fortune gems technique

fortune gems technique UnitedHealthcare CEO kept a low public profile. Then he was shot to death in New YorkSLAM Technology Market 2024 Size, Share, Growth Report 2032Adam Pemble, AP journalist whose compassionate lens brought stories to life, dies at 52

ST. THOMAS, Virgin Islands (AP) — Javohn Garcia scored 16 points as McNeese beat Illinois State 76-68 on Friday. Garcia also contributed seven rebounds for the Cowboys (3-2). Brandon Murray shot 4 of 10 from the field and 5 for 7 from the line to add 13 points. Sincere Parker shot 4 for 8 (2 for 5 from 3-point range) and 3 of 4 from the free-throw line to finish with 13 points. Ty Pence led the way for the Redbirds (3-2) with 14 points and six rebounds. Malachi Poindexter added 13 points for Illinois State. Logan Wolf had 11 points. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by and data from .Clubs from across the football pyramid are “alarmed” by the lack of consultation on legislation which could “fundamentally affect the future of English football”, West Ham vice-chairwoman Karren Brady has said. The Apprentice star also argued that a lack of clarity from the Government on the ownership test is causing “significant uncertainty” for potential investors. This came as the House of Lords continued its scrutiny of the Football Governance Bill, which seeks to establish an independent regulator for the top five tiers of the men’s game. In the upper chamber, Baroness Brady said: “We are creating legislation which will profoundly affect 160 quite unique institutions, from Premier League clubs through to the National League community clubs, but it is important for everyone to understand that the consultation with these affected businesses by the current Government has been remarkably limited, almost unbelievably so. “Just seven Premier League clubs, I was one of them, was granted a brief half-hour meeting with the Secretary of State over the summer. “And following this cursory engagement, significant decisions were made that could fundamentally affect the future of English football, most notably with the inclusion of parachute payments within the backstop mechanism. “This is particularly concerning given that fundamental issues still remained unresolved, we still lack any clarity on Uefa’s position on state interference, for example, this clearly creates profound uncertainty for clubs competing in or aspiring to European competition, as well as our national teams.” “We don’t know what the ownership test will look like, this causes significant uncertainty for potential investors as to whether they are able to own a club,” she added. Lady Brady continued: “I have spoken to many of my colleagues across all of the football pyramid, we are all alarmed about and puzzled by the lack of discussion on the Bill with ministers. “Would the minister agree that we all want to get the detail of this Bill right? And can she see any downsides to providing meaningful opportunities to hear from all clubs across the football pyramid affected by the legislation?” Prior to this, Tory shadow sports minister Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay had tabled an amendment which he said would allow clubs to “make their views known on this legislation” by including specific competitions on the face of the Bill. Labour frontbencher Baroness Twycross told the upper chamber: “I don’t think the leagues are confused either on which leagues this legislation will apply to.” She added: “This power is both reasonable and the result of evidence-based consultation with all key stakeholders in the industry. “This power ensures that the competitions in scope can be amended in a timely manner and ensures the scope of the regime remains relevant.” The peer later said: “Over the past three years there have been countless opportunities for all affected and interested parties to make representations.” Lady Brady also raised concerns about the financial distribution backstop, which she said is “clearly designed as a mechanism to gain direct access to, and apportionate Premier League revenue, and no-one else’s”. “I might add the backstop will allow the IFR (Independent Football Regulator) to do this even if it was against the Premier League clubs’ will, or even without the clubs’ agreement, even if it was to have a detrimental effect on the clubs and the overall competition it removes revenue from,” she added. The backstop would allow the new IFR to intervene in the distribution of Premier League broadcast revenue down the leagues as a last resort. It could be triggered by the Premier League, English Football League (EFL) or National League to mediate the fair financial distribution of this revenue if they are not able to come to an agreement. Conservative peers later raised concerns over the cost implications to clubs of establishing the regulator, although they faced claims of “filibustering” – wasting time by making overlong speeches in a bid to delay progress. Watching opposition benches blatantly filibustering to destroy the Football Governance Bill is nothing short of sporting vandalism.Football is broken. Clubs are struggling. Now those seats have been lost, do they no longer care about likes of Reading or Southend? @FairGameUK — Niall Couper (@NiallCouper) December 4, 2024 Labour peer Lord Watson of Invergowrie questioned why Lord Parkinson was showing “confected outrage” at the Bill when the former culture minister would have been defending a similar proposal had the Tories remained in power. Lord Parkinson, in his reply, said: “We want to see this regulator established, we want to see it doing its work and doing so effectively, but we also see before us a Bill that is different because of the election that was called and the result that happened, and we’re interrogating particularly closely the changes that the Government have made to the Bill – of which there are many. “And we have more concerns on these benches than we did before the election from my colleagues behind me about the way we do it.” The Tory peer pointed to Labour frontbenchers fulfilling their duties to “properly scrutinise” then-government legislation when they were on the opposition benches. Lady Twycross, in an intervention, said: “While I agree that (Lord Parkinson) is correct that I would scrutinise legislation when I was sitting on those (opposition) benches, I have never sought to filibuster a Bill to which my party had committed, which my party had laid before Parliament, and intended to filibuster it to the point of getting us stuck in treacle.” Lord Parkinson replied: “That is not what we’re doing.” Niall Couper, chief executive of the campaign group Fair Game, wrote on social media site X: “Watching opposition benches blatantly filibustering to destroy the Football Governance Bill is nothing short of sporting vandalism.”Topline The controversy over actor and director Justin Baldoni’s alleged harassment of actress Blake Lively escalated Tuesday, as Baldoni’s former publicist Jennifer Jones sued Baldoni and his current press representatives, alleging a smear campaign was orchestrated against Jones as her former colleagues allegedly schemed on their “no-holds-barred” campaign against Lively. Key Facts What To Watch For Jones’ lawsuit requests a jury trial and an unspecified amount in damages. The complaint accuses Abel, Baldoni and Wayfarer of breach of contract, as well as all the parties for “tortious interference with contract,” arguing Abel’s actions led to Baldoni terminating his contract with Jonesworks and vice versa. The lawsuit also accuses Abel and 10 unnamed male defendants of defamation, after they allegedly created websites designed to harm Jones’ reputation with false claims, and planted negative stories about her in the press. Abel also made false claims about Jones to other Jonesworks employees that led to them leaving the PR firm, the lawsuit alleges. Lively’s complaint has also formally not yet been filed in court; the complaint was filed with the California Civil Rights Department, which still has to issue a “right to sue” notice in order for the complaint to be filed in state court. It’s unclear how long that process could take and when any lawsuit would be formally brought. What We Don’t Know If Baldoni or Abel could bring their own lawsuit against Jones. In a statement quoted by The Hollywood Reporter, Freedman took aim at Lively’s legal complaint including text message screenshots from Abel and Baldoni, claiming, “Jonesworks utilized a lawyer and security guard to take possession of Wayfarers confidential information through confiscation of Jen Abel’s phone.” “We are continuing to investigate the use of that confidential information but demands are being made to Stephanie Jones and [Lively’s publicist] What Did Publicists’ Text Messages Say? According to Jones’ lawsuit, Abel and Nathan’s alleged efforts against Jones and on Baldoni’s behalf were financially motivated and took place despite the fact that both women allegedly did not care for Baldoni himself. The lawsuit quotes text messages between Abel and Nathan in which they criticized the actor and director, with Abel saying Baldoni is “so pompous” and “so unlikeable and unrealistic as a leading man.” “You’re not that important and nobody gives a s–t how hard your life is,” Abel said about Baldoni in a January text to Nathan, criticizing the actor going to a “men’s retreat” and taking off during the summer because he claimed to be “overworked.” “He needs to be humbled,” she added. “When this movie flops, he’s going to try to blame every person around him for it.” The text messages also detail the defendants’ alleged plan to harm Jones, with Abel telling Nathan she was “going to war” against the Jonesworks leader and Nathan reporting she spoke to Baldoni and told him to leave Jonesworks and go to Abel’s new company. When Abel and Nathan were allegedly planting negative stories about Jones with an Insider journalist who was writing about Jones and the Baldoni controversy, Nathan jokingly suggested Abel should tell Jones about their plan and alleged they were smearing Jones as revenge. “Are you aware there is a KILL STORY dropping this week on you and if you hadn’t of blown us up we would not be in such a bad place,” Nathan jokingly said Abel should tell Jones. Chief Critic Abel denied allegations of orchestrating a smear campaign against Lively on Facebook after the actress’ complaint was published, writing , “No negative press was ever facilitated, no social combat plan ... we didn’t have to implement anything because the internet was doing the work for us.” Abel claimed Lively’s team “had been planting horrible stories about [Baldoni] as a ‘fail safe’” if he didn’t “comply” with Lively’s demands for the film’s publicity campaign, and said she decided to stand by Baldoni, whom she said “had no incidents of negative treatment of others, and who had a wonderful community and team at wayfarer [sic] who all held the same moral fortitude and lived their life accordingly.” In an email Abel forwarded to Forbes Tuesday, Abel appeared to tell Jones she was “mov[ing] forward with my resignation,” noting that her decision to resign took place under “unforeseen circumstances.” (That email is dated as being sent July 26, prior to text messages Abel and Jones allegedly exchanged in August on Abel’s work phone about Abel leaving Jonesworks, and before Jones alleges she fired Abel in August.) Freedman has denounced Lively’s claims as “completely false, outrageous and intentionally salacious with an intent to hurt” Baldoni, also claiming Wayfarer “did nothing proactive nor retaliated” in terms of a PR campaign against Lively. Key Background Lively’s complaint against Baldoni alleges Lively and other cast and crew on “It Ends With Us” were subject to “invasive, unwelcome, unprofessional and sexually inappropriate behavior” from Baldoni and Wayfarer executive Jamey Heath, detailing alleged instances like Baldoni failing to implement industry protocols when filming intimate scenes, pressuring Lively to reveal details about her “intimate life” and making inappropriate comments about women working on the film. The complaint was made public Friday after allegations of drama between the actress and Baldoni gained attention when “It Ends With Us” was released over the summer. Fans pointed out on social media that Lively and Baldoni didn’t appear together during the film’s press tour and anonymous sources suggested there had been a “fracture” during the film’s post-production, though no specific allegations were made. Baldoni hired Nathan’s crisis PR firm amid the controversy, which ramped up speculation further, and said at the time there is “always friction that happens when you make a movie like this,” but that friction “creates the beautiful art.” Lively also faced backlash during her promotion of the film, as fans criticized her for downplaying and being overly dismissive of domestic violence, a key theme in the film. How Did Blake Lively And Jennifer Jones Get Justin Baldoni And His Publicists’ Text Messages? One source of interest following Lively’s legal complaint becoming public is how the actress and her lawyers’ were able to obtain private text messages between Baldoni and his press representatives, some of which were the same as those included in Jones’ lawsuit. Such messages would typically only be turned over after a lawsuit is filed, as part of the evidence-gathering “discovery” process. Lively’s lawyers noted after the complaint was filed they issued a subpoena to Jonesworks for the text messages, and Jones’ animus against Baldoni and Abel suggests why the PR firm quickly turned over the data. In Jones’ lawsuit, her lawyers note Abel’s text messages were extracted from her company work phone that Abel “voluntarily returned” to Jonesworks after she was terminated and allege they were not altered in any way. Further Reading

In no ‘rush’ to hire Tony White replacement, Matt Rhule wants to keep 3-3-5 defensive schemeLawyer says ex-Temple basketball standout Hysier Miller met with NCAA for hours amid gambling probe

WASHINGTON (AP) — Former President Bill Clinton was discharged from a Washington hospital on Tuesday and will be home for Christmas after he was admitted the day before with a fever . Clinton is being treated for the flu, Angel Urena, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, said in a statement about his release. “He and his family are deeply grateful for the exceptional care provided by the team at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and are touched by the kind messages and well wishes he received,” Urena said. “He sends his warmest wishes for a happy and healthy holiday season to all,” Urena said. The 78-year-old Democrat was hospitalized on Monday afternoon for testing and observation. Clinton served two terms as president from January 1993 until January 2001. He addressed the Democratic National Convention in Chicago this summer, and campaigned in the fall for Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris , who lost the election to Republican Donald Trump in November. Clinton recently published his newest book, “Citizen,” a memoir about his life after the White House and the role of philanthropy in it.Iran's government on Tuesday said it had lifted a ban on access to WhatsApp and Google Play after more than two years, the official IRNA news agency reported. The report said the country’s Supreme Council of Cyber Space made the decision in a meeting led by reformist President Masoud Pezeshkian, who has vowed to remove restrictions on social media. Iran’s telecommunication minister Sattar Heshemi in a post on X called the decision a “first step” in removing restrictions and said “the path will continue" — indicating the possibility of unblocking other services. Many people reached by The Associated Press across the capital, Tehran , and other cities said they had access to the services on computers but not yet on mobile phones. WhatsApp has been the third most popular messaging platform in Iran after Instagram and Telegram. The ban on WhatsApp and Google Play was put in place in 2022 during mass protests against the government over the death of a woman held by the country’s morality police for allegedly violating the strictly enforced dress code. The protests calmed in 2023 after a crackdown by police and security forces that led to the death of hundreds of people and the imprisonment of thousands. Iran has blocked access to various social media platforms over the years but many people in the country use proxies and VPNs to access them.

ORNL's Breakthrough: Lightning-Resistant Technology Shields Turbines and AircraftSteve Sarkisian's Comments On Quinn Ewers Sunday Leaves Texas Fans in Disbelief

(Reuters) - Intel will have a CEO with manufacturing expertise as well as experience in the product side of the business, interim co-CEO David Zinsner said at the UBS technology conference on Wednesday. Reuters reported on Tuesday that Intel has started evaluating a handful of outsiders including former board member Lip-Bu Tan to take the reins of the struggling chipmaker. Intel's "core strategy remains intact", Zinsner said at the conference, two days after the struggling U.S. chipmaker announced the resignation of CEO Pat Gelsinger following impatience with the pace of a costly turnaround. The company also requires a "significant cultural change" to become a successful foundry player as well as in the semiconductor business, Intel's head of foundry manufacturing and supply chain Naga Chandrasekaran said. (Reporting by Zaheer Kachwala in Bengaluru; Editing by Shounak Dasgupta)TASK inks pact with corporates to skill 1 lakh youth

Football clubs ‘alarmed’ by lack of consultation on regulator – Karren Brady

The Pittsburgh Steelers' offense was dormant until the fourth quarter of their win over the Cleveland Browns. Until they scored a touchdown in the fourth quarter, it had been seven quarters since the Steelers scored a touchdown. For the team, that is just about rock bottom, even if they sustained drives and have continued to sustain drives at a much higher clip this year than last season. The last time that Pittsburgh did not score a touchdown for over seven quarters was in 2018 and 2019 to round out that season. Between the end of their 2018 season and the start of their 2019 season, it took them over six quarters to get the ball into the end zone. During that stretch, Matt McCrane and Chris Boswell hit field goals. Pittsburgh would take until the next week to scratch that trend against the Seattle Seahawks. The Steelers waited over 100 minutes before scoring two touchdowns in just over a minute of game time in the fourth quarter against the Browns. They will have to hope that sparks them to wins, especially as the schedule gets even more daunting throughout the rest of the season. BETTING: Check out our guide to the best PA sportsbooks , where our team of sports betting experts has reviewed the experience, payout speed, parlay options and quality of odds for multiple sportsbooks. More Pittsburgh Steelers News NFL admits referees made correct call on controversial ruling in Steelers' loss to Browns Browns social media account takes shot at T.J. Watt after Steelers loss Pittsburgh Steelers' Justin Fields package has cloudy future in offense Super Bowl Champion rips Steelers’ Justin Fields package: ‘I don’t like it’ Former Pittsburgh Steelers first-round pick gets revenge in Browns win

Debenhams sell-out long-sleeved leopard print dress is back in stock

Adam Pemble, AP journalist whose compassionate lens brought stories to life, dies at 52

Missouri stuns top-ranked Kansas in 76-67 upsetPresident-elect Donald Trump is trying to get the Georgia election interference case against him dismissed, asserting that the state's courts will not have jurisdiction over him once he returns to the White House next month. The Georgia case against Trump and others is mostly on hold pending a pretrial appeal of an order allowing prosecutor Fani Willis to remain on the case despite what defense attorneys say is a conflict of interest. Trump's attorneys on Wednesday filed a notice with the Georgia Court of Appeals saying a sitting president is “completely immune from indictment or any criminal process, state or federal.” The filing asks the appeals court to consider before he becomes president next month whether it has jurisdiction to continue to hear the case. It says the court should conclude that it and the trial court lack jurisdiction “as the continued indictment and prosecution of President Trump by the State of Georgia are unconstitutional.” Trump's lawyers ask that the appeals court dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction and instruct the trial court to immediately dismiss the indictment against him. RELATED STORY | American foreign policy is flowing through Mar-a-Lago as Trump prepares for White House return Also Wednesday, former Trump campaign lawyer Kenneth Chesebro, who pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge in the case, asked the trial court judge to invalidate that plea. Chesebro was one of four people to plead guilty in the case in the months following the indictment. Representatives for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis declined to comment on Trump's and Chesebro's requests. The Georgia case, which originally included 19 defendants and dozens of charges, was the most sprawling of four criminal cases against the once-and-future president. U.S. Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith last week told judges he was withdrawing both federal cases against Trump, citing longstanding Justice Department policy that shields a president from indictment while in office. One of those cases charged him with hoarding classified documents at his Florida estate. The other accused him of scheming to overturn the 2020 presidential election he lost. Trump on Monday asked a Manhattan judge to throw out his conviction in his hush money case , saying that continuing to pursue it would present unconstitutional “disruptions to the institution of the Presidency.“ The New York case was the only one of Trump’s four criminal indictments to go to trial, resulting in a historic verdict that made him the first former president to be convicted of a crime. In the Georgia case, Trump and some of the other remaining defendants, who have pleaded not guilty, were already seeking to have Willis removed from the prosecution or to have the indictment dismissed. They cited a romantic relationship she had with Nathan Wade , a special prosecutor she appointed to lead the case. Willis and Wade have acknowledged that they had a relationship but have said it began after he was hired and ended before the indictment against Trump was filed. Trump and other defendants argued that the relationship created a conflict of interest that should disqualify Willis and her office from continuing with her prosecution of the case. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee ruled in March that Willis’ actions showed a “tremendous lapse in judgment,” but he did not find a conflict of interest that would disqualify Willis. He said she could continue her prosecution as long as Wade stepped aside, which he did. The appeal of that ruling remains pending but must be decided by March. Chesebro was charged in August 2023, alongside Trump and 17 others , in the sprawling indictment accusing them of participating in a wide-ranging scheme to overturn Trump's loss in the 2020 presidential election in Georgia. He pleaded guilty to a single conspiracy count a few months later after reaching a deal with prosecutors just before he was to go to trial. His lawyer on Wednesday asked Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee to invalidate the plea after McAfee in September tossed out the charge to which he had pleaded guilty. “In Georgia, a defendant cannot plead guilty to a charge that does not constitute a crime,” defense attorney Manny Arora wrote, adding that a failure to invalidate his plea would violate Chesebro's constitutional right to due process. Prosecutors have said Chesebro was part of a plot to have a group of 16 Georgia Republicans sign a certificate falsely saying that Trump had won Georgia and declaring themselves the state’s “duly elected and qualified” electors. He pleaded guilty in October 2023 to one felony charge of conspiracy to commit filing false documents related to the the filing of that document with the federal court in Atlanta. In a September ruling, McAfee wrote that punishing someone for filing certain documents with a federal court would “enable a state to constrict the scope of materials assessed by a federal court and impair the administration of justice in that tribunal to police its own proceedings.” He concluded that the count must be quashed “as beyond the jurisdiction of this State.”Vietnam signs $286 million in defense contracts at 2024 international expo