sperm turnover
sperm turnover
The US Supreme Court found in July that from prosecution. But is ? In a filing due by day's end on Monday, lawyers for Donald Trump are poised to argue just that — . His hush-money case should therefore be immediately dismissed, and wiped clean, his lawyers said last month that they plan to argue. "Just as a sitting President is completely immune from any criminal process, so too is President Trump as President-elect," Trump's legal team wrote the trial judge, New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan in . Monday is the defense team's deadline for spelling out to Merchan why a pre-inaugural Trump cannot be sentenced and why the whole case must instead be tossed — as if a nearly seven-year investigation and prosecution by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office had never happened. Trump was convicted six months ago on 34 counts of falsifying business records throughout his first year in office in order to retroactively hide a hush-money payment that silenced porn actress Stormy Daniels 11 days before the 2016 election. "On November 5, 2024, the Nation's People issued a mandate that supersedes the political motivations of DANY's 'People,'" Trump attorneys Todd Blanche and Emil Bove wrote to the judge on November 19, using the acronym for the District Attorney of New York. "This case must be immediately dismissed," wrote Blanche and Bove, now nominated by Trump to be his deputy attorney general and principal associate deputy attorney general, respectively. Just how Trump leaps from presidential immunity to president-elect immunity has yet to be fleshed out. The legal precedents and federal regulations cited so far by Blanche and Bove bridge the gap indirectly, and lawyers for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg have promised to fight the claim that such a thing as presidential-elect immunity even exists. "We believe these arguments are incorrect," Bragg to the November 19 defense letter. Bragg's letter this latest bid to dismiss the case. Prosecutors are due to respond to Monday's expected defense filing in a week, by Monday, December 9. Only after the judge decides if the case is dismissed can Trump's sentencing — — be calendared or canceled. And even if Merchan calendars it, Trump's lawyers have promised to halt the sentencing by immediately appealing his decision through the federal court system — to SCOTUS if necessary. The argument that a president-elect has immunity So why does Trump believe he enjoys presidential immunity from prosecution even now, as president-elect? Blanche and Bove first tipped their hand on their arguments in a November 8 letter to the judge — written just three days after the election. In the letter, they argue that presidents and presidents-elect are pretty much the same thing when it comes to enjoying legal protections from prosecution. The two lawyers quote from a 2000 Department of Justice memo barring the federal prosecution of sitting presidents (the same memo cited by special counsel Jack Smith in last week's .) "The same complete immunity from criminal process of any kind extends to a President-elect during the transition period," Blanche and Bove write, without elaborating on how DOJ policy would extend to a state prosecution like the hush-money case. "There is no material difference between President Trump's current status after his overwhelming victory in the national election and that of a sitting President following inauguration," the lawyers wrote. A second argument for special treatment of presidents-elect, made repeatedly by the two lawyers in the past month, draws on the Presidential Transition Act of 1963, which provides for the "orderly transfer of Executive powers." "President Trump has already commenced this complex, sensitive, and intensely time-consuming process," the two lawyers wrote of the transition on November 8. Continuing with the hush-money case would "be uniquely destabilizing" and threaten to "hamstring the operation of the whole government apparatus," the two wrote on November 19. In the furtherance of justice Trump's lawyers have also argued that the case should be dismissed under New York law, which allows an indictment to be dismissed A so-called interest of justice dismissal would require Merchan to find "some compelling factor, consideration or circumstance" under which continuing a prosecution "would constitute or result in injustice." Merchan would be asked to weigh the strength and seriousness of the offense, the extent of the harm it caused, and the "history, character, and condition of the defendant." He would also have to weigh "the impact of a dismissal upon the confidence of the public in the criminal justice system." Blanche and Bove did not immediately respond to a request for comment on this story. A spokesperson for the Manhattan DA's office also did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Read the original article on
IPPB SO recruitment 2024: Apply for 68 Manager, Cyber Security Expert and other posts, details hereBy DAVID A. LIEB Artificial intelligence. Abortion. Guns. Marijuana. Minimum wages. Name a hot topic, and chances are good there’s a new law about it taking effect in 2025 in one state or another. Many of the laws launching in January are a result of legislation passed this year. Others stem from ballot measures approved by voters. Some face legal challenges. Here’s a look at some of the most notable state laws taking effect: California, home to Hollywood and some of the largest technology companies, is seeking to rein in the artificial intelligence industry and put some parameters around social media stars. New laws seek to prevent the use of digital replicas of Hollywood actors and performers without permission and allow the estates of dead performers to sue over unauthorized AI use. Parents who profit from social media posts featuring their children will be required to set aside some earnings for their young influencers. A new law also allows children to sue their parents for failing to do so. New social media restrictions in several states face court challenges. Related Articles National Politics | Trump has pressed for voting changes. GOP majorities in Congress will try to make that happen National Politics | Exhausted by political news? TV ratings and new poll say you’re not alone National Politics | Trump vows to pursue executions after Biden commutes most of federal death row National Politics | Elon Musk’s preschool is the next step in his anti-woke education dreams National Politics | Trump’s picks for top health jobs not just team of rivals but ‘team of opponents’ A Florida law bans children under 14 from having social media accounts and requires parental consent for ages 14 and 15. But enforcement is being delayed because of a lawsuit filed by two associations for online companies, with a hearing scheduled for late February. A new Tennessee law also requires parental consent for minors to open accounts on social media. NetChoice, an industry group for online businesses, is challenging the law. Another new state law requires porn websites to verify that visitors are at least 18 years old. But the Free Speech Coalition, a trade association for the adult entertainment industry, has filed a challenge. Several new California measures aimed at combating political deepfakes are also being challenged, including one requiring large social media platforms to remove deceptive content related to elections and another allowing any individual to sue for damages over the use of AI to create fabricated images or videos in political ads . In a first nationally, California will start enforcing a law prohibiting school districts from adopting policies that require staff to notify parents if their children change their gender identification . The law was a priority for Democratic lawmakers who wanted to halt such policies passed by several districts. Many states have passed laws limiting or protecting abortion rights since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a nationwide right to the procedure in 2022. One of the latest is the Democratic-led state of Delaware. A law there will require the state employee health plan and Medicaid plans for lower-income residents to cover abortions with no deductible , copayments or other cost-sharing requirements. A new Minnesota law prohibits guns with “binary triggers” that allow for more rapid fire, causing a weapon to fire one round when the trigger is pulled and another when it is released. In Delaware, a law adds colleges and universities to a list of school zones where guns are prohibited, with exceptions for those working in their official capacity such as law officers and commissioned security guards. Kentucky is becoming the latest state to let people use marijuana for medical purposes . To apply for a state medical cannabis card, people must get written certification from a medical provider of a qualifying condition, such as cancer, multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, epilepsy, chronic nausea or post-traumatic stress disorder. Nearly four-fifths of U.S. states have now legalized medical marijuana. Minimum wage workers in more than 20 states are due to receive raises in January. The highest minimum wages will be in Washington, California and Connecticut, all of which will top $16 an hour after modest increases. The largest increases are scheduled in Delaware, where the minimum wage will rise by $1.75 to $15 an hour, and in Nebraska, where a ballot measure approved by voters in 2022 will add $1.50 to the current minimum of $12 an hour. Twenty other states still follow the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour. In Oregon, using drugs on public transit will be considered a misdemeanor crime of interfering with public transportation. While the measure worked its way through the legislature, multiple transportation officials said drug use on buses and trains, and at transit stops and stations, was making passengers and drivers feel less safe. In Missouri, law enforcement officers have spent the past 16 months issuing warnings to motorists that handheld cellphone use is illegal. Starting with the new year, penalties will kick in: a $150 fine for the first violation, progressing to $500 for third and subsequent offenses and up to 15 years imprisonment if a driver using a cellphone cause an injury or death. But police must notice a primary violation, such as speeding or weaving across lanes, to cite motorists for violating the cellphone law. Montana is the only state that hasn’t banned texting while driving , according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Tenants in Arizona will no longer have to pay tax on their monthly rent , thanks to the repeal of a law that had allowed cities and towns to impose such taxes. While a victory for renters, the new law is a financial loss for governments. An analysis by Arizona’s nonpartisan Joint Legislative Budget Committee estimated that $230 million would be lost in municipal tax revenue during the first full fiscal year of implementation. Meanwhile Alabama will offer tax credits to businesses that help employees with child care costs. Kansas is eliminating its 2% sales tax on groceries. It also is cutting individual income taxes by dropping the top tax rate, increasing a credit for child care expenses and exempting all Social Security income from taxes, among other things. Taxpayers are expected to save about $320 million a year going forward. An Oklahoma law expands voting privileges to people who have been convicted of felonies but had their sentences discharged or commuted, including commutations for crimes that have been reclassified from felonies to misdemeanors. Former state Sen. George Young, an Oklahoma City Democrat, carried the bill in the Senate. “I think it’s very important that people who have gone through trials and tribulations in their life, that we have a system that brings them back and allows them to participate as contributing citizens,” Young said. Associated Press writers Trân Nguyễn in Sacramento, California; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; Jonathan Mattise in Nashville, Tennessee; Randall Chase in Dover, Delaware; Steve Karnowski in Minneapolis; Bruce Schreiner in Frankfort, Kentucky; Claire Rush in Portland, Oregon; Summer Ballentine in Jefferson City, Missouri; Gabriel Sandoval in Phoenix; Kim Chandler in Montgomery, Alabama; John Hanna in Topeka, Kansas; and Sean Murphy in Oklahoma City contributed.
OpenAI’s ChatGPT platform and Sora video generator have gone offline and are currently not responding to user queries. Social media accounts began posting about the outage around 1:30 p.m. ET on Thursday, which coincided with a surge of reports to Down Detector . The company confirmed the outage in a blog post at 2 p.m. ET stating, “we are currently experiencing an issue with high error rates on ChatGPT, the API, and Sora. We are currently investigating and will post an update as soon as we are able.” OpenAI provided that update just 18 minutes later, explaining that, “this issue is caused by an upstream provider and we are currently monitoring.” Just after 3 p.m. ET, the company added, “we are continuing to work on a fix for this issue,” though there is currently no timeline for when service might be restored. OpenAI has suffered similar outages in the past few months. ChatGPT was knocked offline in a widespread outage in June that also impacted Google Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude, and Perplexity. Earlier in December, the Sora video generation model ran into “technical difficulties” just days after its release to Plus and Pro subscribers . In both cases, the company was able to resolve those respective issues within a few hours. This outage comes on the heels of the company’s “12 Days of OpenAI ” event that saw the release of numerous new products, including the full version of its o1 reasoning model (plus a teaser for its successor, called o3 ), as well as the Sora text-to-video model, and new capabilities for its Canvas and Advanced Voice Mode features.
Dear reader, Today is Christmas. So Merry Christmas and all that jazz to ye all. Most Christmas seasons, I think about what Jon Lee Anderson, a staff writer for The New Yorker , told me a few years ago when he visited a literature festival in India where I met him on the sidelines and talked about journalism in general and the threat to independent reporting in particular. He said: “The free press is one of the privileges that people would miss dreadfully if they lost it, like Christmas and the right to complain about the weather.” Anderson, as you’d know, has been in the business long enough to know viscerally what we sometimes forget in our age of information abundance—that freedom of the press, like Christmas, is both a celebration and a responsibility, both a gift and a commitment. The ace scribe knew what he was talking about. We are at such a juncture in history, especially in India, where the very basic tenets of a free press are shaken and stirred to suit the interests of big corporates, powerful political outfits, and super-powerful proto-fascist forces that have come to dominate our discourses in the past few years. It’s in this crucial context that our magazine, Frontline , marks its fourth decade of, as our editor Vaishna Roy terms it, “speaking truth to power”. One should be forgiven for wondering whether commemorating the anniversary of a magazine—which has existed in print format for more than 90 per cent of its lifespan so far—is rather like celebrating the birthday of a venerable but endangered species. The metaphor, while tempting, would be premature. For, while the challenges facing serious journalism have multiplied exponentially since our first issue in 1984, the need for thoughtful, investigative reporting and analytical commentary has, if anything, become more acute. Consider the curious dialectic of our times: We inhabit a world drowning in information yet parched for meaning. In this world, fake news travels at the speed of light while truth puts on its shoes. Social media algorithms now serve us precisely what we want to hear. And in that process, they insulate us from what we ought to know. In this absurd world, publications like ours, dear reader, exist not as relics of a bygone era but as essential navigational apparatus for parsing reality from its increasingly sophisticated simulations. The past 40 years have witnessed seismic shifts in how information is produced, consumed, delivered, and monetised. When this magazine began its journey, the primary threat to press freedom emanated from state power—censorship, intimidation, and the occasional midnight knock. Today’s challenges are more varied and insidious: the hollowing out of newsrooms by venture capital; the collapse of traditional revenue models; the attention economy’s ruthless prioritisation of clickbait over content; and most recently, the existential questions posed by artificial intelligence. Yet perhaps the greatest threat comes not from without but from within: the growing tendency of media organisations to self-censor, to trim their sails to prevailing political winds, to substitute access for accountability. George Orwell was spot on when he said “the most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history”. When media organisations become willing participants in such obliteration, they betray not just their professional obligations but democracy itself. This is not merely abstract theorising. Across the globe, we observe a disturbing pattern: the rise of elected autocrats who maintain a theatrical pretence of democracy while methodically disassembling its institutional foundations. We know how they play their game. It includes the neutering of independent media—sometimes through crude suppression, but more often through manipulation of ownership patterns and regulatory frameworks. The result is what we can call, in a rather absurd way, Potemkin pluralism: the outward appearance of press freedom hiding an inner reality of controlled narratives and, to borrow from Noam Chomsky, manufactured consent. Our own country’s experience over the past few decades offers an instructive case study. The transformation of much of the mainstream media into cheerleaders for power represents not just institutional capture but something more, for want of a better word, “profound”. Yes, I am talking about the voluntary surrender of journalistic independence in exchange for proximity to authority. Remember Vinod Mehta’s mordantly titled book Mr Editor, How Close Are You to the PM? ? That question has morphed from a satirical jab to a job requirement in certain newsrooms. The irony would not have been lost on Mehta, whose own career was all about a steadfast refusal to mistake access for journalism. These days, one suspects, the title might need updating to “Mr Editor, How Far Are You Willing to Bend?”—though perhaps that lacks the original’s elegant brevity. This phenomenon, a form of “embedded journalism”, represents a peculiarly 21st-century pathology: the conversion of the fourth estate into an extension of the state’s public relations apparatus. Yet paradoxically, this very capitulation has created new spaces for independent journalism. When mainstream media abandons its watchdog role, smaller publications and digital platforms have stepped into the breach, often producing work of courage and quality. These efforts, while heartening, face their own challenges—financial sustainability, limited reach, and vulnerability to state pressure. They remind us that while truth-telling remains possible, it increasingly requires both institutional backing and individual courage. The arrival and ascent of artificial intelligence pose fresh dilemmas at this juncture. We now confront a future where the line between human- and machine-generated content grows increasingly blurry. As our editor has pointed out many a time, today deepfakes have become indistinguishable from reality, where the very notion of verifiable truth comes under technological assault. These developments make the role of trusted journalistic institutions more vital as well as more vulnerable. Looking ahead, one sees both peril and possibility. The peril lies in the continuing erosion of democratic norms, the growing sophistication of propaganda techniques, and the ugly potential for technology to further blur the boundaries between fact and fiction. The possibility lies in the human hunger for understanding, for context, for truth-telling that goes beyond mere fact-gathering, and the possibilities offered by digital technologies in research, analysis, data-digging, and lightning-fast news delivery. This anniversary issue, then, represents not just a celebration of survival but a recommitment to first principles: to fearless reporting, to analytical rigour, and to the idea that journalism at its best serves not power but truth. Because, as Ben Bradlee of The Washington Post , put it: “The truth, no matter how bad, is never as dangerous as a lie in the long run.” In an age of alternative facts and manufactured realities, such commitment might seem quixotic. Yet as Hannah Arendt reminded us in an interview with Roger Errera in 1974 (this was her last public interview), “the moment we no longer have a free press, anything can happen.” That “anything”, we now know with the grim benefit of hindsight, encompasses rather more than mere theoretical possibilities. It includes starvation of millions; elimination of public intellectuals; genocides of many hues; environmental catastrophes; and more. And obviously, these concerns cannot be addressed through sound bites or social media posts. They require sustained examination, rigorous analysis, and above all, the courage to speak truth to power. This has been Frontline ’s mission for four decades. It remains our mission today, perhaps more urgent than ever in these times of cooked-up certainties and convenient untruths. For ultimately, journalism is all about providing the context that changes information magically into understanding. It is to this task that Frontline recommits itself as it enters its fifth decade—not with the certainty of having all the answers, but with the conviction that asking the right questions remains the first duty of serious journalism. With these thoughts, I welcome you to our 40th Anniversary Special , where 10 experts examine how India has changed over the past four decades in areas such as health, democracy, mass media, agriculture, and more. The issue also features essays by former editors N. Ram and R. Vijaya Sankar. P.S. When we started Frontline 40 years ago, our founders could hardly have imagined using an “@” symbol in our anniversary newsletter. Even the very idea of a newsletter was not there. Yet here we are: Frontline @ Forty. That little symbol tells quite a story—of how much has changed, what’s come in between, and where we’re headed. As always, read the pieces and write back! I will see you again on New Year’s Day. Wishing you a very happy year-ender, For Frontline, Jinoy Jose P. We hope you’ve been enjoying our newsletters featuring a selection of articles that we believe will be of interest to a cross-section of our readers. Tell us if you like what you read. And also, what you don’t like! Mail us at frontline@thehindu.co.in CONTRIBUTE YOUR COMMENTS SHARE THIS STORY Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp RedditFalcons visit Vikings as a struggling Cousins returns to old home to find a thriving Darnold
New 2025 laws hit hot topics from AI in movies to rapid-fire guns
Bank of America Announces Full Redemption of Its Series MM Preferred Stock and Related Depositary SharesPrepare for Friday’s action-packed slate, featuring college football and NBA games, with the Fanatics Sportsbook promo , offering new users $100 in No Sweat Bets every day for 10 days, totaling $1,000 in bonus bets. Take advantage of the Fanatics Sportsbook promo to bet on Friday’s college football and NBA games, ensuring a fun and rewarding way to enhance your betting experience. New users in New York can claim an exclusive offer — bet $5 and get $50 in bonus bets. Use the module below to grab this limited-time Fanatics Sportsbook promo . How to bet on college football with the Fanatics Sportsbook promo The Fanatics Sportsbook promo is perfect for Friday’s matchups across both college football and the NBA. Sign up now and receive bonus bets if your No Sweat Bet doesn’t win. With thrilling games on tap, including college football matchups and NBA action, the Fanatics Sportsbook promo gives you the opportunity to place a No Sweat Bet on your favorite games. Bet on UTSA -16.5 (-110) and enjoy the peace of mind knowing that you’ll get refunded in bonus bets up to $100 if your bet doesn’t win. Temple secured an overtime win last Saturday against Florida Atlantic, but the following day, the school made the decision to fire its head coach. This unexpected move could have a significant impact on the team’s morale, as players may begin to question their future with the program, potentially leading to distractions ahead of Friday’s game. On the other hand, UTSA’s offense is likely to prove too much for Temple’s defense to handle. UTSA has been averaging 31.2 points per game this season, while Temple’s defense is allowing a troubling 35.0 points per game. Despite UTSA’s defense also giving up 32 points per game, Temple’s offense has been underperforming, averaging only 19.1 points per game. UTSA boasts a potent passing attack, averaging 300.0 yards per game through the air, which could prove to be a major challenge for Temple’s defense as it tires to contain a high-powered offense. How to Claim the Fanatics Sportsbook Promo Activate the Fanatics Sportsbook promo and place your first bet on Friday’s exciting slate of college football and NBA matchups by following these easy steps: With the Fanatics Sportsbook promo , you can claim up to $1,000 in No Sweat Bets. Opt in each day and place a No Sweat Bet up to $100 to maximize your bonus offer and enhance your betting experience. Must be 21+. GAMBLING PROBLEM? Call 1-800-GAMBLER (CO, DC, IL, KS, KY, LA, MD, OH, MI, NC, NJ, PA, TN, VA, VT, WV, WY), (800)-327-5050 or http://gamblinghelplinema.org (MA), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), (888) 789-7777 or http://ccpg.org (CT), or 1-800-BETS-OFF (IA), or 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), or http://www.mdgamblinghelp.org (MD), or morethanagame.nc.gov (NC), or 1800gambler.net (WV). New customers who establish a Fanatics Sportsbook account are eligible for ten No Sweat Bets. Must be a cash wager of $1+ with minimum odds of -500 or longer. No Sweat Bets will equal the amount of the losing Qualifying Wager(s), up to a maximum of $100 in No Sweat Bets each day for 10 straight days. Get one No Sweat Bet every day for 10 straight days starting the day you sign up. Promotion not available in NY. Terms apply, see Fanatics Sportsbook app. Must be 21+. GAMBLING PROBLEM? Call (877-8-HOPENY) or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), New customers who establish an active and verified Fanatics Sportsbook account and place and settle a wager of $5+ cash on any market with odds of -500 or longer are eligible to receive $50 in Bonus Bets. Your Rewards in the form of Bonus Bets will be credited to your Account within 72 hours. Available only in NY. Why Trust New York Post Betting Doug Ziefel has been betting for more than a decade, and with U.S. operators in his native New Jersey since the market launched in 2018. He helps new bettors get the most out of their sportsbook promos and welcome offers for the New York Post.
B.C. premier says feds and premiers have right-left strategy to tackle Trump tariffs
The Los Angeles Lakers are shopping for a center these days, and luckily for them, a new and exciting big man asset may have become available. It's been widely assumed for weeks that LA will end up with someone like Jonas Valančiūnas of the Washington Wizards or Robert Williams III of the Portland Trail Blazers. Two further, dreamier targets for the Lakers at center are Walker Kessler of the Utah Jazz and Jakob Poeltl of the Toronto Raptors, but both will be difficult to come by. Now, according to Bleacher Report's Jake Fischer, a new name has surfaced on the market for centers, and it's not a small name at that. In fact, he's a former No. 1 overall pick. Fischer revealed on Friday that while many have assumed the Trail Blazers are shopping Williams III, they actually might prefer to sell Deandre Ayton, who is currently in year three of a four-year, $133 million contract. Apparently, Portland likes the value they are getting out of Williams III for what they are paying him, which presumably isn't how they feel about Ayton. The emergence of Donovan Clingan as a viable NBA rim protector in Portland also probably has something to do with the Trail Blazers losing interest in retaining Ayton. Whatever the reason may be, Ayton could become available on the trade market soon, which means teams that need a center (i.e. the Lakers) will be tempted to trade for the 26-year-old seven-footer. Ayton would undoubtedly be a nice pickup for the Lake Show. While he's never turned into the franchise center that the Phoenix Suns hoped he would be when they made him the first overall pick, Ayton has been far from a bust. He's averaged 16.6 points and 10.5 rebounds per game in his career thus far on 59.0 percent from the field. He's not a bad free throw shooter, either, especially for someone of his stature. He's a 76.0 percent shooter from the stripe over his career. Should the Lakers prepare an offer for Ayton? He and Anthony Davis could be a monstrous frontcourt in Los Angeles. More NBA: Lakers predicted to add two vet wings via $150 million trade package from NetsIsrael’s attorney general has ordered police to open an investigation into Benjamin Netanyahu’s wife on suspicion of harassing political opponents and witnesses in the Prime Minister’s corruption trial. The Israeli Justice Ministry made the announcement in a message late on Thursday, saying the investigation would focus on the findings of a recent report by the Uvda investigative programme into Sara Netanyahu. The programme uncovered a trove of WhatsApp messages in which Mrs Netanyahu appears to instruct a former aide to organise protests against political opponents and to intimidate Hadas Klein, a key witness in the trial. Earlier on Thursday, Mr Netanyahu blasted the Uvda report as “lies”. It is the latest in a long line of legal troubles for the Netanyahus, highlighted by the PM’s ongoing corruption trial. Mr Netanyahu is charged with fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes in a series of cases alleging he exchanged favours with powerful media moguls and wealthy associates. He denies the charges and says he is the victim of a “witch hunt” by overzealous prosecutors, police and the media.
Research Minister Dasanglu Pul, conducted a detailed assessment of the Jawaharlal Nehru State Museum in Itanagar, emphasising the need for infrastructure improvements to preserve the state’s cultural heritage. Accompanied by Research Director Sangeet Dubey, Pul highlighted the importance of understanding on-ground realities to ensure the museum meets its potential under her ministry. Pul, who also holds portfolios in women and child development, science and technology, art and culture, stressed the museum’s role in educating visitors about Arunachal Pradesh’s history, traditions, and cultural wealth. She reaffirmed her commitment to enhancing the museum as a hub for showcasing the state’s contributions to cultural and developmental progress.Italian Cops Discover Dark Reason for Nun’s Volunteer Jail Visits
(CNN) — Elon Musk’s record-breaking pay package for serving as Tesla’s CEO was rejected on Monday by a Delaware court, despite being approved by Tesla shareholders at a June meeting. The pay package, now worth $56 billion, is made up of 303 million Tesla stock options. It had been previously thrown out by the same judge , Delaware Chancery Court Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick, in January. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.Food security: Ondo govt trains extension agents on animal husbandry practices
