is today — and they certainly didn’t vote for Republicans to make it even worse, if that’s what they end up doing. An immensely powerful health care industry and corrupt political class give Americans no choices in these matters at all.ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Josh Norris broke a tie on a power play with 7:18 left, Leevi Merilainen made 30 saves in his fifth NHL game and the Ottawa Senators beat the Minnesota Wild 3-1 on Sunday night. Ottawa has won seven of its past nine games, while the Wild have lost five of their past seven. The Senators won in Minnesota for the first time since 2016. With starter Linus Ullmark and backup Anton Forsberg out with injuries, the Senators have been relying on Merilainen and Mads Sogaard since before the NHL holiday break. Frederick Gaudreau opened the scoring for Minnesota late in the first period. Ridly Greig tied it early in the second. Claude Giroux added an empty-netter. Senators: A team that finds itself surprisingly in a playoff position after missing the postseason the past six seasons topped a Western Conference contender in Minnesota. Norris has been a big part of the Senators' surge and now ranks second on the team with 14 goals. Wild: A lower-body injury kept Kirill Kaprizov out of his second straight game, but Joel Eriksson Ek returned after missing 11 games with a lower-body injury. The Wild are 17-5-4 with Eriksson Ek in the lineup and 5-6-0 without him. The Wild killed one penalty midway through the third, but Jared Spurgeon went to the box seconds later on a holding call. Norris scored on the power play. The Senators’ nine-game trip continues Thursday at Dallas night. The Wild host Nashville on Tuesday night. AP NHL: https://apnews.com/hub/nhl

State lawmakers return to Concord Wednesday to be sworn in and elect new leaders. Republican Sen. Sharon Carson of Londonderry is all but guaranteed to win election as the next president of the New Hampshire Senate, where Republicans will hold a 16-8 majority in the next session. But who will be the next speaker of the 400-member New Hampshire House is a little more up in the air. Incumbent House Speaker Sherman Packard, a Republican who has represented Londonderry in the legislature since 1990, is seeking a third term leading the House. House Democratic leader Alexis Simpson of Exeter is also running. But Packard also faces a challenger from a fellow Republican: Rep. Kim Rice, of Hudson. Rice is returning to the State House after stepping away from the Legislature in 2022. At the time, Rice held the title of House Speaker Pro Tempore, the third ranking job in the Legislature, which Packard had given her. But Rice’s relationship with Packard, and with Majority Leader Jason Osborne, frayed after she opposed a controversial parental rights bill backed by most Republicans in 2022. After leaving the Legislature, Rice played a prominent role in the presidential campaign of former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley. Rice isn’t commenting on her efforts to win election as speaker, but she and her allies have been reaching out to lawmakers in both parties looking for support. Rice faces an uphill battle, and her fortunes will hinge on whether she can build a bipartisan coalition. That’s been the recipe in the past when Republican-led legislatures have chosen speakers who weren’t the first choice of the Republican caucus. After this year’s elections, Republicans hold a 42-seat advantage in the House. So for Rice, success will require persuading some Republicans to break with Packard and getting House Democrats to back her as a bloc. It could be a tall order: Packard isn’t much of a lightning rod within the House. And it's far from clear if the House still contains many of the kind Republicans Rice needs — moderates game to buck the will of the rest of the caucus — in real numbers. The other votes lawmakers are slated to take Wednesday, for Secretary of State and treasurer, will be far more straightforward. Secretary of State David Scanlan, who has held his job since 2022, is seeking his third term. Treasurer Monica Mezzepelle is also seeking reelection. Both are running unopposed.NEW YORK and LONDON , Dec. 12, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc. (NYSE: PDCC) (the "Company") today announced that it has priced an underwritten public offering of 1,200,000 shares of its 8.00% Series A Preferred Stock Due 2029 (the "Preferred Shares") at a public offering price of $25 per share, which will result in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $28.8 million after payment of underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. The Preferred Shares are rated 'BBB' by Egan-Jones Ratings Company, an independent rating agency. In addition, the Company has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 180,000 Preferred Shares pursuant to the same terms and conditions. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.AP News Summary at 8:02 p.m. EST

Every year, the royals spend their Christmas at Sandringham , a tradition that has been in the family for generations. Among their Christmas traditions is the exchange of joke presents , handed to one another on Christma s Eve, with reported gifts including a leather toilet seat, a "grow your own girlfriend kit", and a spoon with the words "cereal killer" engraved on it. But the hilarious gift exchanges aren't anything new to the royals. Former royal butler Paul Burrell revealed the "rude" stocking fillers the late Princess Diana would buy for her sons, Prince William and Prince Harry . Princess Diana would spend Christmas with her butler and two sons the weekend before so they could be with the rest of the royal family on the actual day, the ex-royal butler revealed. He said: "We had a fun Christmas, but we always had it the weekend before with Harry and William. She knew they had to be with their father on Christmas Day and with their cousins and the Queen. Eventually, when she didn't go to spend Christmas with the royal family, she would have the weekend before with William and Harry." Paul Burrell recalled making stockings with the late Princess for the brothers, sharing that he would be "stockpiling things" while they were at school, tucking them away in Princess Diana's Christmas stocking. He added: "The three of them would disappear into the sitting room and you could hear the squeals and laughter coming out. Of course, Diana was very jokey and she would put rude things in there too to embarrass them. "William had a calendar one year with naked ladies on it just to make him blush and it worked. Lovely things like that happened, and they would have their Christmas." While the Christmas spent between a mother and her two sons sounded very wholesome, the former butler also recalled how the late Princess had "very sad Christmases". He revealed that she "couldn't stand" Christmas at Sandringham, but when she stopped spending the days with the royal family, her Christmases were spent alone, as she would send Paul away saying, "I'll be fine, it's only one day of the year."

Government vows to support digital assetsIndia News Live Today November 23, 2024: War of words between BJP & BJD over great leaders of Odisha