superaceph

superaceph Chiefs top Panthers in Mahomes-led 30-27 road winAustralian Gov't Recalls Bill on Combating Misinformation on Internet

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. ( NYSE:RCL – Get Free Report ) Director Arne Alexander Wilhelmsen sold 139,353 shares of Royal Caribbean Cruises stock in a transaction that occurred on Thursday, November 21st. The stock was sold at an average price of $237.89, for a total transaction of $33,150,685.17. Following the completion of the sale, the director now owns 18,167,507 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $4,321,868,240.23. This represents a 0.76 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through the SEC website . Arne Alexander Wilhelmsen also recently made the following trade(s): Royal Caribbean Cruises Stock Performance NYSE RCL opened at $241.49 on Friday. The company has a quick ratio of 0.16, a current ratio of 0.19 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.63. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. has a twelve month low of $103.61 and a twelve month high of $242.20. The business has a 50-day moving average price of $201.02 and a 200-day moving average price of $171.49. The firm has a market cap of $64.93 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 24.82, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.63 and a beta of 2.59. Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades Several equities analysts have recently weighed in on RCL shares. UBS Group increased their price target on Royal Caribbean Cruises from $168.00 to $183.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Wednesday, July 31st. Tigress Financial raised their target price on Royal Caribbean Cruises from $210.00 to $270.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Thursday, November 7th. Truist Financial upped their price target on shares of Royal Caribbean Cruises from $175.00 to $204.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Thursday, September 26th. Morgan Stanley raised their price objective on shares of Royal Caribbean Cruises from $140.00 to $154.00 and gave the stock an “equal weight” rating in a report on Wednesday, August 7th. Finally, Susquehanna upped their target price on shares of Royal Caribbean Cruises from $160.00 to $180.00 and gave the company a “positive” rating in a report on Tuesday, July 30th. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, two have assigned a hold rating and thirteen have issued a buy rating to the company’s stock. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, the company currently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $220.00. Check Out Our Latest Analysis on RCL Institutional Trading of Royal Caribbean Cruises A number of institutional investors and hedge funds have recently bought and sold shares of RCL. Anchor Investment Management LLC grew its position in shares of Royal Caribbean Cruises by 175.0% during the third quarter. Anchor Investment Management LLC now owns 319 shares of the company’s stock valued at $57,000 after purchasing an additional 203 shares in the last quarter. SOA Wealth Advisors LLC. boosted its stake in Royal Caribbean Cruises by 33.3% during the third quarter. SOA Wealth Advisors LLC. now owns 300 shares of the company’s stock valued at $53,000 after buying an additional 75 shares during the last quarter. Virtue Capital Management LLC purchased a new position in Royal Caribbean Cruises during the 3rd quarter valued at approximately $210,000. Coldstream Capital Management Inc. increased its stake in Royal Caribbean Cruises by 9.5% in the 3rd quarter. Coldstream Capital Management Inc. now owns 5,796 shares of the company’s stock worth $1,053,000 after acquiring an additional 505 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Disciplined Growth Investors Inc. MN raised its holdings in shares of Royal Caribbean Cruises by 2.3% during the 3rd quarter. Disciplined Growth Investors Inc. MN now owns 591,552 shares of the company’s stock worth $104,918,000 after acquiring an additional 13,520 shares in the last quarter. 87.53% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors. About Royal Caribbean Cruises ( Get Free Report ) Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. operates as a cruise company worldwide. The company operates cruises under the Royal Caribbean International, Celebrity Cruises, and Silversea Cruises brands, which comprise a range of itineraries. As of February 21, 2024, it operated 65 ships. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Featured Articles Receive News & Ratings for Royal Caribbean Cruises Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Royal Caribbean Cruises and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Chicago’s Korean community was rattled Tuesday following the news that South Korea’s president declared martial law amid an ongoing feud with his political rivals. President Yoon Suk Yeol’s order briefly threw the country into turmoil, sparking mass protests in the early morning hours. Less than three hours later, South Korea’s National Assembly unanimously voted to lift it, vowing to protect democracy. Yoon eventually backed down from his declaration. “Community members are concerned about what’s happening. Many of them are here as Korean Americans, but they still have family and people they care about in Korea,” said Danae Kovac, the executive director of the HANA Center, a Chicago-based community organization serving Korean Americans and immigrants in the region. Following the recent U.S. presidential election, Kovac said Chicago’s Korean immigrant community was already on edge. About 62,000 Koreans live in the area, according to 2020 census figures. “This is causing more turmoil and concern in the community here in Chicago,” Kovac said. “We are already feeling a lot of anxiety and fear because of the recent election and the impending attacks on immigrants and people of color here in this country.” Tuesday’s events marked the first time in more than four decades that martial law was declared in South Korea, which saw the end of a military dictatorship and the start of democratization in 1987. Martial law was last declared in October 1979, following the assassination of former military dictator Park Chung-hee. Yoon’s attempt was also a reminder that South Korea began as a dictatorship, said Ji-Yeon Yuh, a professor in Asian American history and Asian diasporas at Northwestern University. “Until the 1980s, South Korea was a military dictatorship and martial law was declared frequently,” Yuh said. “The people rose up frequently; there were lots of crackdowns by the military.” But, following several decades of struggle, South Korea became a democracy in the 1980s, Yuh said. “South Korea went from the dark days of a severely oppressive military dictatorship to a really vibrant and active participatory democracy,” Yuh said, adding, “To the point where citizens can force South Korea’s president out of office, and once they leave office are held accountable in a court of law for their crimes and then convicted and jailed for their corruption.” While Yoon’s actions are certainly alarming, Yuh said, the response by the Korean people and lawmakers shows the might of an active democracy. “The people of South Korea said, ‘We are not going back,’” Yuh said. “Martial law is a regressive step. We are not going back to those dark days of a military dictatorship.” For some Korean Americans, the memories of life under that dictatorship are still fresh, Kovac said. “The military dictatorship was not that long ago,” she said. “People remember the history not just as a distant memory. Some of our older community members lived it in Korea, while others were here seeing what was happening.” The HANA Center serves 16,000 people each year, the majority of whom are Koreans but they also work with other multi-ethnic groups, Kovac said. The organization provides a range of social services and advocates for stronger policies that support immigrants. Yoon declared martial law to eliminate “anti-state” forces as he struggles against the opposition, South Korea’s liberal Democratic Party, which controls the country’s parliament. He also accuses the party of sympathizing with communist North Korea, a move that’s become part of the hard right’s playbook in South Korea, Yuh said. Hundreds of protesters gathered in front of the country’s Assembly in Seoul, calling for Yoon to resign or be impeached. Under South Korea’s constitution, the president can declare martial law during “wartime, war-like situations or other comparable national emergency states” that require the use of military force to maintain peace and order. Yoon has been an unpopular leader since he was narrowly elected in 2022. When martial law is declared, “special measures” can be employed to restrict the freedom of press, freedom of assembly and the power of courts. The constitution also states that the president must oblige when the 300-seat National Assembly demands the lifting of martial law with a majority vote. On Tuesday, the 190 lawmakers who participated in the vote supported the lifting of martial law. Television footage showed soldiers, who had been stationed at parliament following the martial law order, leaving the National Assembly after the vote. To Yuh, the assembly’s rebuke showed why it’s important for lawmakers to stand by their country before their political party. “His own party denounced martial law,” Yuh said. “There’s a divide in South Korea between the president and his political party. The president does not control his political party and that makes for a healthy democracy.” Contributing: Associated Press

Fiorentina’s Bove ‘stable’ after collapse as Napoli remain on topLukaku scores against his former club and Napoli beats Roma 1-0 to reclaim Serie A lead

FACT FOCUS: Vermont ruling does not say schools can vaccinate children without parental consentNoneWe're going to rewind a couple of days to something The Atlantic's David Frum said, which has gotten more interesting in light of the recent Hunter Biden pardon We are headed toward a US constitutional crisis vastly bigger than Watergate Really? Really? They keep saying 'constitutional crisis' as if that means anything to the American people. The Left has done more damage to the Constitution than Donald Trump ever could ( as this writer pointed out back in April when the Senate didn't hold impeachment trials for DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas ). As she said then, that was an actual Constitutional crisis of the Democrats' making. Anything 'constitutional crisis' that happens now that Joe Biden has pardoned his son is also on their shoulders, too. No reason to panic if you haven't broken any laws. What's the problem? Isn't that what they said about the myriad investigations into Donald Trump? It sure is. “I promised to ease student debt...The Supreme Court blocked me, but it didn’t stop me.” - Biden, 1/2024 Oh, look, another giant middle finger to the Constitution. No, we already had a Constitutional crisis when the FBI subverted Trump’s first term with a bogus investigation. We are now headed towards fixing it. That's what's upsetting them. Watergate was a crisis because the left wanted it to be a crisis. We've seen Democrats do much worse since then with shrug by their elitist friends such as yourself. Like when Biden pardoned his son and the Left shrugged. To Democrats, a “Constitutional Crisis” is when they don’t have the political power to strip the rest of the Country from our Constitutional Rights Nailed it. You mean a crisis bigger than the deep state trying to take out an elected president in 2016-2020? Like that. Bush suspended Habeas Corpus for two years. You were his speechwriter. https://t.co/HdtTtvab4G Oh. https://t.co/gPGVp0eaHk pic.twitter.com/bfp3kaPXgp The perfect meme doesn't exis-- When we fully discover what happened during the Biden administration, Watergate might look mild by comparison https://t.co/9FtHt0U9pZ Yep. Wasn’t this you guys like 12 seconds ago? https://t.co/GIaOVXTL4b pic.twitter.com/CK61WyNlls It sure is. I think it’s time that we start de-mythologizing Watergate by finally admitting that Watergate actually wasn’t that bad in the grand scheme of political scandals, it was just the first scandal that the boomers remember and they invested a lot of emotion in believing it was... https://t.co/hkeWWAi88Z All of this. I’m here to once again remind you that “outcome you very much don’t like or think shouldn’t be allowed but which is permitted the terms of the Constitution” is not a constitutional crisis https://t.co/AMWNCzzcj5 It is not a constitutional crisis.

The Prince and Princess of Wales’ official London residence, Kensington Palace, was temporarily closed on Sunday due to hazardous weather conditions brought by Storm Bert. In an announcement shared on social media, a closure notice stated: “Due to Storm Bert, there are a number of closures across our sites on Sunday, 24 November. “Kensington Palace is closed today—please see our website for more on the gardens at Hampton Court Palace and Hillsborough Castle.” A warning sign at the palace gates reinforced the message, reading: “Park closed. Hazardous conditions — do not enter.” The storm wreaked havoc across large parts of the United Kingdom over the weekend, unleashing powerful winds, torrential rain, and snowfall. Flood warnings remain active in England, Scotland, and Wales, with authorities urging caution in affected areas. While Prince William and Princess Kate primarily reside at Adelaide Cottage in Windsor, Kensington Palace remains their official London home. The palace holds historical significance for the couple, who previously lived there with their children in the luxurious Apartment 1A. The grand apartment boasts five reception rooms, three primary bedrooms, dressing rooms, and nurseries, alongside staff accommodations. Despite stepping back from living there full-time, the property remains a cornerstone of their royal duties. The palace was recently described in vivid detail by Prince Harry in his memoir *Spare*. Reflecting on a visit he and Meghan Markle made to Kensington Palace in June 2018, he wrote: “Willy and Kate invited us over for tea. To clear the air. We walked over one late afternoon. I saw Meg’s eyes widen as we entered their front door, walked past their front sitting room, down their hallway, into their study. ‘Wow,’ Meg said several times. The wallpaper, the crown moulding, the walnut bookshelves lined with color-coordinated volumes, the priceless art. Gorgeous. Like a museum.” Harry humorously contrasted their lavish surroundings with his and Meghan’s own modest furnishings, noting: “We complimented them lavishly on their renovation, though we also thought sheepishly of our IKEA lamps, our discount sofa recently bought on sale with Meg’s credit card, from sofa.com.” As the storm’s aftermath continues to impact the region, Kensington Palace’s closure underscores the severe weather conditions gripping the UK. Updates on re-openings and safety measures are expected in the coming days. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );