mnl777 register online

mnl777 register online Trump team signs agreement to allow Justice to conduct background checks on nominees, staffHabs rook posts rare debut shutout vs. Cup champA dispute has been intensifying over the bill introduced by the main opposition party aimed at revising South Korea’s commercial law as top officials voice conflicting views and the business community expresses strong opposition to the proposed amendment. The controversy started early this year as President Yoon Suk Yeol said that the government would push for an amendment to the law so that “boards of directors can reflect the interests of minority shareholders in a responsible way.” At the heart of the issue is the Korean Commercial Act, which currently stipulates that directors must perform their duties in good faith in the interests of the company. The revision will expand the fiduciary duty of directors from the company to shareholders. The proposed inclusion of shareholders’ interest in the clause of the Commercial Act may appear logical and reasonable. Executives are supposed to act in a way that protects and boosts the interests of shareholders, whether they are major or minor -- a sort of common sense in the global business community. But it is not a simple issue in South Korea, where large family-controlled conglomerates have often conducted business focused entirely on the interests of a small number of controlling shareholders. As a result, minority shareholders have been impacted by unilateral business decisions on mergers, spinoffs and contracts made in the name of “the company.” Such practices, linked to opaque corporate governance at Korean firms, are naturally cited as a key reason for the undervaluation of Korean stocks, known as the “Korea Discount.” The Yoon administration has sought to address this chronic problem as part of its “Corporate Value-Up” program to shore up the Korean stock market. But not all government officials support the idea. A striking example is the comment made Sunday on a TV program by Kim Byung-hwan, chairman of the Financial Services Commission. Kim said corporate governance should be made more transparent, but more discussions are needed to see whether the revision to the Commercial Act should be implemented. In outlining the potential drawbacks anticipated from the proposed amendments to the Commercial Act, Kim expressed several concerns: the potential for an increase in frivolous lawsuits by minority shareholders, delays and heightened uncertainty in corporate decision-making, excessive demands and hostile moves from foreign speculative capital, and the likely waste of company resources in defending against such threats. As an alternative to revising the Commercial Act, Kim proposed amendments to the Capital Markets Act to better achieve shareholder protection. He said, “Governance issues have been raised in the context of mergers and demergers, and we need to address these through tailored institutional improvements.” Kim clearly has a point, but the problem is that his perspective is not aligned with Lee Bok-hyun, the governor of the Financial Supervisory Service, who has called for the revision to the Commercial Act on many occasions. Given that the two financial authorities represented by Kim and Lee are supposed to work together and voice a unified position on key issues, Kim’s latest remark suggests a split in opinion even among key financial policymakers on the revision led by the main opposition Democratic Party of Korea. In a related development, the presidents of 16 major companies issued a joint statement on Thursday opposing the proposed revision of the Commercial Act. In the statement, they claimed that the changes would hinder the operations of boards of directors, citing an increase in lawsuits and attacks from foreign speculative investors. Critics, however, countered that if directors refrain from acting solely in the interests of controlling shareholders at the expense of minority shareholders, lawsuits are unlikely to arise in the first place. Given the potential impact of the revision, the Yoon administration has to address conflicting views within the financial authorities, gather more opinions and seek cooperation with the main opposition party.

UN watchdog to conduct probe into sexual misconduct allegations against top international prosecutorBeyonce, Jay-Z spark divorce speculations amid recent allegations Jay-Z and Beyonce’s marriage seems unsteady as the rapper’s accusations come to the surface Beyonce and Jay-Z’s marriage seems to be standing on shaky grounds as rumours circulate all over social media. Queen Bey and the recently accused rapper are in possession of assets worth $2.6 billion together but this valuable union is apparently on the brink of collapse. Recent allegations including rape and involvement in Diddy’s ‘freak off’ parties have further fueled the flames of divorce speculations. As per a RadarOnline.com report, the 55-year-old rapper has been accused of engagement in heinous crimes at an afterparty of the MTV Video Music Awards in 2000. The rapper has strictly denied the accusations, dubbing them “heinous” and voicing his concerns regarding deep affliction these allegations have caused his family. The Renegade singer added that the situation has caused "another loss of innocence" for their children, including 12-year-old Blue Ivy and 7-year-old twins, Rumi and Sir. However, amid these accusations, the Diva songstress has publicly expressed her support of her husband. The couple presented a united front at the Los Angeles premiere of Mufasa: The Lion King , accompanied by Beyoncé's mother, Tina Knowles, and their eldest daughter, Blue Ivy. Despite appearing to support her husband, the outlet reported that sources claim that the public support was an attempt at damage control during the rising controversies. An insider revealed, "Beyoncé has friends saying she should not only distance herself from Jay but leave him altogether." Queen Bey’s husband also appeared to show subtle support for her as he attended her NFL show at Christmas, but he was not captured in the Netflix livestream of the show. Both Beyonce and Jay-Z have not addressed the situation publicly. Princess Anne's granddaughter follows in footsteps of senior Royals King Charles reign's big secret revealed Diddy, Luigi Mangione expected to cross paths ‘eventually’ at New York jail Brianna LaPaglia celebrates gaining weight after awful break-up

Elon Musk throws weight behind German far right party

Trading MicroStrategy Stock In Bitcoin's Run? Get 'A Little Bit More Cautious' Says Stock Watcher. - Investor's Business Daily

By SARAH PARVINI, GARANCE BURKE and JESSE BEDAYN, Associated Press President-elect Donald Trump will return to power next year with a raft of technological tools at his disposal that would help deliver his campaign promise of cracking down on immigration — among them, surveillance and artificial intelligence technology that the Biden administration already uses to help make crucial decisions in tracking, detaining and ultimately deporting immigrants lacking permanent legal status. While immigration officials have used the tech for years, an October letter from the Department of Homeland Security obtained exclusively by The Associated Press details how those tools — some of them powered by AI — help make life-altering decisions for immigrants, including whether they should be detained or surveilled. One algorithm, for example, ranks immigrants with a “Hurricane Score,” ranging from 1-5, to assess whether someone will “abscond” from the agency’s supervision. Related Articles The letter, sent by DHS Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer Eric Hysen to the immigrant rights group Just Futures Law, revealed that the score calculates the potential risk that an immigrant — with a pending case — will fail to check in with Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The algorithm relies on several factors, he said, including an immigrant’s number of violations and length of time in the program, and whether the person has a travel document. Hysen wrote that ICE officers consider the score, among other information, when making decisions about an immigrant’s case. “The Hurricane Score does not make decisions on detention, deportation, or surveillance; instead, it is used to inform human decision-making,” Hysen wrote. Also included in the government’s tool kit is a mobile app called SmartLINK that uses facial matching and can track an immigrant’s specific location. Nearly 200,000 people without legal status who are in removal proceedings are enrolled in the Alternatives to Detention program, under which certain immigrants can live in the U.S. while their immigration cases are pending. In exchange, SmartLINK and GPS trackers used by ICE rigorously surveil them and their movements. The phone application draws on facial matching technology and geolocation data, which has been used before to find and arrest those using the app. Just Futures Law wrote to Hysen earlier this year, questioning the fairness of using an algorithm to assess whether someone is a flight risk and raising concerns over how much data SmartLINK collects. Such AI systems, which score or screen people, are used widely but remain largely unregulated even though some have been found to discriminate on race, gender or other protected traits. DHS said in an email that it is committed to ensuring that its use of AI is transparent and safeguards privacy and civil rights while avoiding biases. The agency said it is working to implement the Biden administration’s requirements on using AI , but Hysen said in his letter that security officials may waive those requirements for certain uses. Trump has publicly vowed to repeal Biden’s AI policy when he returns to the White House in January. “DHS uses AI to assist our personnel in their work, but DHS does not use the outputs of AI systems as the sole basis for any law enforcement action or denial of benefits,” a spokesperson for DHS told the AP. Trump has not revealed how he plans to carry out his promised deportation of an estimated 11 million people living in the country illegally. Although he has proposed invoking wartime powers, as well as military involvement, the plan would face major logistical challenges — such as where to keep those who have been detained and how to find people spread across the country — that AI-powered surveillance tools could potentially address. Karoline Leavitt, a spokesperson for Trump, did not answer questions about how they plan to use DHS’ tech, but said in a statement that “President Trump will marshal every federal and state power necessary to institute the largest deportation operation” in American history. Over 100 civil society groups sent a letter on Friday urging the Office of Management and Budget to require DHS to comply with the Biden administration’s guidelines. OMB did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Just Futures Law’s executive director, Paromita Shah, said if immigrants are scored as flight risks, they are more likely to remain in detention, “limiting their ability to prepare a defense in their case in immigration court, which is already difficult enough as it is.” SmartLINK, part of the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program, is run by BI Inc., a subsidiary of the private prison company The GEO Group. The GEO Group also contracts with ICE to run detention centers. ICE is tight-lipped about how it uses SmartLINK’s location feature to find and arrest immigrants. Still, public records show that during Trump’s first term in 2018, Manassas, Virginia-based employees of BI Inc. relayed immigrants’ GPS locations to federal authorities, who then arrested over 40 people. In a report last year to address privacy issues and concerns, DHS said that the mobile app includes security features that “prohibit access to information on the participant’s mobile device, with the exception of location data points when the app is open.” But the report notes that there remains a risk that data collected from people “may be misused for unauthorized persistent monitoring.” Such information could also be stored in other ICE and DHS databases and used for other DHS mission purposes, the report said. On investor calls earlier this month, private prison companies were clear-eyed about the opportunities ahead. The GEO Group’s executive chairman George Christopher Zoley said that he expects the incoming Trump administration to “take a much more aggressive approach regarding border security as well as interior enforcement and to request additional funding from Congress to achieve these goals.” “In GEO’s ISAP program, we can scale up from the present 182,500 participants to several hundreds of thousands, or even millions of participants,” Zoley said. That same day, the head of another private prison company told investors he would be watching closely to see how the new administration may change immigrant monitoring programs. “It’s an opportunity for multiple vendors to engage ICE about the program going forward and think about creative and innovative solutions to not only get better outcomes, but also scale up the program as necessary,” Damon Hininger, CEO of the private prison company CoreCivic Inc. said on an earnings call. GEO did not respond to requests for comment. In a statement, CoreCivic said that it has played “a valued but limited role in America’s immigration system” for both Democrats and Republicans for over 40 years.After delay, Trump signs agreement with Biden White House to begin formal transition handoff

UCL 2024-25: Arsenal crushes Sporting 5-1 to extend revivalNone

KUWAIT: The youth initiative “Blue Wave Group” organized a vibrant march on Thursday night in Souq Al-Mubarakiya to show support for the Kuwaiti national football team ahead of their match against Qatar in the Arabian Gulf Cup (Khaleeji Zain 26). The event, aimed at motivating the players, attracted fans of all ages. Participants waved Kuwaiti flags, held blue banners, and chanted familiar songs such as “Oh, ya Al-Azrag” and “Ana Kuwaiti ana” alongside other anthems that have become synonymous with the national team over the years. Souq Al-Mubarakiya has become a top destination for football fans attending Khaleeji Zain 26, the regional football tournament bringing together the eight Gulf nations. Taking place from December 21 to January 3 in Kuwait, the tournament has attracted supporters from Kuwait, Iraq, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Yemen, the UAE, and Qatar. The souq has been busy with fans from across the Gulf, who have brought their passion for football into the market. Many have been posting videos on social media, showing themselves supporting their teams, singing chants, and even playing impromptu games of football in the alleys of the market. — Agencies

Arne Slot's secret weapon behind Liverpool title charge laid bare by Marco van BastenTrump team signs agreement to allow Justice to conduct background checks on nominees, staff

Man City crisis continues as Feyenoord come from three down to drawLAS VEGAS (AP) — A team that previously boycotted at least one match against the San Jose State women's volleyball program will again be faced with the decision whether to play the school , this time in the Mountain West Conference semifinals with a shot at the NCAA Tournament on the line. Five schools forfeited matches in the regular season against San Jose State, which carried a No. 2 seed into the conference tournament in Las Vegas. Among those schools: No. 3 Utah State and No. 6 Boise State, who will face off Wednesday with the winner scheduled to play the Spartans in the semifinals on Friday. Wyoming, Nevada and Southern Utah — which is not a Mountain West member — also canceled regular-season matches, all without explicitly saying why they were forfeiting. Nevada players cited fairness in women’s sports as a reason to boycott their match, while political figures from Wyoming, Idaho, Utah and Nevada suggested the cancellations center around protecting women’s sports. In a lawsuit filed against the NCAA , plaintiffs cited unspecified reports asserting there was a transgender player on the San Jose State volleyball team, even naming her. While some media have reported those and other details, neither San Jose State nor the forfeiting teams have confirmed the school has a trans women’s volleyball player. The Associated Press is withholding the player’s name because she has not publicly commented on her gender identity and through school officials has declined an interview request. A judge on Monday rejected a request made by nine current conference players to block the San Jose State player from competing in the tournament on grounds that she is transgender. That ruling was upheld Tuesday by an appeals court. “The team looks forward to starting Mountain West Conference tournament competition on Friday,” San Jose State said in a statement issued after the appeals court decision. “The university maintains an unwavering commitment to the participation, safety and privacy of all students at San Jose State and ensuring they are able to compete in an inclusive, fair and respectful environment.” Boise State did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday. “Utah State is reviewing the court’s order," Doug Hoffman, Aggies associate athletic director for communications, said in an email. "Right now, our women’s volleyball program is focused on the game this Wednesday, and we’ll be cheering them on.” San Jose State, which had a first-round bye, would be sent directly to the conference title game if Utah State or Boise State were to forfeit again. If the Spartans make the title game, it's likely the opponent would not forfeit. They would face top-seeded Colorado State, No. 4 Fresno State or No. 5 San Diego State — all teams that played the Spartans this season. The conference champion receives an automatic bid to the NCAA Tournament. AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports

Will Utah State or Boise State forfeit vs. San Jose State in the Mountain West semifinals?I Will Find You: Netflix Orders Next Harlan Coben Show With Gotham Producer

WVU linebacker Josiah Trotter getting expert fatherly football advice. Inside the fund's portfolio are many of the world's most recognisable companies. They include , , , , , , , , and . I think investors can do well over the long term from this portfolio of businesses because of their underlying quality and track records. There's a lot to like about the IVV ETF. Here are three reasons why. The very appealing management fee is the most obvious reason to like the fund, in my opinion. When operating costs are very low, most of the fund's value and performance stay in the hands of IVV ETF investors rather than being lost to expensive management or performance fees. The low cost can make a difference in the thousands of dollars to an investor's portfolio value over the long term. How low is the cost? According to iShares, the current annual management fee is 0.04%. It's one of the cheapest fund investments on the ASX, which is great in my view. It would be a mistake to think of this fund as a US fund that is only focused on the US economy. Consider companies like Microsoft, Apple and Alphabet – these are truly global businesses with a presence in most countries around the world. McDonald's operates in around 119 countries. It's a similar story for many of these impressive companies. According to , around 29% of the total revenue generated by S&P 500 companies analysed came from non-US sources in the second quarter of 2024. Not only is earnings pleasing to see for the IVV ETF, but it also means those companies have numerous places to invest their money to try to grow earnings in the coming years and make the most substantial return. Warren Buffett is arguably one of the world's greatest-ever investors, who helped become the giant US company it is. He regularly advocates for (American) investors to choose an S&P 500 fund. In , Buffett said: Consistently buy an S&P 500 low-cost index fund. I think it's the thing that makes the most sense practically all of the time. Keep buying it through thick and thin, and especially through thin. The temptation when you see bad headlines in newspapers is to say, well, maybe I should skip a year or something. Just keep buying. American business is going to do fine over time, so you know the investment universe is going to do very well. If it's a great choice in Buffett's eyes, it's a compelling pick, in my opinion.

None

Stock market today: Rising tech stocks pull Wall Street to another recordStream It Or Skip It: ‘Conclave’ on VOD, an Ungodly Entertaining Pope-Election Drama Led by Ralph Fiennes