lucky ukulele chords

lucky ukulele chords In conclusion, the case of someone earning 30,000 by borrowing hundreds of thousands through auto loan fraud serves as a cautionary tale of the dangers lurking within the shadows of the financial world. It is a stark reminder that greed and deception know no bounds, and that vigilance is paramount in safeguarding against exploitation and fraud. Only by coming together as a society to confront these issues head-on can we hope to build a more just and equitable future for all.

The Monkey Zu hairstyle has not only captivated the fashion world but has also sparked a larger conversation about self-expression and creativity. By breaking away from conventional norms and embracing a more unconventional approach to hairstyling, Zhang Zuo has encouraged others to think outside the box and embrace their unique sense of style. The hairstyle serves as a reminder that beauty knows no bounds and that true artistry lies in the ability to push boundaries and challenge the status quo.

Tech rebound supports Asian equitiesScott Jennings left a fellow CNN panelist speechless after he claimed X is the most ideologically balanced social media platform – and backed it up with one of the left-leaning network’s own reports. “I saw a survey this week – it’s [X] now the most ideologically balanced user platform of any platform,” Jennings said during CNN NewsNight on Monday. CNN panelist and television personality Cari Champion shot back: “You cannot say that.” “Who’s your source?” she demanded as the network’s panelists talked over one another. Jennings exclaimed: “We’ve reported it on this network!” The week before, CNN senior data reporter Harry Enten had discussed survey findings from the Pew Research Center that found billionaire Elon Musk’s X userbase has grown more politically balanced – though the platform has lost users and Musk himself has grown less favorable. The social media platform’s userbase is a nearly even split between 48% of Democrat users and 47% of Republican users, according to the data. In 2022, a 65% majority of the platform’s users had identified as Democrats, Enten said. After Jennings claimed the platform was balanced, Champion said, “It’s not accurate and you know it.” The debate ensued after panelists compared Elon Musk’s acquisition of X to governments purchasing media outlets to use as propaganda. Musk, the richest person in the world with a net worth of $329.9 billion according to Forbes, acquired the social media company, formerly known as Twitter, for $44 billion in 2022 . He has since taken heat for deregulating across the site, which resulted in racist and antisemitic posts popping up alongside paid advertisements as well as misinformation . “Is the concern that certain media outlets would become propaganda arms of political ideologies?” Jennings asked. “I mean, don’t we already have that in this country at a large scale?” Champion argued in favor of more regulation on Musk’s platform. “No one’s regulating the n-word, no one’s regulating the criticism, no one is regulating how people are treated,” Champion said. Jennings questioned where Champion would draw the line on limiting the First Amendment. “Let me tell you something, if I came on here and I just started calling you all kinds of names, do you think the bosses would continue to let me do that?” Champion said. “There’s a level of professionalism in what we do here because we are journalists and we adhere to something, at least morally, and there is no moral compass on this thing called X.”As Taiwan embraces "贪" as its Representative Character, it embarks on a journey towards a better future, one where values of honesty, fairness, and transparency are upheld and celebrated. It is a reminder that true progress is not just measured by economic growth or technological advancement, but by the strength of the moral compass that guides a society.

B ashar al-Assad’s downfall came not with a bang but a whimper. The Syrian dictator reportedly fled his home in the wake of a blitzkrieg advance by a coalition of anti-government rebels. By Sunday morning he was gone – leaving armed groups as the country’s dominant political players. A spirit of anti-Assad sentiment surged across Syria, manifesting itself through displays of both celebration and defiance. The question now is whether this unleashed energy – brutally suppressed by fear and authoritarian control – will become a unifying force in building a new nation or, rather, a precursor to deeper divisions. The fall of the House of Assad, which has ruled Syria for more than half a century, should be a warning to dictatorial regimes. Mr Assad’s departure underscores a broader truth: societies cannot indefinitely tolerate systemic abuses, such as state-sponsored propaganda, corruption and violence . The fish rots from the head down. Mr Assad’s Syrian state collapsed from within, having spent more than a decade pursuing a reign of terror that only fuelled the very unrest it sought to suppress. The regime’s collapse raises pressing questions about Syria’s future. With weak institutions and a frail civil society, the risk of disintegration looms large. Syria’s prospects depend on both internal and external forces, and notably on Abu Mohammed al-Jolani , the leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a former al-Qaida offshoot turned moderate Islamist faction. Credited with Mr Assad’s overthrow, Mr Jolani drove the strategic shift from jihadism to national liberation. In 2021 , he declared that he had no intention of waging war against the west, and for the past five years he has overseen a semi-technocratic government in Idlib province for 3 million people under Turkish protection. HTS has avoided extreme sharia interpretations, but remains designated a terrorist group. Critics say it is corrupt and intolerant of dissent. However, Mr Jolani’s outreach to tribes, minorities and former foes has bolstered his national legitimacy, while even Moscow – once Mr Assad’s protector – may engage to secure its military bases. Mr Jolani relies on allies, including the Turkish-backed militia groups collectively called the Syrian National Army, which has a thuggish reputation . Re-elected on a pledge to return 3 million refugees, Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, seeks stability in Syria, but fears that US-backed Kurdish regions in Syria may stir autonomy demands at home. Israel sees an Islamist-led Damascus as a threat, but finds comfort in Hezbollah’s inability to defend the Assad regime, as it prioritises the defence of its Lebanese bases. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with their financial resources, could aid Syria’s reconstruction, but their past support for Mr Assad complicates their role. Encouragingly , Arab leaders said they would seek to avoid reigniting a 13-year-old civil war after talks in Qatar. Syria will never be the same. Ordinary Syrians have endured unimaginable horrors under the Assad regime. But they have written this chapter of history. Their newfound freedom is shadowed by the daunting task of rebuilding lives and infrastructure. A shared hope to avoid violent vendettas must guide efforts toward a just settlement. The Syrian people were often forsaken. In this moment of fragile hope, the world must not fail them again. A concerted international effort toward political stability, reconciliation and reconstruction is essential to ensure their sacrifices lead to a lasting peace.

Vawda links PTI protest to Faiz Hameed trial